Posted on 01/22/2021 8:33:45 AM PST by Red Badger
Their retraction-admission validates what President Trump stated in the very beginning of the pandemic
A leading medical journal has issued a retraction of their endorsement for a study that concluded the anti-viral drug hydroxychloroquine was ineffective against the COVID-19 virus. This retraction appears to validate the claims then-President Trump made about the medication being a frontline drug in the battle in the pandemic.
The Lancet, a respected online medical journal, issued an apology to its readers in an edition last year after the retraction. “We deeply apologize to you, the editors, and the journal readership for any embarrassment or inconvenience that this may have caused,” the publishers of The Lancet said.
Compared to the significantly more expensive medications being used to treat the virus, hydroxychloroquine – a drug widely used to treat malaria – is relatively inexpensive and universally available. Hydroxychloroquine ranges in price from $0.30 to $6.63 per dose depending on location.
Covfefe Coffee The Lancet’s endorsement of the study was withdrawn because the Surgisphere Corporation, the company that provided data, refused to provide full access to the information it based its study on. Peer review medical journals typically engage in third-party peer review to validate the findings.
Covid-19: Lancet retracts paper that halted hydroxychloroquine trials https://t.co/9dWQhm5QLM – What impact did this highly embarrassing “Retraction” by @TheLancet have on the adoption of Hydroxychloroquine as a ‘potential’ effective treatment for #COVID19?
— DG1 (@VerdiGg) January 18, 2021
The Surgisphere Corporation said it refused to release the study data because it would violate client agreements and confidentiality requirements, raising questions about the study’s legitimacy.
“Based on this development, we can no longer vouch for the veracity of the primary data sources. Due to this unfortunate development, the authors request that the paper be retracted,” The Lancet said in a statement.
In the now debunked study, researchers concluded that hydroxychloroquine didn’t aid in curbing the COVID-19 virus. It went on to say that the drug caused heart problems and appeared to elevate the risk of death.
The study was immediately embraced by the beleaguered World Health Organization and other groups causing research into the use of the drug to combat COVID-19 to stop.
The Corruption of Science. The Hydroxychloroquine Lancet Study Scandal. Who Was Behind It? Anthony Fauci’s Intent To Block HCQ on Behalf of Big Pharma/ By Prof Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research, June 10, 2020https://t.co/5FYzrePfgM
— Burnt Cauldron (@BurntCauldron) January 14, 2021
In seeking a third-party peer review, disturbing questions about the research and the data sets used started to emerge.
“Our independent peer reviewers informed us that Surgisphere would not transfer the full dataset, client contracts, and the full ISO audit report to their servers for analysis as such transfer would violate client agreements and confidentiality requirements,” The Lancet statement said.
The third-party peer reviewers were unable to execute “an independent and private peer review” and, thus, withdrew from the process, the medical journal stated.
There is no estimate of how many lives could have been saved if the World Health Organization and the Center for Disease Control – along with all of the many foundations and institutions who were more focused on the profit margin of vaccines and new drug therapies – would have explored the benefits of hydroxychloroquine in combating COVID-19.
“Under the spreading chestnut tree I sold you and you sold me:
There lie they, and here lie we
Under the spreading chestnut tree.”
― George Orwell, 1984
ping
uh huh, who didn’t see that coming!
Bring out your Quercetin/ Zinc
The Lancet used to be a respected medical journal until it bought the Climate Warming/Change/Disturbance/ ( Insert this months nutty euphemism) nonsense, hook line and sinker.
Looks like we can all know the future now: it will just be the reverse of what was done in the past 4 years.
Deja vu all over again...........................Yogi Berra.......................
Surgisphere action is criminal
Michigan’s Governorette Gestapo Gretchen is magnanimously allowing in-restaurant dining again on Feb. 1st.
So far...
Free beer tomorrow...
No coincidences.
To get EUA for the vaccine, there cannot be an approved therapy. Hydroxy had to be demonized so Big Pharma could have its vaccine jackpot.
Surgisphere, WHO and Fauci are complicit.
Does Big Pharma fund Surgisphere?
Dr. Zelenkos use of HCQ, Zinc and Zpac have been tested in a double blind study and the results show a high success rate in the use of the Zelenko protocol.
You can see it here:
Treatment and Prophylaxis Protocols:
https://www.vladimirzelenkomd.com/
Your damned right they withdrew their HCQ bull.
What they did was a travesty.
Ivermectin is also very effective administered early in the development of the disease:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3913936/posts?page=34
AMA also approved Hydroxy around the time of vaccine approval and the election then withdrew it.
My doctor said nobody is using Hydroxy. He is a corporate healthcare stooge.
< RANT >
"Is someone/some group literally coordinating every bit of propaganda and political narrative throughout all aspects of society."
Is not a question. It is a statement of fact. Those at that top have been revealing since the election that the U.S. is no longer a republic, and has not been a republic, for years, and are now slowly letting us in on who really is in control.
Look how the vote fraud has a wall of silence. Look at how how CNN welcomed ANTIFA as they left the Capitol Building and blamed Trump supporters who arrived a hour later. Look at the video by JaydenX of "Trump supporters" acting exactly like ANTIFA, attacking before the President started talking, because they were going to attack no matter what.
Look at Graham releasing that he knew all along Russia Collusion was a cover up for Hillary's server, the greatest espionage case in U.S. history. Which means he knew and went along with the FBI and DOJ framing President Trump for crimes that never happened to cover for Hillary Clinton and their own incompetence.
For the last four years, every single American was played for fools and we are no just finding out.
< /RANT >
...I just have let that out at least once a day.
https://lookup.icann.org/lookup
Created: 2019-07-16 22:37:27 UTC
Mediabiasfactcheck.com:
CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Conspiracy level: tin foil hat
Pseudo-sci level: strong
Factual reporting: Low
Media bias fact check tends to be harder on right wing than left wing, when you factor that in, it is still useful.
Sites like this, try to be "truthful" by truthfully reporting what someone else wrote, even if that other source is suspect.
Then they post their own "insider" stories giving the political right the confirmation bias they want to hear. SCOTUS rejected Texas? Some clerk at the SCOTUS overheard shouting about Bush v Gore. Never mind that the clerk would not have heard it, or talked about it.
Sites like this, and giving us false hope to tear down, is part of the left's plans, that they have planned for years and are carrying out methodically.
so trump could have saved many lives, and fauci exclaims he cost thousands their lives... i will never see these scum face justice.
Lancet being a reputable scientific publication? After they published a paper claiming that gender differences, in medical sense, are “exaggerated”?
I think you will find that HCQ is superseded by Ivermectin plus Monoclonal Antibodies (Eli Lilly or Regeneron).
I asked my doctor and I basically got a brush-off. “We’ll deal with that if you get sick” sort of response. I need a better COVID doctor.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.