Let’s see if there are any starting points here:
Jesse, a truck driver, has a semi-tractor rig delivering dogfood to pet shops across America. This particular brand is the expensive stuff yuppies buy for their Schnoodle dogs bred by crossing Schnauzers and Poodles and costing about $1,000. Only the best for Pierre.
Jesse, our truck driver, sees something sketchy. He has been driving this route for months, yet something this day is different. Jesse looks into the truck and sees the labels do not quite look the same. He reports it to his boss, then to the trucking service, and nobody does anything.
Jesse, a dog lover, goes to PETA and they do a video. Jesse signs an affidavit under penalty of perjury, gets on TV for a couple of days saying this dog food may not be the real thing. It might be fake, from China. He just wants someone, anyone to look into it.
Dog lovers across America would stop buying that dog food until the company had an open, public investigation. The board of directors would probably fire the CEO if an investigation showed she was not all over this possible claim. Sales would collapse. No major pet chain would carry the dog food until everything was investigated.
Ya think maybe there would be a full-scale investigation? Do you think people would stand up and say: “…there is no evidence! There is no reason to investigate!”
No we’re all living in Utopia Now under chairman Xoe
This is the biggest coverup in the history of the US. Not only by those who did the deed but by Republicans who want to ignore it.
“...woke up, fell out of bed, dragged a comb across my head...on the way down stairs I drank a cup, looking up, I noticed I was late...”
It doesn’t have to be Industrial-Scale, a few isolated pockets will do the trick.
The bigger problem is the fact that the Rat candidate basically starts with over half the EVs they need without even lifting a finger.
The opponent has to fight for every EV they can get.
Yes, massively so. Next question...
The vast voter fraud operation that Plugs admitted to in October wasn't necessary in Kalifornia...New York...Massachusetts....Texas....Ohio...North Carolina,so they didn't waste their time,or resources,in those states. States with Rat Governors that Trump won narrowly in '16. That's all that was required.
2018 also had fraud in KY, WI, MI, PA, AZ, MN and GA.
Besides the circumstancial evidence, the forensic evidence, the statistical impossibilities, the eyewitness testimony, the sworn affidavits and the video evidence, there is no evidence at all of massive voter fraud.
The election was mostly fair; it was only in a half dozen battleground states that there were "irregularities" and "computer glitches" and "clerical errors".
(/s)
Let’s suppose for a moment that there was no fraud. I believe that there was fraud, but let’s suppose there was none. If Trump had been allowed to present evidence then the other side would have easily blown holes in his argument and probably convinced most people that there was no fraud.
Biden would enter office with a much higher degree of support. This would have been healthier for the nation.
However, Trump was denied any opportunity to present evidence. We, the great unwashed proletariat are left to wonder why. The logical conclusion is that Trump might have prevailed and Biden would not be president. Leaving this belief unchallenged is a problem.
Next, why are Democrats terrified of Trump even though he is gone from office? The logical conclusion is that they wronged him and are afraid of what might happen if they don’t eliminate him and his seventy-plus million voters. Why is DC now under lockdown with thousands of soldiers? The logical conclusion might be that Democrats stole something and are terrified of the righteous indignation this may cause.
I was listening to Bill Whittle and he has a great take on where we are now. (I am not Bill Whittle.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37XokMXoJ1c
I just finished it. Unfortunately, the whole thing is just analogies that sort of fit. I completely agree with him, but the article is not compelling. It would have been, a few weeks ago. But it’s now just a post mortem.
Only a ignorant moron, or a lying democrap, could deny that basement Joe actually lost in a landslide.
Elections are one day and in person voting...but now we have election day months, have organizers push people to send in votes for months, then manufacture votes post election when Dem’s are losing.
Reminded me of this famous quote by Upton Sinclair:
“It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.”
If you still have FB or TWTR, share this article. Your account will be canceled for you.
Yes.
But the real story is not the cases of votes being switched, ballots being entered multiple times, or fake ballots printed and sneaked into the counting centers in the dead of night.
The real story is that key Democrat-controlled state and local governments allowed massive mail in voting, which is impossible to validate without extraordinary measures. And then, they purposely avoided taking those extra measures, to ensure that there would be no accountability.
All of the detailed cases of fraud were not orchestrated by some criminal mastermind - they were the natural result of purposely relaxing the controls and accountability.
It was like a city announcing on the news that for one week all doors must be left unlocked, all cameras must be turned off, all law enforcement would be suspended and people will not be permitted to defend their property or sue for damages.
What would happen? Every thief would come out of the woodwork and rob that city blind.
And that’s exactly what happened.
The problem is political corruption at the very top - going after the petty thieves who double entered ballots, changed ballots, or sneaked in fake ballots in the wee hours - that will accomplish nothing unless it leads to the elimination of political corruption in Democrat (and RINO) controlled cities.