Posted on 01/23/2021 7:34:13 AM PST by rktman
President Trump's fulfillment of campaign promises resulted in increased support among minorities, including from Hispanics in Florida, Arizona, California, Nevada, Colorado, North Carolina, Wisconsin and Texas.
In Starr County, Texas, which is 96% Hispanic, for example, Joe Biden won by only 5 points, a swing of more than 25 points from the 2016 election, noted Republican activist Rachel Campos-Duffy in an article for The Federalist.
Nearby Zapata County, Texas, which is 85% Hispanic and historically Democrat, has turned Republican, increasing its support for Trump by 15% since 2016.
So how can legacy media continue to insist that Trump is racist?
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
I agree with your argument to a point
The ones that are here, would they go back? Or would they still stay as vagrants? Would churches and groups still support them?
To me, the left was using this as a wedge issue, and it kinda worked for them in 2018
If our side was smart, yes I know, we would have done immigration reform in 2017 that allowed a path to citizen ship to ones who are worthy of it. This would have at least allowed us to keep the working, non criminal ones. Also path to citizen ship includes language classes and learning about American history and culture. <—— This is very important. Dems want them to skip these steps so they can keep them on the plantation.
Example:
Population of Detroit before :1.85 million
Population of Detroit today :680,000
You can't make that massive loss up.
It's call projection. The media always views things in terms of race. I'd say most Trump supporters do not think of themselves as from a particular race, at least not as one of their most dominant characteristics. (I only think about being white when being attacked for being white. I'm sure everyone is that way when threatened.) Trump supporters care about many issues that have to do nothing with race. It's about improving their lives, and not with handouts from government. Trump supporters are accepting of people from all races because they want to be accepted by people of all races.
It is reasonable to expect that they would return to their homelands (Mexico, Guatemala, etc.) - if only we applied enough pressure to them (by more-effectively enforcing existent legislation, but also by, e.g., criminalizing the employment of illegal aliens).
To me, the left was using this as a wedge issue, and it kinda worked for them in 2018
Don't care if it's "smart" or "not smart." Let's do what's right!
Regards,
The “whiteness” they speak of is Western Civilization. Two hundred years ago when most of the world still lived in grass huts white people were vastly more advanced and creating the modern world we enjoy living in. Their hatred is based on envy for the fact that their cultures created so very little.
“...white people were vastly more advanced...”. According to some, it was built on the backs of slaves so...... :-)
From their viewpoint, it's actually better if they are dead.
They get to pontificate at the funeral, and use their deaths as a campaign issue.
It frees up some more welfare money to buy votes from the living, and to embezzle through kickbacks and "campaign contributions" from the companies providing services to da po' folk.
And they will ALWAYS vote democrat in the future!
What's not to like if you're a democrat Mayor or Senator?
Their loved ones? Who cares? (Cue the clip of Clinton yucking it up at the Wellstone funeral, then wiping his eyes the instant he sees the camera...)
You can't make that massive loss up.
It matters not to the mayor or city council members whether the got 85% of 1.85 million or 85% of 680 thousand. They're still in charge.
A million big city democrat voters move to the suburbs?
That matters not the the democrat governor and legislators, that merely means more districts flip democrat, insuring more votes for democrats and more democrats elected state -wide.
Born and raised democrats getting taxed out of California and New York?
More democrats elected in other states overwhelmed by the locusts...
.
Fair point. To watch the local news, you’d think that no inner city youts are murdered by other inner city youts.
But the politicians don’t get any attention for ignoring the one who are, only credit for when they do speak out for the few deaths that do fit The Agenda.
Sorta the way the hunter biden laptop was covered before the election, that didn’t hurt dementia Joe in the slightest...
Yes, but with far smallet budgets and far less money to steal since they are left with poor blacks, drug addicts and ganngsters.
A million big city democrat voters move to the suburbs?
That matters not the the democrat governor and legislators, that merely means more districts flip democrat, insuring more votes for democrats and more democrats elected state -wide.
People fleeing inner city violent crimes, drug wars, high murder rates etc, don't want exactly the same chaos and anarchy where they flee to.
In a just world, yes.
In America, federal tax funds flood in for urban renewal, etc.
People fleeing inner city violent crimes, drug wars, high murder rates etc, don't want exactly the same chaos and anarchy where they flee to.
Doesn't stop them from voting for democrats and directly voting for higher taxes (sales taxes, gasoline taxes, property taxes, school bonds, road bonds).
Don't believe me?
Ask anyone in an area overrun with recent California immigrants!
That is what we assume, I have a feeling most would stay and still try to work in the black market one way or another. Handy men, house keepers, gardeners, construction, even prostitution where one can work themselves and not be “hired”.
This would still exist like it does today
I think we lost our chance of at least forming a reasonable approach to this. A right of center approach would have at least gotten something we could live with, like criminals be deported, only people with jobs/businesses are allowed to be naturalized, they must complete the naturalization process in 10 years, if not they go home, got the “dreamers” in the program as well. I mean, it wouldn’t 100% what we would want but it would be better the unfettered citizenship to anyone who promises to vote for ‘rat.
At least we could have pick and choose who could continue. What Biden wants is citizenship for them all and driver licenses and voter registration for them all as well. Plus welfare and government services.
Sometimes compromise is a good thing, sure it would not be 100% what we want, but it wouldn’t be 100% of what they want either.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.