Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Warning: Renowned Virologist Sucharit Bhakdi Warns Against Hastily Created Gene-Altering Coronavirus Vaccine (Video)
RAIR Foundation USA ^ | On September 25, 2020 | Posted by Renee Nal

Posted on 12/03/2020 8:33:25 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum

Although from a scientific standpoint, the development of a vaccine usually takes at least four to five years. That’s the standard, scientifically. Now with Corona, suddenly it will be ready in few months and it’s supposed to be a safe vaccine. The Austrian health minister says in all seriousness we could have a safe inoculation as early as January. So far, the mainstream media haven’t questioned that, and say, “Yes, yes, it will be relatively safe with relatively few side effects.” Are politics and the media already completely corrupted by the pharmaceutical industry, Professor?

I don’t know, but what I don’t understand is the statement that the vaccine is so urgently needed. Now I will ask the audience a question in return: Do you know how many people under the age of 70 have died from COVID 19? As a percentage? That means, out of 1000 people under 70 who were infected, how many died? You won’t be able to find the answer, because you’ll only get an answer if you search the reports from the RKI [Robert Koch Institute] and calculate the number yourself.

These figures are not available. So then I will tell you that if you calculate how many COVID-19 deaths there have been among the total number of people under the age of 70, it was about 185,000 under the age of 70 who were infected. That means that most of them were young and under 70, because the total number was 230,000. The rest were older than 70.

Among these 0 to 70 years, 0.7 percent died with and from COVID-19. 0.7 percent died. That means 99.3 percent did NOT die. Most of them were not seriously ill at all.

In America, it is now known that about 6% of the people were COVID victims, they are real victims. It was published by the CDC. The rest, the 94%, had serious pre-existing conditions. So, if you take Germany, well, let’s say 10% were real, then we are at 0.07% of real victims. That’s 99.93. Okay? So, I can tell you I will never get vaccinated.

I might be over 70, but I don’t have any pre-existing conditions, and if I wanted to, I wouldn’t die unless I threw myself down the stairs, out of desperation.

I’m not saying that SARS-COV-2 is harmless. No. I never said that. It’s about as dangerous as an influenza virus. A seasonal, moderate flu. What I am saying is that the most at risk are those over 70 with severe pre-existing conditions. So, if you say, we should protect them, I’m right there with you and that’s good.

We have to do that. We should want to protect them. But how?

Then the question is: Should we vaccinate them? I would say yes, but these vaccines better be tested damned well for safety, especially because this vaccine will be used primarily on older sick people and not on young healthy people.

So, twelve months is not enough time for that. Not even five years. Certainly not. And that just applies to conventional vaccines.

What we are dealing with in Europe, in Germany, Austria, is a completely new kind of vaccine. This vaccine is gene-based. This isn’t a normal conventional vaccine, and it’s not like the flu vaccine. The way this gene-based vaccine works is still unknown scientifically and medically. The impact of which has a very high-risk potential. —This is also a very central point, of which I do not think many people are aware. For many years, we have experienced this massive protest movement against genetic manipulation in our food.

In particular, the Green Party has been fighting for years against genetically manipulated food coming onto the market, especially in Europe. So now we’re talking about a vaccination that genetically manipulates the human body, and apparently these same people have no concerns about it.

I can’t understand that either. I can’t understand that. And I don’t want to understand it. I don’t want to accept it. You can’t say, ‘Oh! This virus is so dangerous, that we now have to do away with everything or else it will wipe us all out.’

You know this gene-based vaccine. I’m going to tell you a little bit about it, because as I understand it, Mrs. Merkel has reserved 54 million doses of this gene-based vaccine from the British company. In Austria as well. Six million doses were ordered for a total population of eight million. —Yes.

How can they do that? How can they do that? And they even do it with our tax money to boot. And it’s not just that, because they advertise for this vaccination almost daily. They call it harmless. They call it safe.

Just this Tuesday, a few Austrian media outlets announced the latest gag: ‘The vaccination will be free!’ The government will carry the costs. I read that in the newspaper today. I saw that in the newspaper, yes. The government pays with our tax money, at least I think so; I don’t know if they have secret accounts or something somewhere.

So now getting back to our topic: When a virus produces a protein in one of our cells, it produces waste. It is like building a house, and there’s waste produced in the process. This waste is hung outside the door as a sign or placed in front of the door as garbage. This waste is recognized by lymphocytes, including killer lymphocytes, which we all have.

They recognize the waste of this coronavirus as coronavirus waste because these lymphocytes have met other coronaviruses. Maybe last year or the year before last. These lymphocytes have a long memory. I pointed out in the book that these killer lymphocytes are probably the reason why [we remain healthy], probably.

If you or I have or get a SARS-COV-2 infection, and it really goes into my cells, it reproduces itself. The waste produced by this process is put outside the door of my lung cell, and then this killer lymphocyte cell from previous years recognizes the diseased cells and kills the cell. That’s how the fire is put out. The factory is destroyed and the viruses are no longer produced and the person recovers and is healthy again. That’s the mechanism; that’s the main mechanism of recovery with a SARS-COV-2 infection.

It’s the same in cases of flu infection, by the way. This is a principle of immunology. I believe it has always worked and that’s the reason why we as adults are relatively well-protected. If you are under 70 and not seriously ill from anything else, the fires are practically always extinguished. On the other hand, if you’re foolish enough to inject the gene of the virus, and it goes somewhere else, where it does not belong, it will produce waste there. Then the killer lymphocytes won’t recognize that it is only the gene that was injected and not the virus.

It will go there anyway and kill these cells. That’s what we call an autoimmune reaction. How and where these autoimmune reactions will happen, nobody knows. Tests for that have never been done. The pharmaceutical industry never considered that something like that could happen. If you go through the literature and examine what reactions the vaccine that have been sold caused, you’ll find a study from early August. They were in phase 2, and a relatively small number of English volunteers were vaccinated.

In 20% to 25% of the cases, the side effects were so extreme that people had enormous swelling, fever, chills, headache, aching limbs, muscle aches, and were so sick that they could not stand it. So this is obviously a sign of how they are trying to manipulate us through the media. In that article from Tuesday, with the headline: ‘There should be a free vaccination’. There was also an interview with a pharma lobbyist who said the exact opposite and denied it.

She said all the previous vaccine tests had no serious side effects. I consider that reprehensible. Now I’m getting angry. That can’t be possible. That’s lying.

You have to read this study. It’s published in Lancet. OK? What the English did, in Oxford, because the side effects were so severe, from that point on, all the subsequent test subjects for the vaccine were given a high dose of paracetamol [acetaminophen].

That’s a fever-reducing painkiller. You know? An antipyretic painkiller. Paracetamol in high doses. And then… In response to the vaccination? —No. To prevent the reaction. That means they received the painkiller first and then the vaccination afterwards. Unbelievable.

This way they could say that the vaccine was well-tolerated. After that, in the following weeks and months, they managed to get the Indian government to announce that we would be conducting the next phase in India. Not just in India. In other places as well.

I believe 3,000 young people in India will allow themselves to be vaccinated with this gene-based vaccine, and I’m sure the result will be celebrated with a big “hurray!” and the claim that they tolerated it well.

So, ladies and gentlemen, do you want your mother or grandmother who is 70 or 75 years old with a pre-existing condition to receive such a vaccine? They can’t want that. Or would you do that to yourself as someone younger than 70 years old? Before you do, you have to get a shot of paracetamol so you won’t have side effects? What for? What for?

Let me tell you this: I won’t be able to upload this video within the next five days because if I did, it would deleted right away, for what I just said.

Professor, there’s one topic that is continually brought up: The Swedish method. The Swedish took a completely different path from most countries. One of very few. It is one of the only countries in the world that didn’t impose lockdowns. 85 percent of the Swedish population supported this method.

However, what the health authorities admit is that they didn’t pay enough attention to risk groups the first few weeks.

—Yes. The elderly and those living in nursing homes. They admit it. That’s also a general topic when Corona is being discussed. The risk group of people with pre-existing conditions and older people. What do you say in reaction to this whole discussion about the high-risk group of people over 65 or 70 years of age?

Over 70 years, not 65. At least over 70, with pre-existing conditions, please. Sure. That was the case. Sweden didn’t really do a good job protecting people in nursing homes and old folks’ homes. There were several reasons why this was the case. Our Swedish friends tell us that many foreigners who work in these Swedish nursing homes were not able to speak proper Swedish. They couldn’t read and understand all these rules, precautions, and didn’t follow them. That’s what Sweden admits as well.

The most important thing in the future, no matter whether it is the flu or Corona, is to regulate access and visits to these vulnerable people very strictly.

With a mask, yes, sure, why not?

Disinfected hands. Yes, that’s all right.

Principally these are measures that already had been applied to the flu. —Yes! —If you went to an old folks’ home and it was flu season, you also had to pay attention to these measures. —Yes. That’s it. We say this clearly and concisely in the book. People don’t like that, and that’s why our videos are constantly being deleted. All this isn’t necessary.

Just stop it. Why not turn our attention to reasonable, important things? Restore the economy and get the culture back on its feet.

Culture has been ruined. The schools — education has been ruined. The elderly people are still lonely because they can’t have visitors. This can’t be true. We have a relative, this is a personal story now, The had a heart attack. All five of us weren’t allowed to visit him.

That’s not permitted. What is this nonsense? The topic of collateral damage from serious illnesses, heart attacks, badly treated cancer patients, unemployment, mental illness leading to suicide. —Suicide. —This is now a taboo subject at this point.

Yes, but Mr. Steinmeier says we shouldn’t talk about it, because that would be irresponsible. Do you understand that?

You have… —This is so ridiculous and so crazy and so irresponsible from politicians. I’ll say it point-blank. Everyone’s trust in politicians has been lost. You simply can’t do this. There’s another question we are often asked besides the number of the seriously ill among the dead.

As I have said already several times, fortunately the death toll is continuously decreasing. However, according to some media reports in the past few weeks, there are increasing numbers of long-term consequences for corona patients.

What is your opinion on that from a professional point of view? —From a professional point of view, it isn’t possible to form an opinion, because there are no data at all.

And no studies. If you want to study long-term effects, you will probably have to do it for a longer time. —That’s a matter of years. —Yes, my God, to start fantasizing now that there might be long-term consequences, that’s following this agenda of the Federal Ministry of the Interior. You know the document that went viral in March of this year, from the Corona Committee in the German Interior ministry. A protocol was written on how to manage the crisis during a time of crisis.

The consensus was that fear had to be created. The first step in creating fear was by not counting or announcing how many died, because there would be too few. Instead, only the number of the infected would be announced. Secondly, people, especially the elderly, had to be made to understand that without ventilation, death would occur by slow suffocation.

A drowning death.

To imagine suffocating slowly to death is one of the most horrible thoughts about death that someone could have. That stirs up fear. Then we have to tell the children that they will bring the disease to their parents and kill their parents and kill their grandparents. That’s how they control everyone.

And one last thing, buckle up, we have to talk about possible long-term damages, which are of course unknown. We can and must convey that since this is a new form of disease, we therefore cannot know if there are long-term consequences, but you can start to imagine all kinds of things. Now let me tell you something: after we read this, we were really angry and we’re still angry now. These pathologists in Germany, who supposedly say, ‘That’s right, the virus goes here, there, and everywhere. The virus can go different places.’

All viruses that infect the respiratory system can also appear in many other organs. This has been known a long time. Even in the brain, but it does not mean that they are doing something there. The quantity is important. You know, having a few viruses here and there doesn’t mean they do anything at all. Before you can draw conclusions, You’d better have damned good data to back it up, and that takes years of research.

So please, don’t believe these fantasies. It could happen, but the probability that it WON’T happen is much higher.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: covidvaccine; genealtering
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

1 posted on 12/03/2020 8:33:25 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Do you want zombies? Because this is how you get zombies. ;^)


2 posted on 12/03/2020 8:40:27 AM PST by Dalberg-Acton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

WARNING—

I just went to this link. Got an alert for a virus threat.


3 posted on 12/03/2020 8:42:19 AM PST by TurkeyLurkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
There are many vaccines being tested. Which one is he talking about?

Although from a scientific standpoint, the development of a vaccine usually takes at least four to five years. That’s the standard, scientifically.

Was this standard set before DNA sequencing? That's like comparing the difference between building with cut stones and plumb bobs versus building with reinforced concrete and laser levels. One you take what you are given and maybe tweak it some, the other you can actually design.

4 posted on 12/03/2020 8:59:08 AM PST by KarlInOhio (The greatest threat to world freedom is the Chinese Communist Party and Joe Biden is their puppet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

Development of a vaccine taking 4-5 years was the standard in the 1990s. In the 1960s it was a decade or more. In 2003 it took 2 years to develop the SARS vaccine. In 2014 it took 7 months to develop an Ebola vaccine. In 2016 it was 6 months for Zika. And in 2020 it was 2 months for SARS-CoV-2.

There was no crazy rush. There was no crazy breakthrough. Development has accelerated over the course of the past ~80 years of vaccine creation along a pretty linear path. We went from decades to years to months as we got more tools, better tools, and more experience. The timeline was only a surprise to people who haven’t followed vaccine development.


5 posted on 12/03/2020 9:12:15 AM PST by 2aProtectsTheRest (The media is banging the fear drum enough. Don't help them do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

There is no gene altering happening with any of the vaccines. The mRNA platform has messenger RNA contained in a lipid (fat) shell. The shell is there to merge with the cell membrane so the messenger RNA is released into the cytoplasm (main body) of the cell. Your DNA is not in the cytoplasm. It’s inside the nucleus. There’s no method to transport the mRNA into the nucleus. There’s no method for that mRNA to unravel the double helix of your DNA. There’s no method for that mRNA to make cuts in your DNA. There’s no method for that mRNA to make inserts in your DNA. There’s no method for that mRNA to repair your DNA.

It’s mRNA. That’s not what it does. Messenger RNA simply carries protein building instructions to ribosomes. Ribosomes take the instructions and build proteins. The protein encoded by Moderna and Pfizer’s mRNA is a surface protein present on SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). That protein is harmless by itself, but your body’s immune system sees it as a foreign invader and attacks it. You develop long term immunity based on that response.

The accusation that an mRNA vaccine can alter your DNA is as ridiculous as me claiming I can control nuclear power stations because I have AA batteries at home. Yes, both supply electrical power to devices. But can I control nuclear power stations with AA batteries in my house? No. That’s stupid.


6 posted on 12/03/2020 9:17:12 AM PST by 2aProtectsTheRest (The media is banging the fear drum enough. Don't help them do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/27/dr-anthony-fauci-isnt-particularly-concerned-about-safety-of-moderna-coronavirus-vaccine.html


7 posted on 12/03/2020 9:17:39 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

My problem is Fauci is still living in the stone age and knows absolutely nothing about the characteristics of these New “radical” vaccines.


8 posted on 12/03/2020 9:18:57 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I am not going to et one of these vaccines. Why would I when the HCQ cocktail is 100% safe and cures you in 4-5 days.

Who should I trust; a renowned virologist who has no financial interest in the vaccines, or the people who will get very wealthy pushing it?


9 posted on 12/03/2020 9:24:27 AM PST by WASCWatch ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2aProtectsTheRest
Thank you for posting this! I know it gets tiresome.
10 posted on 12/03/2020 9:25:19 AM PST by mad_as_he$$ (Ted, your slouching again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: WASCWatch

Hundreds of thousands of people have taken the vaccine already.
............
90-95% of them did not get sick when exposed to the virus.
............
Good enough for me.
..........
To all the vaccine bigots, haters and doubters, real simple........don’t get vaccinated. With your last mucous clogged breath, keep saying: I won the Darwin Award.


11 posted on 12/03/2020 9:36:35 AM PST by gandalftb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I wouldn’t take it — not for a couple years, anyhow. It hasn’t been tested on pregnant women; there hasn’t been time. I hope that PDJT’s great vaccine accomplishment doesn’t turn into a monster — and it’ll definitely have his name connected to it then.


12 posted on 12/03/2020 9:38:56 AM PST by MayflowerMadam ("Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free" Galatians 5:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2aProtectsTheRest

All I know for sure is the professional affirmative-action bureaucrat/educrat class and the big-bureaucrat/big-corporate criminal-complex that employs them is corrupt from top-to-bottom.

And that is all I need to know.

I worked as a chemist in the pharmaceutical industry for a dozen years for the only legal manufacturer of narcotics in the USA. Worked on Perdue’s account when we started manufacturing oxycodone for them.

I know first-hand how corrupt it all is.


13 posted on 12/03/2020 10:18:05 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (You are in far more danger from an authoritarian government than you are from a seasonal virus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: gandalftb

I had Covid-19. I found a way to get the HCQ cocktail drugs, and tested negative five days later. Avoided the side effects of the vaccines, too.


14 posted on 12/03/2020 10:25:15 AM PST by WASCWatch ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

mRNA does not alter genes.
it tells a ribosome to make a specific protein.


15 posted on 12/03/2020 10:32:23 AM PST by Kozak (The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The antivax cons stoking up ignorant tools for China.


16 posted on 12/03/2020 11:26:18 AM PST by jonrick46 (Cultural Marxism is the cult of the Left waiting for the Mothership.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WASCWatch

Congrats!!!
.........
I checked locally, the inti-viral drugs are now available here also. The doc I talked to said that they have administered to 10 patients so far. 5 cured, the other 5 are still sick but recovering.


17 posted on 12/03/2020 12:16:55 PM PST by gandalftb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 2aProtectsTheRest
yeah but

https://www.mintpressnews.com/darpa-covid-19-vaccine-implant-mrna/271287/

18 posted on 12/03/2020 1:55:16 PM PST by MurrietaMadman (Keep in mind, the Gates of hell shall not prevail against you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MurrietaMadman
Great example of the gaping disconnect between the science and the idiot journalists reporting on it. For example, the scientist says :

"The real important discovery here was you could now use mRNA, and if you got it into the cells, then you could get the mRNA to express any protein in the cells"

Meaning: if you get messenger RNA inside a cell, you can have the cell produce the encoded proteins. That's a basic description of the entire mRNA platform: you introduce mRNA to a cell, you get the protein you want. In the case of a vaccine for COVID-19, you get the glycoprotein that sits on the surface of SARS-CoV-2. Harmless to your body, but still foreign, which triggers an immune response.

And what does our journalist make of this?

"These molecules are called ‘messenger ribonucleic acid’ or mRNA and the newfound ability to rewrite those instructions to produce any kind of cell within a biological organism has radically changed the course of Western medicine and science"

No. No. No. Wrong. Writing custom mRNA means you can produce a protein molecule. A protein is not a "cell". That's like saying "I bought a nail at the hardware store. Therefore, I'm now a homeowner!" No, genius, just because houses have nails in them does NOT mean that having a nail means you now own a house. Let's look at another example of our ignorant journalist taking something he half-understands (and I promise I'm being very generous there with the half) and turning into a whole new thing radically different from reality.

"Once firmly implanted inside the body, human cells are at the mercy of any mRNA program delivered via this substrate, unleashing a nightmare of possibilities."

What? Since when does a sensor reporting on conditions suddenly have the ability to create and assemble lipid bi-layer shells from nothing, then custom-assemble complex mRNA from nothing, and how does being able to get cells to produce a protein "unleash a nightmare of possibilities"?

"The private company created to market this technology, that allows for biological processes to be controlled remotely and opens the door to the potential manipulation of our biological responses and, ultimately, our entire existence"

What?! Hahaha. Yes, we're all going to sprout wings and become unicorns! And then maybe we can swallow planets and fly to Heaven on the back of a candycane!

Seriously, makes about as much sense as the ridiculous nonsense peddled there. If you want answers, go to the published scientific research. If you want alarmist nonsense peddled by morons, talk to a politician or look at the news.

19 posted on 12/03/2020 2:31:13 PM PST by 2aProtectsTheRest (The media is banging the fear drum enough. Don't help them do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: gandalftb
Hundreds of thousands of people have taken the vaccine already.

Mask sales plummeting!!!

20 posted on 12/03/2020 2:33:40 PM PST by MurrietaMadman (Keep in mind, the Gates of hell shall not prevail against you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson