Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Couple knowingly boards SFO flight to Hawaii after positive COVID-19 tests
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | Dec. 2, 2020 | Amy Graff

Posted on 12/03/2020 6:29:13 AM PST by artichokegrower

A couple learned what happens if you take a flight knowing that you are infected with the coronavirus.

You get arrested

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: coronavirus; covid19
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
The flight originated at San Francisco International Airport where the pair both tested positive for COVID-19. They were told by the Quarantine Station at the airport to isolate and not to board a plane bound for Kauai, but they did anyway.


This is a strange new world we are entering into where your medical records are made public. Isn't this a violation of HIPPA?

1 posted on 12/03/2020 6:29:13 AM PST by artichokegrower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower
This is a strange new world we are entering into where your medical records are made public. Isn't this a violation of HIPPA?

Yes, unless they signed a release.

2 posted on 12/03/2020 6:32:33 AM PST by 1Old Pro ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Give them another test and they’ll probably be negative.

Both the PCR and rapids tests are like flipping a coin.

Their only purpose is to gin up the false-positive numbers so the hysteria can be maintained.


3 posted on 12/03/2020 6:33:46 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (You are in far more danger from an authoritarian government than you are from a seasonal virus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Kill all the bureaucrats.

The pandemic will disappear.


4 posted on 12/03/2020 6:36:12 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (You are in far more danger from an authoritarian government than you are from a seasonal virus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Old news. The thread from yesterday had a lot of outrageous people harrumphing about this invasion of privacy.

They were against this arrest. Unless of course they were also passengers on the plane, then of course arresting that couple was the prudent thing to do.


5 posted on 12/03/2020 6:37:06 AM PST by Responsibility2nd (I will not rest until the American People have the honest vote count they deserve. DJT 11-07-20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Just give them a coffee enema and lock them in the cargo compartment.


6 posted on 12/03/2020 6:37:10 AM PST by chopperk (L)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Not necessarily.

Persons at risk of contracting or spreading a disease. A covered entity may disclose protected health information to a person who is at risk of contracting or spreading a disease or condition if other law authorizes the covered entity to notify such individuals as necessary to carry out public health interventions or investigations. For example, a covered health care provider may disclose protected health information as needed to notify a person that (s)he has been exposed to a communicable disease if the covered entity is legally authorized to do so to prevent or control the spread of the disease. See 45 CFR 164.512(b)(1)(iv).


7 posted on 12/03/2020 6:37:43 AM PST by Spirit of Liberty (It's morning in America again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Spirit of Liberty

Yes, I believe you are correct.


8 posted on 12/03/2020 6:41:17 AM PST by 1Old Pro ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Weren’t they wearing masks? Mask nazis insist we all wear masks to keep us safe from covid. /s


9 posted on 12/03/2020 6:43:17 AM PST by JerryBlackwell (some animals are more equal than others)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Since there’s so many false positives, how can one be sure “they knew they were infected”?


10 posted on 12/03/2020 6:43:26 AM PST by trebb (Fight like your life and future depends on it - because they do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trebb

These are not false positives. People simply don’t understand what that term means. I will gladly concede that a PCR positive does not connote infective state. But falsely positive they are not


11 posted on 12/03/2020 6:54:06 AM PST by gas_dr (Trial lawyers AND POLITICIANS are Endangering Every Patient in America: INCLUDING THEIR LIBERTIES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

As usual, no mention of whether they had any symptoms; so how do we know they were really “infected,”?


12 posted on 12/03/2020 6:54:06 AM PST by Socon-Econ (adical Islam, )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

As usual, no mention of whether they had any symptoms; so how do we know they were really “infected,”?


13 posted on 12/03/2020 6:54:22 AM PST by Socon-Econ (adical Islam, )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

MY BODY MY CHOICE!!!
Besides, were they wearing masks?


14 posted on 12/03/2020 7:17:09 AM PST by Honest Nigerian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Exactly. My daughters father in law runs all the vet stuff at the Elks Club. One of the guys there came down with covid so they all had to get tested since they had a vet dinner to work on. Father in law went to CVS and the test came back positive. He was looking at the paperwork and it stated there was a 50/50 chance the positive outcome was correct. So he went to one of the quick places that charges you $150. Came back negative. Sure made a light bulb go off in his head.
If most of the tests have a 50/50 chance of being correct that would mean up to 50% of the positives are not. Maybe that’s where all those ‘asymptomatic’ cases are coming from. They don’t have it at all.


15 posted on 12/03/2020 7:30:08 AM PST by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sheana
Father in law went to CVS and the test came back positive.

I would ask, what kind of test?

An antibody dipstick test is highly likely to return a false positive, since antibodies are not very specific (i.e. they might be able to detect coronaviruses, but can't tell the difference between different strains of coronaviruses, like common cold vs. Covid-19).

A PCR test is the most accurate, since it specifically detects Covid-19 genetic material. It cannot, however, distinguish between active infection and someone who has recovered but whose body has not cleared out all of the virus material.

A virus culture test would show whether the infection is active, but you still need PCR or sequencing to positively identify the virus.

16 posted on 12/03/2020 7:43:12 AM PST by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

When a person is carrying a communicable disease, they do not have freedom of movement. The health and safety of the people they might expose overrides their freedom to do whatever they want.


17 posted on 12/03/2020 7:46:43 AM PST by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exDemMom

https://www.cvs.com/minuteclinic/covid-19-testing

Looks like it was the free pcr since he waited a few days for the positive result.


18 posted on 12/03/2020 7:47:53 AM PST by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

If they tested positive at the airport where were they supposed to quarantine? In the terminal? Are the airports now conducting their own tests.


19 posted on 12/03/2020 7:52:45 AM PST by surrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Socon-Econ

You’re more than welcome to spend the next two weeks sleeping at the foot of their isolation bed and report back to us.


20 posted on 12/03/2020 7:53:52 AM PST by bgill (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson