Posted on 12/04/2020 7:00:07 PM PST by SeekAndFind
Attorney Sidney Powell says there’s plenty of time for President Donald Trump’s legal team to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election.
“With the fraud case, the Dec. 8 deadline doesn’t apply,” Powell said Friday during an appearance on Newsmax TV’s “Stinchfield” in reference to the “safe harbor” deadline that frees a state from further challenge if it resolves all disputes and certifies its voting results.
“We have at least until Dec. 14,” she said.
“We might file more suits. The court in Michigan or Wisconsin today just gave us a great order recognizing that. These are not pure election contests we are filing. These are massive fraud suits that can set aside the results of the election due to this fraud at any time. The states should not be certifying election results in the face of it.”
Powell, a former member of Trump’s legal team, has been a part of multiple lawsuits in a crusade to overturn results from the 2020 election.
Several states have certified Joe Biden as the winner of the election. Newsmax has yet to project a winner as Trump continues to contest the results in court.
The Wisconsin Supreme Court on Friday said it wouldn’t accept a lawsuit by Trump’s legal team, sidestepping a decision on the merits of the claims and instead ruling that the case must first wind its way through the lower courts.
The president asked the court to disqualify more than 221,000 ballots in the state’s two biggest Democrat counties, alleging irregularities in the way absentee ballots were administered.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...
Sidney, with all due respect: BULL SHIT!
Relax, Art—these dates will be here soon enough—we will see where we are at that point.
Jay Sekulow said the same thing as Sidney on his show today.
I trust her more than I do many. That is for sure.
I support DJT using any and all means necessary to correct this election theft, including, but not limited to extraconstitutional means.
I support DJT using any and all means necessary to correct this election theft, including, but not limited to extraconstitutional means.
I support DJT using any and all means necessary to correct this election theft, including, but not limited to extraconstitutional means.
She and others are working to get an honest vote count untainted by fraud.
It may seem like a trivial bit of semantics, but there's a big difference and how it will play across the land. Seeking truth and justice is a lot different than overturning results.
I love how Sidney just tears up Raffensperger for his lies. I agree with her, Raffensperger needs to be arrested for his crimes.
He is revealing the true ones.
Bttt
Martial law until a new firmly controlled and regulated election with a KNOWN number of votes and a KNOWN number of ballots issued only to those who are eligible and request them....
You sure you’re on the right site?
Yup—”overturn the fraudulent results” is better, but if I were drafting it I would go with:
“Restore voting rights and protections to the American people by disqualifying fraudulent votes and punishing those who created and accepted them.”
Nurse Ratchet-lol/.
Might be a tad wordy, but that nails it. Or “Stopping the disenfranchisement of 80 million Americans.”
Libs just LOVE her work “disenfranchisement.”
My view on martial law is that it should be used to “stop the clock” while several things happen:
—Full forensic audit of the votes in all swing states (including some not currently discussed like NH, VA, NM etc.)
—Identification and indictment of all fraudsters in all states, and removal of those actors from the audit process (that means holding in a jail cell....)
—Removal of any state officers (governors, secretaries of state, state legislative leaders) who failed to meet their responsibilities to conduct a fraud free election (and yes, jail for them too).
If it is possible to reasonably ascertain the election results at that point, that would be the best case scenario—but if that is not feasible, then, yeah, a new election (with all bad actors already behind bars) could be held.
She’s correct
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.