That’s not my point.
Didn’t he claim to be able to “hack” in and change votes on the fly in real-time. I am talking about “hacking” in via WiFi, Bluetooth, internet or whatever channel he used. Did he demonstrate that? Maybe he did and I am mistaken on that he didn’t.
The point is every claim made must have clear demonstrable proof attached to it that a politician would understand. (Yes I know a tall order given the intellectual levels of most politicians!)
No speculation & no theory stated during testimony unless asked. The China statement without evidence will be used to discredit his testimony. (And I thought they had “traffic evidence”!)
Everything has to be rock solid! And challenging it to force out evidence is how you do it.
You clearly have never conducted an investigation when the data and analysis is to be presented to a hostile audience.
His testimony was enough to convince the state legislature committee to allow him do a forensic analysis of the ballots on Monday. It was a convincing testimony as were all the others. I suggest you watch the hearing. OAN will have an encore airing of it tonight.
Didn’t he claim to be able to “hack” in and change votes on the fly in real-time.
No, Pulitzer only pointed out that it has been demonstrated that a county official has demonstrated that the Dominion hardware/software allows the changing of votes, apparently without an audit trail, during the adjudication process. He did not testify that HE had done so. However, he pointed out that anyone with administrator access, which many persons had, could do so. . . AND that such administrator passcodes were available on the machines themselves!
Pulitzer’s testimony focused on the DIFFERENCES in the printed ballots and how those printed ballots were going to be scanned, forcing these ballots into the adjudication process in inordinate and highly unusual numbers if they were anything except DEMOCRAT ballots in heavily Democrat precincts. This is a big distinction in the ballots allowing adjudicators to modify the votes they don’t approve of, or even create “properly voted” ballots. That was what he pointed out was shown demonstrated by the county official in a YOUTUBE VIDEO where she not only switched votes, but created votes out of whole cloth or showed how easy it was to eliminate the votes of Trump or Biden voters entirely, all with no oversight at all.
IF a hacker could access a Dominion machine remotely, had an administrator name and password, they could also access the Adjudication area of that machine and do everything the County, State, or other government election official could do with every ballot in the machine. THAT WAS THE POINT of remote access.
However, that’s neither here nor there if the operator is a DEMOCRAT OPERATIVE doing it locally.