Posted on 12/07/2020 7:51:25 AM PST by knighthawk
Judge: “By switching on the restaurant’s kitchen lights , revealing roaches and rats running all over, you undermined faith in sanitation.”
How can anyone conclude that NOT ALLOWING ONE CANDIDATE TO CHEAT somehow disenfranchises that candidate’s minority of lawful voters?
The forensic examination took place Sunday with Bailey, Antrim County Clerk Sheryl Guy, county administrator Pete Garwood, county attorney Haider Kazim, three county commissioners, a county IT technician and a member of the Sheriff’s department, said county spokesman Jeremy Scott in a release.
Also present, according to Scott, were seven members of the Allied Security Operations Group, a group affiliated with Trump’s litigation team. In the court order, the evidence cited by Bailey comes from a report from the group.
The Democratic process is the theft.
Judge needs to disciplined from her seat!
Yet doesn’t conclude there wasn’t fraud? Kangaroo Court. Imagine this, the bank lacks standing, the money was spent and the charges undermine the public’s trust in banking....therefore, the case against the bank robber is dismissed.....in a scathing rebuke.
Democrat presidents are entitled to their picks, republicans, not so much says Linda.
In a 36-page ruling, federal Judge Linda V. Parker finds the suit filed by Sidney Powell as part of her ‘Kraken’ lawsuits, lacks standing, proposes a remedy it is far too late to enforce – and critically undermines ‘faith in the democratic process.’
—
Translation. You are not allowed to question or inspect the state of the current voting process. And it’s too late anyway (i.e. we got away with it).
I wonder how many repubs voted to confirm obama judges like this
yeah...I’ve been of that mindset for most of my life.....but that has changed in this cycle.
Another affirmative action judge.
Approved by 60 yay votes including 7 repubs; https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=113&session=2&vote=00071#position
Their filing came too late, and after key state deadlines spelled out in election law had passed.Plaintiffs ask this Court to ignore the orderly statutory scheme established to challenge elections...
The election was only a month ago. How can the time for challenging the results in court be passed?
It is so easy to dismiss the overwhelming evidence provided, when you do not look at it. The allegations of fraud had substance; the affidavits were provided by witnesses with courage; the number of illegal votes were far beyond the margin of the false victory by Biden.
It is sad that the USA has so many activist judges who can sweep away with a twist of the wrist volumes of evidence, and reward the perpetrators of the fraud. What kind of justice is that?
Thanks. I was about to shout that same thing.
I don’t understand some of these “standing” rules. Every American citizen should have standing here. Their rights to vote have been trampled.
Justice isn’t blind. Justice is a RAT.
We’ll see how far that argument gets with Alito.
It’s too late to lose faith in the vote. So exposing the fraud and hopefully install measures to stop it would cause people to lose faith in the vote???
Corrupt judges need consequences for their sedition.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.