Please see post 100.
I’m focusing on his claim regarding of a voting system being accessed (”hacked” is what some people called it). But lets add the claim about a piece of equipment being connected to the Internet and also connected somewhere in China.
If it was such an irrelevant interruption, why did Jovan Pulitizer bring it up?
Jovan - SHOW US THE DATA.
Why are you bothering with that?
The Dominion systems, contrary to the lies of their CEO before the Michigan legislature committee that took his "testimony", connect to the Internet.
Just because you either ignored or didn't see the relevant testimony showing that doesn't make it incumbent on US to inform you.
And I'm not talking about the Pulitzer stunt, either - even though I did enjoy it.
Why? Because he was testifying to the Fraud that had taken place, was before the Georgia Senate about Fraud, and the Senate had only so much time they had allotted to hearing about the Fraud, and then they were going to shut down. No one else was listed on the agenda was going to speak on this or knew about it. Who else was going to present the fact of this discovery, preliminary as it may be, breaking just that day!
You want perfectly explored and discovered data, wrapped up in iridescent party paper with a gift ribbon tied with an elaborate bow, certified with absolute air-tight proof presented to people who would not grasp the facts or the air-tightness of the proof. . . In a limited-time five minute allotted testimony period, all presented in a bulleted slide show. Ain’t gonna happen.
Pulitzer had a presentation he only had limited time to get HIS primary point across that was important to show how BALLOTS were illegally manipulated to miscount the votes in Fulton County. There was no legitimate reason for ballots to have party differentiation in a general election where there were no party issues to be decided. Yet he found that Fulton County had printed ballots for different precincts with PARTY disparities. WHY??? What advantage would redound to anyone by doing such a printing disparity? What results could affect the count? THAT WAS FAR MORE IMPORTANT THAN WHAT COULD BE PROVEN ABOUT A POSSIBLE INTERNET/CHINA CONNECTIVITY THAT NEEDS TO BE EXPOSED, BUT IS AN ASIDE TO HIS TESTIMONY! That’s mere sideshow. Your effort is to obfuscate the main point of Pulitzer’s testimony.