Posted on 01/22/2021 3:35:39 AM PST by gattaca
In a decision likely to feed critics’ opinions that the major media outlets are hypocritical and biased against Republicans, the Washington Post said Wednesday it is ending a false-claims project launched at the beginning of former President Donald Trump’s term and now has “no plans” to launch a similar project as President Joe Biden begins his tenure.
“The database of Trump claims was started a month after Trump became president as a way to not overwhelm our fact-checking enterprise, where the core mission is to explain complex policy issues,” Post director of communications Shani George told The Daily Caller.
0:39 / 9:27 “While we do not have plans to launch a Biden database at this time, we will continue to dig into the accuracy of statements by political figures of all party affiliations,” George added.
For the duration of Trump’s four years in office, the Post claims he made 30,573 misleading or false statements, a figure that was posted online shortly after Biden was sworn in on Wednesday.
Glenn Kessler, an editor and chief fact-checker for the Post, remarked on Twitter he “never would have believed this number was possible when” the project “started four years ago.”
The final count. Never would have believed this number was possible when we started four years ago. https://t.co/rZaAOI0gjd pic.twitter.com/2eCUxwtmSo
— Glenn Kessler (@GlennKesslerWP) January 20, 2021
The Post itself, however, has had problems getting facts straight as well throughout Trump’s tenure, including Kessler himself.
In April, Kessler was forced to correct himself following a viral Twitter thread that was meant to fact-check the former president after Trump took issue with a Department of Health and Human Services inspector general report that said hospitals were experiencing a shortage of equipment needed to handle COVID-19.
In an April 7 tweet, Trump called out the HHS IG and asked whether the agency did a report “on the failed H1N1 Swine Flu debacle where 17,000 people died?”
“Guess what, the HHS IG did do a lengthy examination of the government’s response to the swine flu in 2009. Let’s tweet out a few key findings,” Kessler responded on Twitter the same day.
But that wasn’t true. The HHS IG, which is independent from the rest of Health and Human Services, did not actually commission the report that the WaPo fact-checker mentioned.
“The report was not an [IG] product,” the agency’s spokeswoman, Melissa Rumley, told the Daily Caller at the time.
Kessler would go on to delete his tweet and issue a mea culpa.
Rule #1: never try to do an instant fact check on Twitter. I tweeted from a government report, incorrectly saying it was an IG report, when in fact it was not. Dumb mistake, and I am glad it was brought to my attention. I have deleted the tweet, shown below, mea culpa. pic.twitter.com/DXqiSUOXHS
— Glenn Kessler (@GlennKesslerWP) April 16, 2020
In addition, the Post claimed throughout the first half of Trump’s term that the so-called ‘Russian collusion’ claims were accurate when subsequent investigations found that they were not. And more recently, the Post was dinged by then-acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell for publishing a claim that President Trump was repeatedly warned about the coronavirus.
“This isn’t true. And we told you this before you wrote. And you put the DNI denial of your premise in paragraph 9,” Grenell wrote April 28.
This isn’t true. And we told you this before you wrote. And you put the DNI denial of your premise in paragraph 9. https://t.co/kVYJvGxL0r
— Richard Grenell (@RichardGrenell) April 28, 2020
On Thursday, One America News’ Jack Prosobiec tweeted out screengrabs of two headlines — one from the Post’s fact-checker stating “Trump campaign promotes false claim that Biden would end fracking,” and one from editor Katie Pavlich at Townhall stating, “Biden Administration: Yes We are Following Through With a Fracking Ban.”
a player in the coup
So to get it straight...the fact-checker employees for the WaPo are no longer needed and thus likely of being let go now? Or were there no fact-checker employees to start with?
Because a plagiarist, liar, and all-around b-————r is going to be straight up with us.
*CHORTLE*
Bezos=Amazon =Washington Post=CIA
“UniParty”
WaPo has very high standards, both of them.
What would anyone expect from the Fake News?
Democracy dies in darkness.
Hey they could always send them to the Congressional parking garage.
Everything he says to us is absolutely true,
Including one and one is three, instead of two.
If you disbelieve, you’re a right wing thug, you see
Who’ll be deprogrammed as a threat to demoncrazy.
I’m surprised they didn’t shuffle them off to RFK stadium on the NE side, and put up tents within it.
Why can’t they take that Naval hospital ship parked over at Baltimore and just park it by Bolling AFB...letting them use the ship as a sleeping quarters.
I canceled my hometown newspaper after 24 years. Same kind of biased BS. The âÂÂwe hate Trumps guts and so should youâ paper became âÂÂwe love Joe Biden and so should youâ paper. Made me sick. In todayâÂÂs tough newspaper business, it appears one more paper will go out of business because they donâÂÂt represent the people. But, theyâÂÂll never understand why they went out of business. Very sad.
Washington Post and facts....Does not compute. Does not compute. Does not compute.
It can also die with a bright light shining in your face
And a G-man working on you with a three-foot rubber hose
Tied to a chair in a sub-basement somewhere
For saying things on Parler that make you a disgrace
We know the threat to demoncrazy that you pose
You’ll die in darkness, too, not that we care.
Pharaoh Bidet is descended from the Gods, and is therefore infallible.
Nobody fact-checks the Gods!
(even Neanderthals knew that....)
That and the sheer volume of ‘misinformation’ will be impossible to keep up with.
Or they deem everything true in advance
They’re not supposed to represent the people, just inform them reliably. They can editorialize, too, but when the story they’re supposed to report is just a thinly-veiled editorial, with only selective facts cited, if any, it’s not a newspaper, but a party organ, like Pravda or the Volkischer Beobachter or Der Strumer.
Fake Fact Checkers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.