Professor in Texas lawsuit: Odds of Biden winning all four contested states ‘less than one in a quadrillion to the fourth power’

https://noqreport.com ^ | by JD Rucker December 9, 2020

[goldbux]

Looks like the exponent symbol was dropped or stripped off.

Correct notation: One quadrillion = 10^15.

One quadrillion to the fourth power = (10^15)^4 = 10^60.

Probability of ByeDone winning the four contested states = P( 1 / 10^60 ).

Statistically impossible.

[Mouton]

I think I read somewhere the same odds of Obama being a natural citizen.

[FoxInSocks]

It’s a typesetting error. There’s only supposed to be three zeros to the right of that last comma; the 4 is supposed to be a superscript.

The way exponents read here is a little confusing at first glance.

[wastedyears]

Your explanation makes sense.

[Swordmaker]

The author wrote one quadrillion and four, not one quadrillion to the fourth power.

Math was my worst subject for my whole life and even I know that.

The author is mistaking an indicator of a footnote for a mathematical exponent. The number is quadrillion. Otherwise it would be another number. The suit is referencing a footnote with the calculations.

[GOPJ]

Democrats won EVERY mid-term race in 2018 that was polled as 'too close to call'...

What would Rutgers Professor Charles J. Cicchetti say about that...

(EVERY RACE "TOO CLOSE TO CALL" IN 2018 WENT TO DEMOCRATS...)

[pas]

Did every state he “won” have relaxed mail ballots to all registered voters rules? They had to wait to find out who voted in person to create the votes from those who didn’t mail in the vote or show up in person.

[Lonesome in Massachussets]

A quadrillion to the fourth power is:

1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

You’re welcome.

[Tilted Irish Kilt]

FlipWilson :".. Ha, case dismissed under the new rules of “in your face a-hole!!”
You have no case because agal labal flabble gazabble babble.
Ruling first, trial later which will be never under our ruling.
You can’t prove it and we won’t let you so you can’t prove it."

I enjoy your eloquence !
However the truth cannot, ethically, be denied indefinitely.
Did you previously work at the Department of " JUST- US " ?? Keep up the good work !

[gw-ington]

Democrats won EVERY mid-term race in 2018 that was polled as 'too close to call'...

Republicans still don't get it!

Democrats have brilliantly cracked the inscrutable laws of probability. It's not just dumb luck. Democrats have repeatedly proven themselves extremely proficient at being incomprehensibly lucky. The key is that shrewd Democrats never leave luck to chance.

/s

[Tilted Irish Kilt]

See my Post #29 to Flip Wilson
Not true,.. but accurate!!
I would suggest that the list of polling of "too close to call"
was, in fact, a directive where fraud efforts should be directed.

If it looks like it ,
smells like it,
and draws flies,
it'sahit

[GOPJ]

In the old world that many think we are still in, rules matter. Standard of proof, laws, evidence, Election rules, etc., they all matter. ... In the New World the left and the establishment are just in charge. They saw Donald Trump killing their privilege and payola. They saw masses supporting that. They simply decided to kick over the table and declare the game over. The old rules don’t apply.

You're right.

[Maurice Tift]

We should have win the mid terms too. This insane democrat congress should have never been.

[GOPJ]

The key is that shrewd Democrats never leave luck to chance.

I was a democrat precinct person decades ago - I know how they cheat. You're right - they don't leave their luck to chance. If the race is 'too close to call' they use voter fraud to take the win. Keeps their lucky streak going.

[JayAr36]

Lets not forget the (DOCE)Democrat Organization of Criminality. With their deomcrooks around the country leaning all the way socialist and the criminal element involved I wonder if America has a chance any more.

[Osage Orange]

I’ve seen one flip of the coin..that was neither heads or tails. Stuck in the ground.

[PIF]

What would Rutgers Professor Charles J. Cicchetti say about that...
—
That 2002, 2004, 2006, 2008, 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016, 2018 were tabulated and counted more and more by electronic tabulators and voting machines until they perfected the system in 2020 - after which there was no longer any need for citizens to vote in the USA.

[GOPJ]

You’re right.

[PIF]

So...there IS a chance.
—
Yep there is. There’s a chance that I might win the Power Ball lottery despite not having bought a ticket ... ever. The same chance all this blab blah legal beagle eagle blah jiberjaber wocky wacky has of state legislators of changing their slate of electors for DJT.

[GOPJ]

Thanks...