Posted on 12/16/2020 8:31:21 AM PST by Red Badger
what possible good is SCOTUS if they only watch porn,
defend foreign countries, and ignore interstate
legal question and the worst possible
CRIMES in the USA including STEALING an ELECTION??
Here is an excerpt from Fox News’ coverage of the story, FWIW. It seems that the Kansas situation was not just about whether or not to require ID to vote, as per the second paragraph.
“The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to review an appeal from Kansas seeking to reinstate voter identification laws which a federal appeals court had declared unconstitutional earlier this year.
Kansas had been the only state to require people to show a physical document such as a birth certificate or passport when applying to register to vote. The issue is distinct from state laws that call for people to produce driver licenses or other photo IDs to cast a vote in person.”
Words fail me
They have become the equivalent of the USSR’s Supreme Soviet..............basically a RUBBER STAMP group...................
Not looking good.
Absolutely jaw dropping.
I recently had to get a new Ohio driver’s license. In order to use my driver’s license as ID to fly domestically, I had to produce a birth certificate, my social security card, and recent bills to prove my residency.
But to vote, something as important as voting, an ID is discriminatory?!
You’re right. We are done.
Infuriating.
UHaul rental, car rental, old days of video and dvd rental, any new prescription, clinic or hospital admission, opening a bank account and more——absolute demand for photo ID.
Voting? That’s racisss.
Upholding the Constitution is unconstitutional to these idiots.
That is different than deciding a case.
Why do we have to show ID when buying SUDAFED!
Theirs maybe ... In all seriousness, I (like a ton of others) am wondering about the wisdom of even having a "Supreme Court". It's ridiculous what they're doing!
Between November and now, the USSC as *effectively* decided, that - in the USA:
- any body, dead or alive, can vote
- any person of the world, can vote
- any “ballot” is a ballot to be counted
So if 2 million Chinese People’s Liberation Army members jump off an airplane in KC, do instant registration using their hotel receipts for “proof of residency”, that’s OK by the Supremes?
Maybe they think they’re the UN court, not the Supreme Court of the United States.
So then, what is the Constitutional justification to require me to provide ID and submit to an FBI background check just to exercise my 2A right to buy a firearm?
America is over.. makes me sick..
Because a driver’s license or photo ID does not prove citizenship. . .they want voters to prove citizenship. . .that’s the issue.
This is one of those times where Kansas should do it anyway. What could the Supreme Court do? They have no police.
If only citizens can vote, it seems like a no brainer that the state should make sure of this.
It looks like SC is not going to touch states’ voting laws. I hope Kansas itself goes back to the drawing board - along with all the others who have been complicit in this skullduggery.
But if I’m 50 and they demand ID for a liquor purchase...that’s fine...
Free men are protected by only two things. Our ability to vote, and the 2nd amendment. Since you’ve stolen the first one, prepare for the 2nd.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.