Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ANALYSIS: After 100 Votes Sampled, Biden’s Arizona Lead May Diminish to 0.19% of Total Vote, Disappear Entirely; With only 10.3% adjudication, Trump already wins the election by 40 votes.
National File ^ | 12/09/2020 | Jack Hadfield

Posted on 12/09/2020 8:56:16 PM PST by SeekAndFind

Following an examination of a 100 vote sample conducted by the Arizona GOP, analysis by National File has concluded Biden’s lead in the state could drop down to 0.19% of the total votes cast.

On Wednesday, Arizona GOP Chair Dr Kelli Ward revealed the results of the examination of a 100 vote sample that they had conducted, after being granted access to the ballots by Judge Randall Warner. The votes examined in this batch were reduplicated ballots, in that they are a copy made from an original vote when it cannot be tabulated. This copying is meant to be done by a bipartisan team of county workers, which Ward alleges did not happen in many cases.

In the 100 vote batch, two votes were discovered that were of concern. Arizona GOP lawyer Jack Wilenchik wrote in a court filing that one original ballot contained “was clearly a vote for Trump,” but the “duplicate ballot switched the vote to Biden,” while a second Trump vote was completely discarded, due to the duplicate ballot also including a “blank” vote for a write-in presidential candidate.

In today's update, Chairwoman @kelliwardaz announces the findings from our investigation of 100 duplicate ballots, in which TWO votes were discovered to have been altered and removed from President @realDonaldTrump's total. pic.twitter.com/6Dg9zd2XGd

— Arizona Republican Party (@AZGOP) December 2, 2020

“Thank goodness that Judge Warner said he wanted to err on the side of transparency and let us look at these,” Ward said in a video released to Twitter. “Those media propagandists who say there is no evidence of fraud can now shut up.”

“It looks like this election has attempted to have been stolen from President Trump,” Ward added, noting that the attorneys for Democrat Secretary of State Katie Hobbs and the Biden electors wanted the results of the examination to be kept secret. “This shows us that these Democrats are anti-transparency, and potentially covering up fraud,” Ward continued. “We will not stop looking until all of this is brought to light.”

National File has undergone an exclusive and extensive mathematical analysis to discover what the total vote count, and therefore Biden’s Arizona lead, may look like if the findings of this sample size can be extrapolated to state level. It is unknown how many ballots required duplication, as the statewide canvass did not specify this. National File is therefore using the pre-election estimate of Maricopa County, which suggested they may see around a 2-4% reduplication rate.

Before entering the analysis, it is important to note that we will be using the total votes cast in the state for all candidates as our starting number, (3,397,388), rather than the total votes cast for Trump and Biden together, as we are assuming that the 100 vote sample was a fair sample, and was therefore likely to include votes for other candidates. The initial vote sample returned a rate of 2% of the votes in the sample that should have been cast for Trump that were not.

There are also two types of vote change happening here. Biden currently leads Trump by 10,457 votes. The vote not counted for President Trump would remove one vote from him, and the vote that was initially given to Biden, but returned from Trump, would reduce the total vote difference by two, as it removes one away from Biden, and giving one more to Trump. We will therefore be multiplying the total error votes in our calculation by 1.5 to correct for this. This is equivalent to a 3% change.

Using the 2% lower bound reduplication rate from Maricopa County, 1,359 ballots would have been counted in error. Assuming the split between Trump votes purely lost and Trump votes given to Biden remained the same in the sample, then Biden’s lead would drop down by 2,038 votes to 8,419.

When using the 4% upper bound reduplication rate, 2,718 ballots would have been cast in error. Assuming the same split as before, this would reduce Biden’s lead in Arizona down by 4,077 votes to 6,380. This lead is 0.19% of all total votes cast in Arizona.

READ MORE: Twitter BANS Mathematician Who Said He’d “Rather Resign” Than Certify Fraudulent Arizona Results

However, it is reasonable to assume the reduplication rate could be far higher than the pre-election estimates from Maricopa. During the election integrity hearing in Arizona on Monday, Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani and expert witness Colonel Phil Waldron referred to a witness who saw all day “election officials constantly pressing the green button [on the voting machine] when somebody was voting.”

This green button in question is the one that is pressed when an error ballot is needed to be created, and the votes would then be “put into a batch file that could be adjudicated.” To be “put into a batch file” is simply another term for being electronically reduplicated. If this button was being pressed “all day,” all across the state, then it is not unreasonable to suggest a higher reduplication rate than expected.

Using the figures from our Arizona analysis, President Trump would only need a reduplication rate of 10.3% to flip the state back to him, winning by a vote lead of 41 votes. However, to win Arizona, President Trump would only need this to be the case if no other fraud or voting irregularities are discovered.

Colonel Waldron linked the reduplication of ballots to the SharpieGate controversy, where Republican leaning voters were instructed to use Sharpies, not ballpoint pens when voting. “The idea is that [there would be] bleedthrough on the ballot, [and therefore] the scanners would cause an error ballot,” Waldron said.

READ MORE: FACT CHECK: Media, Dominion, Arizona Sec of State Issue Contradictory Messages on SharpieGate as Expert Says It’s Real

Arizona Representative Dr. Paul Gosar extrapolated the 3% vote change discovered and reasonably hypothesized this to be the rate of fraud seen throughout the state for Biden – not an unreasonable assumption when the votes discovered were so apparently blatantly changed. “If the 3% fraud rate remains on a larger sample, Trump easily wins Arizona,” Dr. Gosar tweeted.

Maricopa County on Wednesday offered a further 2,500 additional duplicated ballots for the Arizona GOP to look through. This further analysis will likely change the percentages originally discovered from what Ward admitted was a “very, very small” initial sample.

The Arizona GOP announced that it will be posting another “big” update on Thursday, according to an announcement posted on their Twitter page.



President Trump seemed to reference a large number of voting irregularities, potentially tied to SharpieGate, that could have led to a larger than usual number of adjudicated ballots.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: arizona; voterfraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 12/09/2020 8:56:16 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Lets do this


2 posted on 12/09/2020 8:57:30 PM PST by CPT Clay (Q sent me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

Ping


3 posted on 12/09/2020 8:58:55 PM PST by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Arizona hasn’t certified yet?


4 posted on 12/09/2020 8:59:58 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (You are in far more danger from an authoritarian government than you are from a seasonal virus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Who cares if they certified? You don’t get to fraudulently steal an election just because the Secretary of State is lazy and crooked.


5 posted on 12/09/2020 9:05:02 PM PST by doragsda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Any non machine readable ballot should be tossed.


6 posted on 12/09/2020 9:05:35 PM PST by brianr10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doragsda

It was just a question.

I like to know facts.


7 posted on 12/09/2020 9:06:10 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (You are in far more danger from an authoritarian government than you are from a seasonal virus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If you can take a sample that small and see that type of response, it generally means there are a lot of similar responses in the population. This would be nearly incontrovertible proof if the same can be said of another small sample (the chances of seeing the same response in two small samples are infinitesimally small unless the signal exists throughout the entire population being sampled).


8 posted on 12/09/2020 9:06:35 PM PST by jurroppi1 (The Left doesn't have ideas, it has cliches. H/T Flick Lives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jurroppi1

And this is just ONE of the MANY frauds perpetrated.


9 posted on 12/09/2020 9:36:21 PM PST by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps; All

- Any ballot cast by executive level decree (ie SoS), and with no actual *CHAIN OF CUSTODY*, should be tossed. (500,000-600,000 thousand ballots).

- All requested absentee ballot requests need to be verified, as 100,000 actual requested AZ absentee ballots were found in Clark County, Nevada (Las Vegas).

- All dead voter ballots should be tossed.

- All duplicate votes must be tossed.

- All illegal/unverifiable resident voter ballots should be tossed.

- All ballots counted by Dominion employee’s must be forensically audited.

- All ballots removed by use of issued “sharpie’s” must be adjudicated/judged.

Of course, every point above would require complete forensic audits.

We are screwed big time on the Dominion voting machines across AZ, as these have built in data/records “Bleach Bit” type wiping. Additionally, the Dominion operatives have been canvassed the country over the past month to make sure the machines are all wiped clean of all fraudulent evidence.


10 posted on 12/09/2020 9:41:04 PM PST by patriotfury ((May the fleas of a thousand camels occupy mo' ham mads tents!) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Bobby Piton (who was banned by Youtube after giving his analysis) made one interesting point - since 2000, Arizona’s population has grown at 1% per year - but its number of voters has grown by 7% a year. Such that in some districts, voter turnout is well over 90%, which is extremely unlikely.

His point is that fraud has been occurring for years.


11 posted on 12/09/2020 10:07:32 PM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This is old news, right? Weren’t they granted a 1000 ballot sample based on this?


12 posted on 12/09/2020 10:21:21 PM PST by Religion and Politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Religion and Politics

At least a week old.


13 posted on 12/09/2020 10:44:09 PM PST by Doofer ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Certified election totals can be contested, adjusted, and recertified until the day the Electoral College votes.

In 2000, recall that the Florida election could not actually be contested until after certification (even though the SCoFLA kept trying to block certification and adjust the counts). After Certification, there were time frames for each the losing campaign to contest, the winning campaign to respond, and the losing campaign to respond to that, before the Electors were actually appointed.


14 posted on 12/09/2020 11:33:55 PM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CPT Clay

not massive fraud ... only 2 percent fraud. Just enough to steal the election.

America ... where riots are mostly peaceful and elections are mostly honest.

This is only one part of the steal. Messing with duplicate ballots. Obviously, all of the duplicate ballots need to be checked. There are dishonest employees among the election workers in this state. There needs to be some check on them, more than volunteer poll watchers, and they need to be held accountable.

The entire Democrapic Party is so full of Trump Derangement Syndrome, our elections have been compromised.

Of course they will re-distribute the vote. They advocate for re-distributing wealth, don’t they? They believe in abortion and mercy killing. They don’t believe in God or the Ten Commandments, and there’s no such thing as lying or cheating in their book, because they have no book. The so-called Christians among them like Reverend Warlock of the g-d communist parry aren’t Christians. You can not trust the bastards.


15 posted on 12/09/2020 11:50:51 PM PST by Redmen4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: faucetman

Somebody was orchestrating and conducting this fraud all over the country.

My wufe thinks it’s Hillary.

Has anyone checked telephone and internet activity surges around 9-10 pm election night?


16 posted on 12/10/2020 1:47:28 AM PST by FroggyTheGremlim (I'll be good, I will, I will!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

That’s who I thought of when I heard AZ joined the Texas suit;

Piton’s Phantom Sleeper Voters
being injected into the count
https://twitter.com/BobbyPiton3/status/1336323965493465093

Quote
“I have figured out an algorithm of how #PhantomSleeperVoters
are created in the data.
Based on results in AZ and soon... other States...
this will be proved out across US!

...a 9 page synopsis of the AZ Results. I sent this to all 47 Members of the GOP in the House and Senate.”


17 posted on 12/10/2020 2:57:11 AM PST by Son House
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FroggyTheGremlim

There’s no way Hillary would help another woman take the Presidency or Vice Presidency while she still draws breath...


18 posted on 12/10/2020 3:31:38 AM PST by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: FroggyTheGremlim

“Somebody was orchestrating and conducting this fraud all over the country.

My wufe thinks it’s Hillary.”

China, Iran, Obama.


19 posted on 12/10/2020 3:47:06 AM PST by Paperpusher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Paperpusher

“Somebody was orchestrating and conducting this fraud all over the country.

Obummer has been very quite, normally he has an opinion on anything that breathes.


20 posted on 12/10/2020 4:30:12 AM PST by crazycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson