Posted on 01/27/2021 12:59:15 PM PST by Red Badger
There are two major reasons President Trump should file a writ of quo warranto. One big reason it to attempt to remove Joe Biden and Kamala Harris from office. Perhaps that's why Google, Facebook, Twitter, Spotify, and others are attempting to suppress information about it.
President Trump has a play he and his team can make to challenge the results of the 2020 election. It’s a longshot, but it doesn’t fall into the realm of shadow-government-military-coup or some of the other theories we’ve heard lately. This one is legitimate, legal, and does not require suspension of disbelief. It’s called a “writ of quo warranto,” something we’ve covered a couple of times on NOQ Report recently.
Unfortunately, unless you’re a regular reader of Leo Donofrio, 100percentfedup, or a handful of other websites, you’ve probably never heard of it. We’ve found a strong suppression of the facts and opinions surrounding this, a suppression that has hit close to home here. Google, after showing our original article on the first page for searches for the term, has removed the article altogether. Links of Facebook and Twitter were quickly censored. Now, Spotify and a pair of podcast hosts have dropped us inexplicably, coincidentally following the publication of our first podcast on the issue.
Are they worried? Probably not. Like I said, it’s a longshot. With a writ of quo warranto, Trump or other aggrieved parties can file with the Department of Justice in order to present evidence that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris do not have the authority to be in office. The predicate for this would be voter fraud corrupting the election, starting the dominos falling for what eventually led to the January 20 inauguration. Precedent shows that if accepted, it can be heard in the DC Circuit Court and potentially work its way up to the Supreme Court.
As Donofrio noted in a recent article, there’s another reason the Trump team should file before the coming impeachment trial in the Senate. If his writ is pending with the DoJ or in court, theoretically he cannot participate in an impeachment trial until the writ is resolved.
On the latest episode of NOQ Report, I dove deeper into the censorship surrounding a writ of quo warranto as well as the possibilities surrounding the action itself. Nobody outside of President Trump’s circle is aware of the plan going forward, but this would be a smart move from multiple angles.
What do they have to hide? Considering a writ of quo warranto is a longshot for President Trump, one would think it wouldn’t even be on Big Tech’s radar. It is, and that alone should get patriots digging deeper.
Thanks Dr. Franklin.
Has Rudy weighed in on this?
Courts will not remove Biden even if a court declares his victory illegal.
His removal will need to be political.
Impeachment is the only real path even if legally he is declared illegitimate
Quo Warranto would nullify all of Biden’s powers, he wouldn’t be able to get any order carried out and it would extend to Harris.
Pelosi would be next in line temporarily. I believe she would be CINC until the 12th Amendment process was executed.
You need to realize that anyone posting a possible strategy or solution to a problem will be met with hoots and hollers from FR’s fat-ass hand-wringers and FR’s numerous 50 IQ, brainwashed Soros trolls.
FR has lost its claim as a conservative site offering reasoned discussion and become a shrieking, mad Soros blog.
Do I think these elections were fair and square?
LOL
Sure, the same way Maduro won...
You can look for it yourself. Take some initiative.
If you don't have any initiative...allow me...
At this point I would think Speaker of the House and Pres Pro Tempore would have greater claim to the office than Trump.
There a some on FR who, like the democRATS, demand you think like they do or you're delusional, crazy, stupid, ignorant, etc. etc. etc.
Estuve alla. Ya lo hice.
It should be tried.
It goes on record.
A quo warranto may be issued from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in the name of the United States against a person who within the District of Columbia usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully holds or exercises, a franchise conferred by the United States or a public office of the United States, civil or military. The proceedings shall be deemed a civil action.
It should be tried. It goes on record.
Having filed so many law suits, what’s one or two more? The problem is that the evidence is still being hidden.
—
It shows good faith.
They are being given a chance to act lawfully.
That’s not how this is going to play out. Have a little faith.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.