Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
To: Red Badger
My bet is the courts defecate all over Parlar.
2 posted on
01/11/2021 9:43:51 AM PST by
RBW in PA
To: Red Badger
AMEN!!!!! Go get ‘em and HAAAAAAAAAAAARD! In EVERY legal and political way and business way possible.
3 posted on
01/11/2021 9:44:06 AM PST by
GOP Poet
(Super cool you can change your tag line EVERYTIME you post!! :D. (Small things make me happy))
To: Red Badger
finally! because the courts have been so good for freedom.
4 posted on
01/11/2021 9:44:22 AM PST by
j_guru
To: Red Badger
Dismissed, with prejudice
5 posted on
01/11/2021 9:45:16 AM PST by
baclava
To: Red Badger
A TRO would seek to preserve the status quo, e.g. Parler continues with access and since Parler is paying Amazon it costs Amazon nothing. So it will likely be denied. Because.
To: Red Badger
Federal Court response: “Sorry, you have no standing, and besides you waited too long to file, so you know, latches...”
7 posted on
01/11/2021 9:45:44 AM PST by
Yo-Yo
(is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: Red Badger
Courts gods in black dresses: “You don’t have standing”
To: Red Badger
9 posted on
01/11/2021 9:46:24 AM PST by
kiryandil
(New Movie: The Assassination Of Ashli Babbitt By The Anonymous Coward)
To: Red Badger
Good. Many businesses are built on Amazon web services so they are all at risk. That said, AWS isn't the only alternative so Amazon will surely argue that they can't comprise a trust if there is competition on the open market. But their action to actually shut down a business capriciously argues against the just being an honest broker in an open market I'd think.
But I'm neither a lawyer or a tech billionaire so what do I know?
10 posted on
01/11/2021 9:46:41 AM PST by
pepsi_junkie
(Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
To: Red Badger
12 posted on
01/11/2021 9:47:00 AM PST by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: Red Badger
This might work for the current contract breach. But Amazon has demonstrated that they have no interest in entering into a subsequent contract. Thus, this could provide temporary relief.
To: Red Badger
Will Parler have standing? I’m glad they did this, though I think it has no chance of success. The time for voting and filing lawsuits has passed. The time to split things up is here.
14 posted on
01/11/2021 9:47:48 AM PST by
cdcdawg
(Maybe people are legitimately pissed off, they’re sick of all of this, and they don’t care anymore.)
To: Red Badger
This is where we find out if all those Trump appointments to the ninth circuit did any good.
15 posted on
01/11/2021 9:47:50 AM PST by
SeeSharp
To: Red Badger
No standing in 3, 2, 1 ...
16 posted on
01/11/2021 9:47:50 AM PST by
SecondAmendment
(This just proves my latest theory ... LEFTISTS RUIN EVERYTHING)
To: Red Badger
Asks federal judge You would have better luck asking Santa Claus.
17 posted on
01/11/2021 9:47:54 AM PST by
SIDENET
(ISAIAH 5:20)
To: Red Badger
Good first move. I doubt it works but it does keep the issue in public.
To: Red Badger
Parler is Black and the Amazon is Woolworths...
21 posted on
01/11/2021 9:48:36 AM PST by
Kickass Conservative
(THEY LIVE, and we're the only ones wearing the Sunglasses.)
To: Red Badger
How long till Free Republic is taken off and its members sent behind barbed wire?
To: Red Badger
Now they also need to sue Google and Twitter for interference with a contract.
24 posted on
01/11/2021 9:49:34 AM PST by
SeeSharp
To: Red Badger
The courts may intercede for breach of contract but not sure of the antitrust approach.....
Would have to see their arguments.....
25 posted on
01/11/2021 9:50:19 AM PST by
nevergore
(I have a terrible rash on my covfefe....)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson