Cut to the chase...are they challenging or not???
Looks like it. See the 3rd paragraph up from the bottom of the excerpt.
yeah really...I just skimmed and thought yada yada yada..cut to the chase
“Accordingly, we intend to vote on January 6 to reject the electors from disputed states as not ‘regularly given’ and ‘lawfully certified’ (the statutory requisite), unless and until that emergency 10-day audit is completed.
Who picks the commission?
Disappointed, but not surprised my Senator, Pat Toomey, didn’t sign. Wrote him an email, for all the good it will do.
“Cut to the chase...are they challenging or not???”
If you read the whole thing:
“Accordingly, we intend to vote on January 6 to reject the electors from disputed states”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
RTFA!!!
"Accordingly, we intend to vote on January 6 to REJECT the electors from disputed states as not ‘regularly given' and ‘lawfully certified' (the statutory requisite), unless and until that emergency 10-day audit is completed." (Emphasis added)
Is that the spoon-feeding you were whining for?
TXnMA
They are challenging it. Empty chambers, keep loaded magazine close by, and put firearms back on wall for potential future use. Continue to drill in thinly disguised reenactments, continue to establish furtive off-radar communications networks.
I know nothing. I see nothing.
Even I READ This article. :)
If there was one whole article you should have read this year this was it!
“Cut to the chase...are they challenging or not???”
I suggest you learn to read.
But, yes, they are challenging them and are calling for the Jan. 6 Electoral vote to be called off for ten days.