[glorgau]

It’s kinda becoming a badge of honor to get banned from twitter.

[rightwingintelligentsia]

So, if I posted “Al Gore was robbed of the Presidency by the Supreme Court!” Twitter would ban me?

[lerker]

Seemed to be perfectly ok to question 2016’s results. Orwellian.

[Amendment10]

Please consider the following from related threads.

Patriots are reminded that hypocritical Democrats regularly challenged lawful electoral votes for republican presidents until Democrat Biden was fraudulently elected.

"In nearly 150 years, Electoral College votes have been objected to four separate times, three of which were in the last 20 years and all four times Electoral College votes have been objected by Democrats [emphasis added]." —Congress Objecting to Presidential Electors Is a Civil Rights Imperative (12.30.20)

[RideForever]

Read today that GA is still pressing for forensic audit of Maricopa county election results. Waiting for court cases to ‘clear’ so the GA poll workers won’t ‘interfere with possible court evidence tampering’. But the cases are still active. Source was USSA.com.

[Captainpaintball]

I would understand if they banned them for periodic completed total lapses in basic journalism and for glorified q-tard blogging, but this is political bias, apparently.

[RightGeek]

bttt

[Pearfect]

They are afraid to investigate as they could not handle them TRUTH.

There was election FRAUD.

INVESTIGATE!!

[Vaduz]

No Questioning of Election Results Allowed!

All the proof one needs to prove the election was rigged.

[sauropod]

.

[lepton]

So what if Pennsylvania had 205,000 more mail-in ballots than the number that were sent out?

---

Or more precisely, per the State of PA the 4 largest counties in the state hadn’t (haven’t) yet declared how many ballots they have received as of the end of December.