Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Reily; Fury
Didn’t he claim to be able to “hack” in and change votes on the fly in real-time. I am talking about “hacking” in via WiFi, Bluetooth, internet or whatever channel he used. Did he demonstrate that? Maybe he did and I am mistaken on that he didn’t.

No, Pulitzer only pointed out that it has been demonstrated that a county official has demonstrated that the Dominion hardware/software allows the changing of votes, apparently without an audit trail, during the adjudication process. He did not testify that HE had done so. However, he pointed out that anyone with administrator access, which many persons had, could do so. . . AND that such administrator passcodes were available on the machines themselves!

Pulitzer’s testimony focused on the DIFFERENCES in the printed ballots and how those printed ballots were going to be scanned, forcing these ballots into the adjudication process in inordinate and highly unusual numbers if they were anything except DEMOCRAT ballots in heavily Democrat precincts. This is a big distinction in the ballots allowing adjudicators to modify the votes they don’t approve of, or even create “properly voted” ballots. That was what he pointed out was shown demonstrated by the county official in a YOUTUBE VIDEO where she not only switched votes, but created votes out of whole cloth or showed how easy it was to eliminate the votes of Trump or Biden voters entirely, all with no oversight at all.

IF a hacker could access a Dominion machine remotely, had an administrator name and password, they could also access the Adjudication area of that machine and do everything the County, State, or other government election official could do with every ballot in the machine. THAT WAS THE POINT of remote access.

However, that’s neither here nor there if the operator is a DEMOCRAT OPERATIVE doing it locally.

138 posted on 01/02/2021 1:30:47 PM PST by Swordmaker (My pistol self-identifies as an iPad, so you must accept it in gun-free zones, you hoplophobe bigot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]


To: Reily; Fury
Proof of the inordinately high percentage of Fulton County votes which had to be "adjudicated" in the November 3, 2020 election. It was worse than I recalled! Normal and historic levels of adjudication are below 5% of all ballots submitted! This is from testimony presented to the Georgia Senate hearing:

Based on a statement from Richard Barron, director of Fulton County Board of Election and Registration, ballot adjudications happened substantially in the county, which has the largest population in the Peach State.

“We scanned 113,130 as of moments ago, we’ve adjudicated 106,000 plus [93.7 percent] of those,” he can be seen saying in a video clip. “The only ballots that are adjudicated are if we have a ballot with a contest on it in which there’s some question as to what, how the computer reads it. So the vote review panel then determines voter intent.”

93.7% of Fulton County votes had had to be adjudicated because the Dominion system scanners had problems scanning them, so a human being (Democrat Election Operative) had to adjust the intent of the voter to allow that ballot to be counted, with no Republican oversight, and apparently no audit trail!

158 posted on 01/02/2021 10:01:35 PM PST by Swordmaker (My pistol self-identifies as an iPad, so you must accept it in gun-free zones, you hoplophobe bigot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson