Posted on 01/24/2021 10:03:58 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
George Stephanopoulos, the former press secretary for Bill Clinton turned ABC host, came out of the chute fast when he sat down with Kentucky Republican Sen. Rand Paul on Sunday’s “This Week” political talk show.
“Senator Paul, let me begin with a threshold question for you. This election was not stolen, do you accept that fact?”
Paul most definitely did not accept that fact.
“Well, what I would say is that the debate over whether or not there was fraud should occur, we never had any presentation in court where we actually looked at the evidence. Most of the cases were thrown out for lack of standing, which is a procedural way of not actually hearing the question. There were several states in which the law was changed by the Secretary of State and not the state legislature.”
“To me, those are clearly unconstitutional, and I think there’s still a chance that those actually do finally work their way up to the Supreme Court. Courts traditionally and historically don’t like to hear election questions. But yes. Were there people who voted twice? Were there dead people who voted? Were there illegal aliens who voted? Yes, and we should get to the bottom of it,” Paul said.
“I’ll give you an example. In my state, when we had a Democrat Secretary of State, she refused, even under federal order, to purge the rolls of illegal voters. We got a Republican Secretary of State and he purged the rules.”
But Stephanopoulos cut in, saying: “I have to stop you there. No election is perfect. But there were 86 challenges filed by President Trump and his allies in court, all were dismissed. Every state certified the results.”
(Excerpt) Read more at dailywire.com ...
He may not, but the lack of enthusiastic support is something he can’t hide from.
He’ll hire all kinds of PR firms...but they’re going to have to explain to him, you stabbed Trump in the back...
We can’t fix that $hit Rand!!!!
"Say - weren't you Rapin Bill Clinton paid liar once upon a time?"
Now that’s the truth! Good one.
In the article, he says why: "I voted to certify the state electors because I think it would be wrong for Congress to overturn that."
Yeah, because it's Congress's responsibility to certify a fraudulent election, and the electoral votes that were won because of it.
“I have to stop you there.”
NO George! We are not stopping right here.
First. We are going to go through this document by Peter Navarro. Here is YOUR copy.
Try this: Too late Presidrnt Trump. You had your chance to contest the election result and failed.
You failed to stand up when it really counts. We will remember as the next elections are stolen again and again.
He knew it was coming but wouldn't mobilize to fight them before and at the polls. Now the Communist Uni-Party will be counting dividing up the blue tsunami of as many mail-in ballots as it takes, forever. .
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.