[E. Pluribus Unum]

FULL TEXT OF ARTICLE

https://outline.com/fyjKLf

[duckman]

Way too late for ‘would’ ‘should’ Al. Rubber is about to meet the road. Go back to your Rat party.

[Gene Eric]

We all know the GOP is contemplating the better ally — us or the Rats.

[doc maverick]

Pelosi and the entire swamp detritus team need to all be impeached after Trump is de-impeached:
The send the SWAMP TO GITMO for having Antifa/BLM pawns break into congressional chamber!

[Maudeen]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJfMZWNrwqU

Life, Liberty & Levin 1/17/21 FULL | FOX BREAKING TRUMP NEWS January 17,21

[Lod881019]

Impeachment blatantly is for removal from office when you’re out of office you can’t be impeached. If this where constitutional then congress can basically impeach any private citizen they want

[gloryblaze]

Aren’t we lucky that those lawyer guys go to school for so many years, so that they all know so clearly what the law means?

[MikeHu]

Why don’t they impeach Bill Clinton?

I believe he’s still alive.

[Repeal 16-17]

The Demon-crats and RINOs don’t care about the Constitution. They believe they have unlimited power.

[eeriegeno]

If the House did something that is unconstitutional those reps should be recalled! Their oath of office is a joke! Words that are meaningless

[Slyfox]

There they were getting ready to present all the evidence of election fraud. The one Senator needed to begin the debate announces himself - and then all hell breaks loose.

What does Pence do? Instead of consulting the rules in the Constitution he asks the parliamentarian how to proceed.

Yeah, Our Founders believed that if you don't like what they wrote in the Constitution, you just consult Robert's Rules of Order.

Right?

[adorno]

Dershowitz: Trump Post-Presidential Impeachment ‘Plainly Unconstitutional’

Since when did Pelosi and Schumer and most democrats care about the constitution?

They only mention the constitution as a cover for what they will do to violate the constitution.

Example: now they're talking about reigning in free speech through a congressional commission. That's clearly unconstitutional, but, again, they never cared about the constitution, and their only mission is to make the constitution "unconstitutional". IOW, eliminate the constitution, since it's the constitution that enables republicans and prevents democrats from achieving their goals, especially their attempts to turn the country into a socialist nation.

[BiglyCommentary]

But then, when it came to a vote on the merits, they lost because 27 or so senators voted that they did not have jurisdiction.,

That part also seems to be left out by those referencing the 1876 precedent.

[plain talk]

Dershowitz may be a liberal but when it comes to the law he seems to be a straight shooter. Refreshing.

[tet68]

If you can impeach anyone who is not a sitting president, there are no limits to the powers...

It should be plain from this that a continued impeachment
of Trump will mark the assumption of absolute power by
the democrat party. Of course they will continue to
tell you your reasoning is “baseless’ and without “evidence”.

As they say, don’t piss on my leg and tell me it’s raining...

[DoodleDawg]

The difference between the two cases Dershowitz mentioned was that neither Nixon or Belknap had been impeached while in office and Trump was. Congress will claim that since he was impeached while in office then the process has to continue. Whether or not the courts agree will be the question. Should be interesting.

[Nateman]

If they want to maintain the illusion of a fair trail they are going to have to let evidence of vote fraud be presented. The RATs have been very successful in making sure a jury never saw any of it. Their best bet is to let McConnell make the whole thing go away. Mitch ends up looking like a hero and the RATs can claim the Republicans obstructed their ‘justice’.