Skip to comments.
Trump Sues Georgia Secretary Of State (Raffensperger)Over Leaked Phone Call
The Palmieri Report ^
| 1-3-3021
| Jacob Palmerieri
Posted on 01/03/2021 6:38:13 PM PST by blam
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
To: McGavin999
Yep, and putting people out of business benefits that deep state operation.
21
posted on
01/03/2021 6:55:10 PM PST
by
Carry me back
(Cut the feds by 90%)
To: odawg
The leaker is responsible, not Trump.
22
posted on
01/03/2021 6:56:00 PM PST
by
FrdmLvr
To: 2111USMC
To: babble-on
I don’t know. This call is a blatant and explicit attempt to commit election fraud. I guess because he’s still president he has to be impeached first, but Trump has committed a felony here beyond any shadow of a doubt. Truly staggering. Trump wants to end Democracy. He is the most disgusting elected official in American history.You forgot the sarcasm indicator.
To: odawg
Private phone call is not a defense in a defamation suit.
Defamation can happen when you utter words to another person on a phone call.
25
posted on
01/03/2021 6:58:05 PM PST
by
RummyChick
(1. I blame Kushner. 2. Pence and the firing squad tweet is my favorite absurdity of the election)
To: babble-on
babble on you don’t have a clue it was a perfect phone call...
To: blam
I H8 a betraying, backstabbing, turncoat, useless lying sack of 💩. Just sayin’.
27
posted on
01/03/2021 6:59:18 PM PST
by
rktman
( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
To: convoter2016
Uh, have you noticed the judges lately?
28
posted on
01/03/2021 7:00:57 PM PST
by
rktman
( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
To: blam
Using the negative term, “badgered,” is where I stop believing the article’s worthiness.
To equate the President’s call with pestering the SoS (POS)
with minutia is beyond disrespect. In fact, it was the President being loyal to his oath on office, “To defend and protect the Constitution of the United States of America!!!!”
29
posted on
01/03/2021 7:01:37 PM PST
by
BatGuano
(Ya don't think I'd go into combat with loose change in my pocket, do Ya? Nunc Bibendum)
To: RummyChick
litigation exception to defamation...
To: 2111USMC
“From what I read earlier, the two lawsuits had already been previously filed before this phone call.”
I believe you are correct.
Does anyone know which two lawsuits out of the many going on this has to do with?
My problems with the phone call and the settlement theory is that it didn’t sound like a phone call aimed at a settlement agreement.
But that may be perhaps where strategic edits come in to remove any mention of the words “settle, “agree,” or similar terms.
Maybe the Trump teams tape of the call is 20 minutes or so longer than what was released by the enemedia and contains more talk time by Trump’s attorneys.
31
posted on
01/03/2021 7:01:49 PM PST
by
CheshireTheCat
("Forgetting pain is convenient.Remembering it agonizing.But recovering truth is worth the suffering")
To: blam
Using the negative term, “badgered,” is where I stop believing the article’s worthiness.
To equate the President’s call with pestering the SoS (POS)
with minutia is beyond disrespect. In fact, it was the President being loyal to his oath on office, “To defend and protect the Constitution of the United States of America!!!!”
32
posted on
01/03/2021 7:02:05 PM PST
by
BatGuano
(Ya don't think I'd go into combat with loose change in my pocket, do Ya? Nunc Bibendum)
To: FrdmLvr
Just for the technicality: No. Trump uttered the words.
You might argue that the leaker is responsible for the amount of people that heard those words and the ensuing racking up of damages.
This is one of the reasons Ruby’s name was bleeped out by WAPO.
33
posted on
01/03/2021 7:02:20 PM PST
by
RummyChick
(1. I blame Kushner. 2. Pence and the firing squad tweet is my favorite absurdity of the election)
Comment #34 Removed by Moderator
To: babble-on
Is that you, pierre delecto, you oaf?
35
posted on
01/03/2021 7:04:06 PM PST
by
hal ogen
(First Amendment or Reeducation Camp??)
Comment #36 Removed by Moderator
Comment #37 Removed by Moderator
To: blam
I do not own a gun and have no intention to do so. This is not a threat from me. But, I think some is going to do some shooting sometime and I think it could be Kemp and Raffensberger in Georgia. Again this is not a threat just a prediction of what might happen. I am hearing other sane people talk violence and revolution. I am sure that 98% of the time it's just going to be talk. (I am not talking about it from myself). But I would not be surprised if it would happen in some small way. There is so much rancor and anger and I do not think the people who run the show understand how deep it runs. The refusal to listen to the rest of us is going to cause deep repercussions that will last for a long time. It is not going away. Hopefully it will be channeled into activism instead of violence.
38
posted on
01/03/2021 7:05:48 PM PST
by
amnestynone
(We are asked by people who do not tolerate us to tolerate the intolerable in the name of tolerance.)
Comment #39 Removed by Moderator
To: babble-on
Why don’t you head back on over to twitter you are not welcome here!!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson