Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Hearing on FBI's Crossfire Hurricane Investigation
C-SPAN ^ | December 3, 2020 | Senator Ron Johnson

Posted on 12/04/2020 2:41:29 AM PST by Cboldt

Sorry for linking to video only. I caught this by serendipity. Things other than the election are still going on, and this hearing had a few interesting moments.

C-SPAN all-caps real-time "transcription" converted to all lowercase for readability.

C-SPAN description: The Senate Homeland Security Committee held a hearing on congressional oversight of the FBI�s Crossfire Hurricane investigation into possible ties between the 2016 Trump campaign and Russian officials. The hearing also focused on perceived bias of media organizations and social media platforms against conservative viewpoints. Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI) chaired the hearing that featured testimony from investigative journalists Sharyl Attkisson and Lee Smith as well as former FBI official Kevin Brock. After Ranking Member Gary Peters (D-MI) delivered his opening statement, no Democrats participated in the hearing.

Senator Johnson:

you just set me up for my next question. i appreciate that. and i appreciate you participating in these hearings. we didn't have a lot of senators, some democratic senators blingked on and off, and they're not particularly inquisitive.

i made this comment a number of times, this point, that when it comes to investigations of wrong doing. we do with backwards. how long it took for us to get this level. and we're a long way from fully understanding this because of the resistance, the obstruction. but i would argue that the order of investigation ought to start, again this is investigates within the political realm. wrong doing there. it should start with congressional investigations.

congress ought to have access to all of the investigation. i can't tell you how many times the excuse has been give ton me when we asked things even under subpoena. we have john durham, he doesn't want you to interfere with his investigation. the way that this should work is that because from my standpoint, it is so far more important to expose this, so that the public understands what happened, to provide that accountability of public awareness as a deternltsrent as opposed to a criminal prosecution. i think that congress needs to investigation all of the access to all of the information and then if we see the potential the cases referred to the justice didn't.

so we have done this backwards. here we are four years later and we're only now starts to uncover the extent of the corruption and the corruption is incredibly troubling. it should have troubled every member of congress, every u.s. senator, every member of this committee, but it doesn't. apparently corruption is partisan. if it is corruption on the side of your party, not worried about it. i'm worried about it regardless. so i want to ask you the question, really, how much should it hamper a criminal investigation if congress had the same information?


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: crossfirehurricane; fbi; russia; senate
Above is an excerpt but not flagged as such, in case it runs over the 300 word limit. In this part of the hearing, senator Johnon has a great idea for piecring the abuse of investigatory secrecy to hide corruption and malfeasance.

As far as "how important" is this hearing, it's not important at all. That said, if you have time, want a break from election, the tenor of this is unlike any other hearing I've watched. Kevin Brock comes off as forthright about the FBI. He has no praise, and he worked there at a high level.

1 posted on 12/04/2020 2:41:29 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Talk talk talk talk talk talk................no one indicted, prosecuted or jailed since papa bush


2 posted on 12/04/2020 2:54:28 AM PST by ronnie raygun ( Massive mistakes are made by arrogant fools; massive evils are committed by evil people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Too little, too late. As severe as the Russian hoax was, the emphasis should be now on election theft. These people are idiots.


3 posted on 12/04/2020 3:16:54 AM PST by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Thanks


4 posted on 12/04/2020 3:57:32 AM PST by nuconvert ( Warning: Accused of being a radical militarist. Approach with caution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

What 300 word limit?


5 posted on 12/04/2020 3:58:55 AM PST by sauropod (Let them eat kale. I will not comply. Sic semper evello mortem tyrannis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Brock, of the FBI who is testifying, states: it was a hijacking of the FBI. So can we now expect Comey and the other higher ups to face criminal charges any time soon? Rhetorical question, as I know the answer is no.


6 posted on 12/04/2020 4:02:04 AM PST by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
Headline 2020: “Senate Meets This Week To Investigate Weaknesses In Pearl Harbor Defenses In Light Of Japanese Attack in December, 1941.”
7 posted on 12/04/2020 4:17:34 AM PST by SkyPilot ("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
-- What 300 word limit? --

During a "post" of a new thread, there is a "this is an excerpt" button or option. If that is toggled ON, then the FR software does a word count on the article part of the OP.

I've done excerpt posts and trigged this. The fix is to go back to the article part of the post and remove parts.

8 posted on 12/04/2020 4:28:45 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong
-- So can we now expect Comey and the other higher ups to face criminal charges any time soon? Rhetorical question, as I know the answer is no. --

Abuse of power isn't a crime, per se. And very little in the way of leaking classified material is a crime. The government and press can lie to the public, not a crime.

It's up to the public to mete out justice to those who abuse their power and authority, because the government will not check abuses that it perpetrates against the people. "When the FBI does it, it isn't a crime" sort of thing, but that applies across the board.

9 posted on 12/04/2020 4:33:01 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: odawg
-- Too little, too late. --

That was one of the issues brought up. The FBI, Wray personally, has been stonewalling and protecting corruption. Johnson suggested a change in the law (Congress makes the laws) so that "ongoing investigation" does not trump the public's right to know. That's a fairly radical thought.

Tangentially brought up was rewriting law so that people who are deplatformed or stifled from legal speech can sue for money damages.

Note that legal speech can be false statements. The 1st amendment protects speech, period, not just true speech. The boundaries of speech are defamation, incitement (tough to do in writing), and disclosing information relating to cryptography, military capability or action plans, and identity of spies.

10 posted on 12/04/2020 4:38:50 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

I was unaware of this. Thank you.


11 posted on 12/04/2020 4:41:23 AM PST by sauropod (Let them eat kale. I will not comply. Sic semper evello mortem tyrannis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ronnie raygun

>Talk talk talk talk talk talk................no one indicted, prosecuted or jailed since papa bush<

The only people they need to bring before the senate is Barr and Durham. All the evidence is already out there for everyone to see. Has been for years now.

What good does it do to bring people in that have already colluded with one another to hide and mislead?


12 posted on 12/04/2020 5:04:51 AM PST by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

You Republicans are WAY TOO DAMNED NICE AND SLOW!!! The DEMONCRATS would have had 25 people in PRISON for YEARS by now!


13 posted on 12/04/2020 5:44:23 AM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ronnie raygun

You can’t push a rope. All the rats, media, and half of the GOP are fine with DOJ/FBI/CIA criminality directed at President Trump and his supporters.

Should The Pretender Biden take office, the US will have finally slipped from a republic to an oligarchy, an oligarchy that holds pointless elections.


14 posted on 12/04/2020 5:49:52 AM PST by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Well, in actuality they could be charged with Malfeasance in office, but they won’t be. Remember, no one is above the law, at least in theory at any rate. 8>P


15 posted on 12/04/2020 6:02:56 AM PST by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson