Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Professor in Texas lawsuit: Odds of Biden winning all four contested states ‘less than one in a quadrillion to the fourth power’
https://noqreport.com ^ | by JD Rucker December 9, 2020

Posted on 12/09/2020 9:04:17 AM PST by Red Badger

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: Red Badger

And may we finally see some of that software/algorithm issue the legislatures and election
officials should have already got to the bottom of before certifying the vote?

Ratio Transfers Proved; Entire Algorithm Reversed
https://rumble.com/vblspz-smoking-gun-part-2-ratio-transfers-proved-entire-algorithm-reversed-net-200.html

Part of the Summary Description at Video link;

Quote

“That the final hijacked state of all precincts can have their total votes changed to a uniform number, such as 20,000 total votes per precinct, and the percentage remains the same (14.65%), which is proof that a simple linear algebra algorithm was adjusting requisite precinct totals against a flat polarized template.

10: That the fraud is proven by the fact that all hijacked precincts in their final states can be filled with the same number of votes per precincts, and it equals the same flip of trump to total (confirming a live algorithm was balancing the zero point average from a blank template using equal weight on each precinct).”

Watch at 8:00m, 22:00m, 27:00, for about 3 to 4 minutes to get some big ideas,

Other highlight points in the video;

42:00m Summarizes how the algorithm works

66:00m Real Evidence about 6 to 8 minutes long

88:30m Reverse engineering the wheel

105:00m Well balanced wheel

106:00m More evidence as wheel folds in like a fan

134:30m The tree re-balancing may be related to the roll back of votes counts seen

139:00m Summation formula of splitting the load between precincts

140:00 The wheel number


41 posted on 12/09/2020 12:26:33 PM PST by Son House
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

He would probably say that polls are designed to prepare you for the steal, not give you the real sentiment of those being polled. I would.


42 posted on 12/09/2020 1:10:44 PM PST by itsahoot (The ability to read auto correct is necessary to read my posts understanding them is another matter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Delta 21

ping statistical impossibility numbers - quantum physics.


43 posted on 12/09/2020 7:31:27 PM PST by WhattheDickens? (Funny, I didn’t think this was 1984…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: goldbux
Correct notation: One quadrillion = 10^15.

One quadrillion to the fourth power = (10^15)^4 = 10^60.

Probability of ByeDone winning the four contested states = P( 1 / 10^60 ).

Statistically impossible.

From the article:
that puts Joe Biden’s odds at 1 in 1060. Anything beyond 1051 is considered absolutely impossible by quantum physicists. There are somewhere between 1078 to 1082 atoms in the known universe. In other words, Joe Biden did not miraculously win Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin the morning after the election. Either he cheated or someone orchestrated massive cheating on his behalf.
IMHO it might better be stated mathematically that the process which produced Trump’s lead and the process which reversed it were two different processes.

Trump’s lead developed in a credible way, and presumptively constituted a free and (at least somewhat) fair election.

Trump’s lead vanished in a far less credible way (absent poll watchers, eg) - which did not constitute the workings of a free and fair election.


44 posted on 12/09/2020 11:21:06 PM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (Socialism is cynicism directed towards society and - correspondingly - naivete towards government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Mouton; dp0622; goldbux; Larry Lucido; Lazamataz; ransomnote; All
Warning! Numbers ahead!

I didn't see Professor Cicchetti's calculation of his 1-in-quadrillion estimate for ByeDone's winning just one of four contested states, but since the probability of just 100 consecutive flips of a fair coin landing tails up is 1 / (2^100) = one in 1.26765 * 10^30, I'll assume he's correct.

A quadrillion to the fourth power = 10^60. An astronomic number. Let's apply it to physically understandable terms.

Ignoring the nuclear strong force, and measuring only relative volumes, about 10^60 densely packed protons would fill the volume of our observable universe. The article cited claims ~ 10^80 atoms in the known universe. That's a much larger number, and assumes counting actual atoms instead of packing protons into mostly empty space. Perhaps 10^60 is a conservative estimate.

——

There are 31,557,600 [3.15576 * 10^7] seconds in one year of 365.25 days [normalized for leap years, but ignoring the recurring 400-year exemption.]

A quadrillion [10^15] seconds would elapse in [10^15 / (3.15576 * 10^7) =] 31,688,087.814 years. That's 3.169 * 10^7 years.

A quadrillion quadrillion quadrillion quadrillion seconds would elapse in [10^60 / (3.15576 * 10^7) =] 3.169 * 10^52 years.

A counter starting at zero, incrementing by 1 each second, would take 3.169 * 10^52 years to reach a total of 10^60.

A cpu chip capable of computing at ten teraflops [10^13 floating point operations per second] would increment [by 1] a register – starting at zero – up to 10 trillion in one second; 20 trillion after two seconds, etc.

Conventional wisdom pegs the age of our known universe at ~ 13 billion [1.3 * 10^10] years, from the Big Bang to the present.

A teraflop-counting device would take 3.169 * 10^39 years to reach 10^60.

That time span [(3.169 * 10^39) / (1.3 * 10^10)] = 2.43755 * 10^29 universe ages to reach 10^60. That's 2.43755 * 100,000 trillion trillion universe ages!

The probability of ByeDone winning all four contested states = P(Event) = 1 / (10^60) = selecting one specific second out of 3.169 * 10^52 years = selecting one specific ten-trillionth of a second in 2.43755 * 100,000 trillion trillion universe ages. That is, ZERO.

Pinging this to a few FReepers who enjoy mathematical estimates, and will be glad to correct any errors.

45 posted on 12/09/2020 11:54:07 PM PST by goldbux (No sufficiently rich interpreted language can represent its own semantics. -- Alfred Tarski, 1936)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

Yes. Well stated.


46 posted on 12/10/2020 12:03:54 AM PST by goldbux (No sufficiently rich interpreted language can represent its own semantics. -- Alfred Tarski, 1936)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: FlipWilson; goldbux; poconopundit; PGalt
The problem is enormous-sounding but has a finite solution.

The legislatures of the defendant states could simply announce a do-over election in the contested precincts only (Georgia for one already has a special election scheduled for early next year, statewide).

How big a deal would it be to run do-overs of the presidential election in Philadelphia, Pittsburg, Detroit, and Milwaukee?

Run, of course, under strict supervision of reliable, well-trained and well-supported poll watchers and run strictly by the law without any creative destruction by officials overstepping their authority.

And with video documenting the number of voters and the behavior of the poll workers. And no Dominion machines . . .


47 posted on 12/10/2020 4:13:31 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (Socialism is cynicism directed towards society and - correspondingly - naivete towards government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

Well put argument!

And that’s the most acceptable solution of all. And it may be sufficiently broadened to include all counties of the contested States where there are fraud questions.


48 posted on 12/10/2020 4:25:59 AM PST by poconopundit (Hard oak fist in an Irish velvet glove: Kayleigh the Shillelagh we salute your work!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Tilted Irish Kilt

Chris Plante (WMAL) uses the term “President Alleged.”


49 posted on 12/10/2020 5:21:48 AM PST by PLMerite ("They say that we were Cold Warriors. Yes, and a bloody good show, too." - Robert Conquest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: PLMerite
PLMerite : " Chris Plante (WMAL) uses the term “President Alleged.”

Actually, that is the clearest and most accurate description of the election fabrication :
“President Alleged ” Bye Done Thank you for that !

50 posted on 12/10/2020 6:14:12 AM PST by Tilted Irish Kilt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: poconopundit
Thx.
But I still insist that SCOTUS desperately needs a case in which it can overturn the Sullivan decision to enable it to require the FCC to protect the Constitution from anti-constitution/anti-SCOTUS propaganda.

51 posted on 12/10/2020 6:39:59 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (Socialism is cynicism directed towards society and - correspondingly - naivete towards government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

Agree. Whenever my wife watches the NHK news station from Japan, they parrot the AP and ABC News repeatedly.

And I think most foreign nations except places like Australia perhaps, are getting fed this crap.


52 posted on 12/10/2020 7:13:17 AM PST by poconopundit (Hard oak fist in an Irish velvet glove: Kayleigh the Shillelagh we salute your work!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: goldbux
the probability of just 100 consecutive flips of a fair coin landing tails up is 1 / (2^100) = one in 1.26765 * 10^30
Standard engineering: a signal strength change of 3db is approximately a factor of two.

And “db" is defined as 10*log10(power ratio)

Thus, a factor of two being 3db corresponds to

log10|2| approximately equals 0.3. and

log10|2100| = 100*0.3 = 30

So your order of magnitude checks.😊


53 posted on 12/10/2020 8:27:33 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (Socialism is cynicism directed towards society and - correspondingly - naivete towards government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

Thank you for the confirmation.


54 posted on 12/10/2020 8:45:09 AM PST by goldbux (No sufficiently rich interpreted language can represent its own semantics. -- Alfred Tarski, 1936)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson