[Blood of Tyrants]

If one state doesn’t have “standing” to sue another state because the other state over an election that affects EVERYONE, then exactly who does have standing?

[rxsid]

"If one state doesn’t have “standing” to sue another state because the other state over an election that affects EVERYONE, then exactly who does have standing?."

Well, that's just the thing isn't it!?!?

A PRESIDENTIAL election affects EVERYONE in the country. Not just a single location or state. The President is everyone's chief executive.

If one or more states conduct fraudulent elections that CHANGES the outcome of the election....that affects EVERYONE!

Those 4 states illegal counting of votes PAST "election day" directly affects everyone in the country because it "changed" the results of who would be the winner.

SCOTUS, in a unanimous decision, said that went against the Constitution and is therefore unlawful.

[null and void]

If one state doesn’t have “standing” to sue another state because the other state over an election that affects EVERYONE, then exactly who does have standing?

No one, just like when obama was installed in the Offal Office.

Yet Wickard v. Filburn determined that growing wheat on your own land for your own use, and not for sale or trade, was an interstate commerce issue...

[Sirius Lee]

exactly who does have standing?

To have standing you have to present evidence in a court of law proving fraud. To present evidence in a court of law you have to have standing. See how that works? Kafka did.

[A Navy Vet]

"If one state doesn’t have “standing” to sue another state because the other state over an election that affects EVERYONE, then exactly who does have standing?"

Yes, I thought throwing out the TEXAS suit regarding other States arbitrarily changing their election laws was bogus. Bush vs Florida won in 2000 for that exact reason.