Posted on 01/02/2021 7:23:36 AM PST by New Perspective
(ATLANTA)-Yesterday, during a Georgia State Senate hearing, failed treasure hunter, J. Hutton Pulitzer, or Commander Pulitzer (no record of military experience), claimed that he had “hacked” Georgia’s voting system.
(Excerpt) Read more at sos.ga.gov ...
Please see post 100.
Please see post 100.
I’m focusing on his claim regarding of a voting system being accessed (”hacked” is what some people called it). But lets add the claim about a piece of equipment being connected to the Internet and also connected somewhere in China.
If it was such an irrelevant interruption, why did Jovan Pulitizer bring it up?
Jovan - SHOW US THE DATA.
Who knows - he has not published a report on what exactly occurred. Just did some jackass in'.
Thank you. Why are so many people on FR attacking the Pulitzer guy? He has his own reasons for not showing how he hacked into Dominion.
Meanwhile, everyone forgets that this POS SOS Ratburger has been obstructing justice and violating my voting rights.
HE’S THE ONE PEOPLE SHOULD BE SCREAMING AT.
Then again, the FR trolls seem to be very active these days. Wonder why...
The biography did not come through - do you have a URL?
Why are you bothering with that?
The Dominion systems, contrary to the lies of their CEO before the Michigan legislature committee that took his "testimony", connect to the Internet.
Just because you either ignored or didn't see the relevant testimony showing that doesn't make it incumbent on US to inform you.
And I'm not talking about the Pulitzer stunt, either - even though I did enjoy it.
Then why is it being brought up? By him and/or his team?
He did some jackassin'. He should not be doing that unless he's going to show the proof. And you're right - he's going to get called out for it if he doesn't show his data.
Why are you bothering with that?
The Dominion systems, contrary to the lies of their CEO before the Michigan legislature committee that took his "testimony", connect to the Internet.
Just because you either ignored or didn't see the relevant testimony showing that doesn't make it incumbent on US to inform you.
And I'm not talking about the Pulitzer stunt, either - even though I did enjoy it.
I am talking about the Pulitzer incident.
So talk about what you want re: Pulitzer and I will do the same.
Deal. Great. Carry on.
Cut yer jackassin’, dipstick.
Yep. Suzie Voyles already proved weeks ago with her testimony before the Georgia legislature that the Dominion machines connect to the Internet.
Just because this "Fury" clown doesn't know that or is pretending not to know it doesn't legitimize his jackassin' about the Pulitzer testimony.
It just makes him more of a clown...
Flak over target pewrhaps?
LOL!!!
Just want intellectual honesty regarding claims that Pulitzer made. Not Susan Voyles or anyone else.
Why are you so triggered when data for what Pulitzer claims occurred is requested?
31 of the 114 posts on this thread are by YOU.
You seem to be the "triggered" one...
Asking for data for an as yet unsubstantiated claim made about voting machines.
Sorry that makes you so uncomfortable.
Did he actually hack into the server or did he say he hacked into the server? Because I haven’t seen any video where he shows he’s actually hacked into the server, it’s just him saying he did. Which won’t stand up in court.
The video of what he said:
https://insiderpaper.com/jovan-pulitzer-hacked-fulton-county-voting-machine-wifi-georgia/
No mention of “hack”.
You should talk to the folks who are using J. Pulitzer as an example of election fraud.
The point has been made. Pulitzer is either unable or unwilling to show the data of his accessing voting machines, even though he made a point of mentioning it at his testimony.
Hopefully he will soon, or his credibility is justly called into question.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.