[Reno89519]

Okay, puts them on the spot but I still figure Robert’s will thread the needle, say constitution violated but votes stand as voters must be respected.

[RummyChick]

Tricia Flanagan (R-NJ) For U.S. Senate
@NewDayForNJ
·
Dec 5
Justice Alito’s ruling has many nervous regarding ‘Safe Harbor Day’ BUT there is judicial precedence where certification has been overturned & EC votes awarded to real winner—JFK won Hawaii after originally awarded to Nixon.

Reversal came on Dec 27th AFTER Dec 8 Safe Harbor Day!

[conservativepoet]

He’ll lose. If it violates the constitution, then voters were disrespected.

[RatRipper]

You are NOT respecting voters if fraudulent votes are counted . . . quite the opposite!!!!

[dirtboy]

We no longer need Roberts.

[ealgeone]

He’s about as reliable as the wind. I have ZERO trust in Roberts.

[Vendome]

Roberts slept with Christine Fang...

[pgkdan]

Okay, puts them on the spot but I still figure Robert’s will thread the needle, say constitution violated but votes stand as voters must be respected.

So what? He's only 1 vote. We have 5 others.

[DiogenesLamp]

Okay, puts them on the spot but I still figure Robert’s will thread the needle, say constitution violated but votes stand as voters must be respected.

Siding with fake voters is not respecting real voters.

[M. Thatcher]

I still figure Robert’s will thread the needle

Roberts no longer has power.

Alito, Thomas, Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, Barrett are a majority without him.

[djpg]

“Okay, puts them on the spot but I still figure Robert’s will thread the needle, say constitution violated but votes stand as voters must be respected.“

Very perceptive.

[katieanna]

Respectfully, the less attention given Roberts the better. He’s no factor anymore. I don’t care what he does, frankly; as long as we have the ‘constitutional five’. BTW, five is the number of Grace, so there you go!

[MyDogAteMyBallot]

he’ll find some half-a**ed logic to vote with the libs.
Not sure we can count on Kavanaugh either. Inconsistency of rulings has never been an issue for Roberts.

[eeriegeno]

Okay, puts them on the spot but I still figure Robert’s will thread the needle, say constitution violated but votes stand as voters must be respected.

So how will Roberts justify disenfranchising 75+ million voters?

[RipSawyer]

Once he voted to uphold Obamacare on the basis that the penalty for failing to insure as an individual was a tax when it had been called a fine all along he lost ALL credibility. I see no reason why, based on that ruling, there is anything the government cannot do to us simply by imposing a “tax”. What would stop the congress from passing a law requiring every American to purchase a quart of milk or a pint of whiskey every week with a tax to be imposed for failure to comply?