Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Big Tech is suppressing information about writ of quo warranto, the ‘Trump play’
https://noqreport.com ^ | by JD Rucker | January 27, 2021

Posted on 01/27/2021 12:59:15 PM PST by Red Badger

There are two major reasons President Trump should file a writ of quo warranto. One big reason it to attempt to remove Joe Biden and Kamala Harris from office. Perhaps that's why Google, Facebook, Twitter, Spotify, and others are attempting to suppress information about it.

President Trump has a play he and his team can make to challenge the results of the 2020 election. It’s a longshot, but it doesn’t fall into the realm of shadow-government-military-coup or some of the other theories we’ve heard lately. This one is legitimate, legal, and does not require suspension of disbelief. It’s called a “writ of quo warranto,” something we’ve covered a couple of times on NOQ Report recently.

Unfortunately, unless you’re a regular reader of Leo Donofrio, 100percentfedup, or a handful of other websites, you’ve probably never heard of it. We’ve found a strong suppression of the facts and opinions surrounding this, a suppression that has hit close to home here. Google, after showing our original article on the first page for searches for the term, has removed the article altogether. Links of Facebook and Twitter were quickly censored. Now, Spotify and a pair of podcast hosts have dropped us inexplicably, coincidentally following the publication of our first podcast on the issue.

Are they worried? Probably not. Like I said, it’s a longshot. With a writ of quo warranto, Trump or other aggrieved parties can file with the Department of Justice in order to present evidence that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris do not have the authority to be in office. The predicate for this would be voter fraud corrupting the election, starting the dominos falling for what eventually led to the January 20 inauguration. Precedent shows that if accepted, it can be heard in the DC Circuit Court and potentially work its way up to the Supreme Court.

As Donofrio noted in a recent article, there’s another reason the Trump team should file before the coming impeachment trial in the Senate. If his writ is pending with the DoJ or in court, theoretically he cannot participate in an impeachment trial until the writ is resolved.

On the latest episode of NOQ Report, I dove deeper into the censorship surrounding a writ of quo warranto as well as the possibilities surrounding the action itself. Nobody outside of President Trump’s circle is aware of the plan going forward, but this would be a smart move from multiple angles.

What do they have to hide? Considering a writ of quo warranto is a longshot for President Trump, one would think it wouldn’t even be on Big Tech’s radar. It is, and that alone should get patriots digging deeper.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 01/27/2021 12:59:15 PM PST by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Pretty sure quo warranto is dead letter, but even if not he’d have to find a court willing to entertain his petitjon for the writ.

In any event, the fraud having been already accomplished in the succesful guize of legitimate process, there would limy be no grounds availible cor issuance of the writ.


2 posted on 01/27/2021 1:07:24 PM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Like I’ve said, the rule of law and fair impartial hearings on grievances is over for the next at least 2 years and probably 4. The whole government is corrupt!!!


3 posted on 01/27/2021 1:09:00 PM PST by Dawgreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

This is stupid...


4 posted on 01/27/2021 1:15:09 PM PST by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me https://youtu.be/wH-pk2vZG2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Anything yet to go before SCOTUS?


5 posted on 01/27/2021 1:18:33 PM PST by nikos1121 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

no standing. who needs law school. put me on the bench.


6 posted on 01/27/2021 1:20:18 PM PST by joshua c (Jan 20th is Dump Day. Dump them all. Twitter, Facebook, Google, Amazon, cable tv etc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

^


7 posted on 01/27/2021 1:20:22 PM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

“Pretty sure quo warranto is dead letter, but even if not he’d have to find a court willing to entertain his petitjon for the writ.”

There is only ONE court he can file it in!

PLEASE, EVERYONE, read up on this BEFORE you pontificate.

“You don’t know what you don’t know”

https://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/


8 posted on 01/27/2021 1:21:09 PM PST by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

According to Codevilla, quo warranto is only available after the questionable party, Biden, has assumed office.


9 posted on 01/27/2021 1:21:45 PM PST by DCmarcher-976453
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: joshua c
no standing. who needs law school. put me on the bench.

Trump, Pence, anyone who get fired by Biden, all have standing to file a petition for a writ of quo warranto, and maybe those affected by any new E.O.'s too. Don't quit your day job.
10 posted on 01/27/2021 1:24:19 PM PST by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

This article fails to explain what quo warranto is.


11 posted on 01/27/2021 1:27:45 PM PST by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin; All

If the AZ legislature gets the physical paper ballots from Maricopa County and let’s Jovan Hutton Pulitzer’s team do the forensics, then AZ will declare its election was stolen and people will have to go to jail.

Will it undo Biden directly? No.

But it would be a STATE declaring and it would cause other states to do the same.

This would destroy the Marxist rhetoric of a clean election.

Once three or more of the battleground states declare a stolen election, the federal statute underlying Quo Warranto can be used by any political candidate or office holder that was injured politically by the election fraud including reprisals and retaliation for investigating or espousing election fraud.

It will be damn near impossible for the US Supreme Court to deny Quo Warranto when they are presented declarations by state legislatures that their elections were stolen.

All eyes are on AZ.


12 posted on 01/27/2021 1:30:46 PM PST by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Big Tech is blocking things in their search engines for sure. Nation's In Action has an affidavit here from an American in Switzerland detailing how information about the Scytl software used in Dominion VS machines is available in Europe is blocked in the U.S.:
https://www.italy-did-it.com/post/new-affidavit-neal-david-sutz-1-21-21-people-continue-to-come-forward-with-information
Specifically, Switzerland stopped using it because it can be hacked and votes switched from one candidate to another. Yet, Google is keeping the U.S. in the dark about that history. Funny that...
13 posted on 01/27/2021 1:32:53 PM PST by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan
Quo Warranto

A writ of quo warranto is not a petition, but a notice of demand, issued by a demandant, to a respondant claiming some delegated power, and filed with a court of competent jurisdiction, to hold a hearing within 3 to 20 days, depending on the distance of the respondant to the court, to present proof of his authority to execute his claimed powers. If the court finds the proof insufficient, or if the court fails to hold the hearing, the respondant must cease to exercise the power. If the power is to hold an office, he must vacate the office.

The writ is unlike a petition or motion to show cause, because the burden of proof is on the respondant, not on the demandant.

By itself, the writ does not seek the support of the court to order the respondant to cease the exercise or vacate the office. That would be an accompanying writ of prohibito or a writ of mandamus. All such writs contemplate enforcement by the people as militia, although that could include the sheriff or constable as commander of militia. The right involved is that of the respondant to present his evidence.


https://constitution.org/1-Activism/writ/quo_warranto.htm
14 posted on 01/27/2021 1:40:23 PM PST by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
If the AZ legislature gets the physical paper ballots from Maricopa County and let’s Jovan Hutton Pulitzer’s team do the forensics, then AZ will declare its election was stolen and people will have to go to jail.

The latest is that it isn't Pulitzer that is doing the audits.

It will be two audit companies hired by the Maricopa County board to do the audits. Yes, that's the same board that refused subpoenas from the state legislators. And that's the same board that doesn't allow Pulitzer, the state legislators, the people of the state and the people of the country to participate the audit.

15 posted on 01/27/2021 1:49:31 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

If you acquiesce you let a fraudulent election and illegitimate President rule without even the thorn in his side.

You need to keep beating the drum, just like all causes do, because if you stay silent, their message wins.

Do you really think these elections were fair and square?


16 posted on 01/27/2021 1:57:20 PM PST by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
The latest is that it isn't Pulitzer that is doing the audits. It will be two audit companies hired by the Maricopa County board to do the audits. Yes, that's the same board that refused subpoenas from the state legislators. And that's the same board that doesn't allow Pulitzer, the state legislators, the people of the state and the people of the country to participate the audit.

There is a bit more on the story here: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/01/maricopa-county-officials-sell-america-refuse-audit-2020-ballots-gop-senators-vow-fight/

I don't know why the legislature is going through the hassle of litigating in the courts. They should just send the sergeant-at-arms to seize what they want to examine. If Maricopa County obstructs or hinders the seizure then its insurrection. They've let the county jerk them around and kill the clock. The whole point of the county's two audits is that they are guaranteed to find no fraud. Then when an honest audit is performed, they will call it flawed.
17 posted on 01/27/2021 2:03:01 PM PST by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

writ


18 posted on 01/27/2021 2:03:37 PM PST by TNoldman (AN AMERICAN FOR A MUSLIM/BHO FREE AMERICA. (Owner of Stars and Bars Flags))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

That’s the crooks and jokers on the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors pulling a fast one on the legislature but there’s a swell up of grass roots that won’t let them get away with it. That’s why I wrote all eyes on AZ.

Jovan’s team are aware of what’s going on.

The legislature is PO’d because this slimy Board in Maricopa agreed last week in court to give the legislature all the materials and acknowledged the legislature had superior power and standing. Now they’re playing games.


19 posted on 01/27/2021 2:25:04 PM PST by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
...but there’s a swell up of grass roots that won’t let them get away with it. That’s why I wrote all eyes on AZ.

Let's hope so.

AZ is our best shot to break the ice of all the Steal States.

20 posted on 01/27/2021 2:36:59 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson