Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arizona Supreme Court unanimously affirms Biden's win in state
https://tucson.com/news/local/arizona-supreme-court-unanimously-affirms-bidens-win-in-state/article_4a5758a7-db8d-52f9-9237-2c0c4b0550ac.html#tracking-source=home-top-story-1 ^ | 12/8/20 | Howard Fischer

Posted on 12/08/2020 5:29:52 PM PST by Nero Germanicus

The Arizona Supreme Court late Tuesday threw out the bid by the head of the state Republican Party to void the results of the presidential race.

In a unanimous ruling, the justices said that party Chairwoman Kelli Ward failed to present any evidence of misconduct or illegal votes in the tally that found Joe Biden outpolled President Trump in Arizona.

Chief Justice Robert Brutinel, writing for the court, said Ward, who has the burden of proof when challenging an election, provided no evidence that the electors pledged to Trump got more votes than those pledged to Biden, “let alone (to) establish any degree of fraud or a sufficient error rate that would undermine the certainty of the election results.”

Brutinel acknowledged, as did the trial judge, that there were some errors made when damaged or ballots with extra marks had to be redone by hand so they could be fed through counting machines.

But he said a random check of 1,626 of these ballots ordered by the trial court found an error rate of as little as 0.37% or as much 0.55%.

Extrapolating that out to the 27,869 ballots that had to be duplicated, Brutinel said it would have gained Trump just 103 votes or, at best, 153 votes, “neither of which is sufficient to call the election results into question.” https://tucson.com/news/local/arizona-supreme-court-unanimously-affirms-bidens-win-in-state/article_4a5758a7-db8d-52f9-9237-2c0c4b0550ac.html#tracking-source=home-top-story-1

(Excerpt) Read more at tucson.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: barf; puke; throwup; vomit
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: nwrep

I imagine she did use that but the courts are just throwing the cases out. All the other states with cases are saying the same thing when there is plenty of evidence of fraud the courts are not listening.


41 posted on 12/08/2020 6:41:52 PM PST by funfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

No.


42 posted on 12/08/2020 6:43:24 PM PST by funfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: WashingtonSource

“Oh my God. What tyrants and traitors in black robes!”

Yes! They have been there for a while.


43 posted on 12/08/2020 6:43:45 PM PST by foundedonpurpose (Praise Hashem, for his restoration of all things!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Meatspace

We need other states to join the Texas suit.


44 posted on 12/08/2020 6:45:17 PM PST by foundedonpurpose (Praise Hashem, for his restoration of all things!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: nwrep

She (Ward) /they did - the Court ruled that there was no evidence of fraud i.e. somebody caught in the act like in other states, etc., so therefore it’s speculative to think that all of the votes that would necessarily be thrown out went for JoePedo ... seems these folks are all bribed & blackmailed + heard about the car “crash” explosion in GA so they’re not doing anything.


45 posted on 12/08/2020 7:23:30 PM PST by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

WTH? Kansas? Centurian? What happened to fortitude?

You can’t control other people just yourself. Go email the Attorney General of KS and tell him to become part of the Texas lawsuit. (I did.) The more states the better. If he doesn’t at least you dis something.

https://ag.ks.gov/about-the-office/contact-us/email-us


46 posted on 12/08/2020 7:55:18 PM PST by Pete from Shawnee Mission ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.

Steven;

White Cane Judges. There is no one so blind as the willfully blind.

At least Kelli Ward tried. Maybe this speeds up an appeal to The SC?


47 posted on 12/08/2020 8:09:24 PM PST by Pete from Shawnee Mission ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Pete from Shawnee Mission

Off to bed.


48 posted on 12/08/2020 8:10:36 PM PST by Pete from Shawnee Mission ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Pete from Shawnee Mission

I am sure off to SCOTUS toot sweet.


49 posted on 12/08/2020 8:53:48 PM PST by little jeremiah (Thirst for truth is the most valuable possession and no one can take it away from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

“We have too much to lose by enacting a just and fair punishment on our enemies as they deserve.”

Do you see the folly in this ?


50 posted on 12/09/2020 8:50:04 AM PST by Celerity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: enumerated
Why do you think AZ isn’t listed in the Texas lawsuit?

Because AZ did not have the same issues as those four States, which is why NV and VA aren't included either. Those four all had Governors or Courts that added election 'law' that was not properly approved by their Legislatures. Whereas AZ/NV/VA/etc are simply cases of election fraud, which has been much more touchy-feely with the courts.
51 posted on 12/09/2020 4:05:35 PM PST by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Svartalfiar

That makes sense - Thanks


52 posted on 12/09/2020 4:10:32 PM PST by enumerated
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
Three of the four can be magnanimous, and avoid some Democrat rioting, by allocating the EVs 50-50. If only one of the bigger 3 (PA, MI, GA) deny their EVs to Biden, by not certifying, or by giving the set to Trump, then Biden fails to get to 270 by Monday, and the 12th Amendment kicks in for the second time ever (1824, John Quincy Adams).
If MI, GA, and WI all go 50-50, and PA goes to Trump, that gives a 265-273 Trump win. If PA simply fails to certify, that gives Biden a 265-253 win.

If GA or MI is the flip and the other three go 50-50, Trump wins 271-267.

If WI is the solo flip, then Biden barely gets the win right at 270-268. There is no math with these four that sends it to the House, unless one of the States goes 11-5 or something like that to cause a tie. If all four just fail to certify, Biden wins 244-232. Trump has to gain votes from this, and he has to fully flip at least three of these States.
53 posted on 12/09/2020 4:15:50 PM PST by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Svartalfiar

“..... If PA simply fails to certify, that gives Biden a 265-253 win. ..”

No Biden would have failed to reach 270. It would go to the House, a potential Trump win.


54 posted on 12/09/2020 4:24:51 PM PST by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Pete from Shawnee Mission

Emailed a second time.

https://twitter.com/ksagoffice?lang=en

“Kansas AG’s Office
@KSAGOffice
·
4h
AG Derek Schmidt: Kansas asks U.S. Supreme Court to hear Texas election lawsuit https://ag.ks.gov/media-cente


55 posted on 12/09/2020 5:11:58 PM PST by Pete from Shawnee Mission ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Reily
“..... If PA simply fails to certify, that gives Biden a 265-253 win. ..”

No Biden would have failed to reach 270. It would go to the House, a potential Trump win.


If a State fails to appoint electors, that drops the 270. Winning is a majority of electors appointed, not total possible electors. Therefore if PA fails to appoint any, the total electors appointed drops to 518, meaning 260 is then the majority number to win.
56 posted on 12/09/2020 6:10:01 PM PST by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: enumerated
That makes sense - Thanks

Yup. You'll notice that the TX suit makes no arguments based on any election fraud, it's just the Constitutional issues in this one.

Election fraud cases can be much more subjective, and are apparently very difficult to understand for most judges.
57 posted on 12/09/2020 6:12:21 PM PST by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Svartalfiar

Disenfranchising voters - unequal protection - violating the constitution -

Whether you call it fraud or not is semantics


58 posted on 12/09/2020 6:18:00 PM PST by enumerated
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

The clouds are thickening, the wind is starting to blow!
Another suit seeking shelter in the Supreme Court!


59 posted on 12/09/2020 6:19:45 PM PST by Pete from Shawnee Mission ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Svartalfiar

I don’t think thats correct.

Show me the Constitution where that’s correct.

If a state fails to appoint the electors the requisite total of electors is still there. The state simply failed in its duty to produce its share thus failed to vote. Your example would only be true if the state left the country. The Constitution still leaves a solution - the House !


60 posted on 12/09/2020 6:51:37 PM PST by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson