They used to call that voting...Until they subverted our sacred privilege of voting. It's impossible to, "Work something out out in a reasonable way", when dealing with unreasonable deceitful people. It's what's on the menu.
The Left thought there was fraud in 2016, the public that is.
Some of the politicians may have as well, but the higher ups
knew it was all a big hoax.
Would it have been helpful for Obama to take actions to have
new repeat elections held?
I ask this, because that’s what we are contemplating here,
based on our understandings.
I think we have more evidence of fraud. The were still
convinced back then.
If we opened up new balloting in certain areas, in 20204
the other side could do it. I’m not convinced that is
we did this it would be helpful.
If a judge is presented evidence of fraud, and he makes a
determination, it gains validity.
Voting again, does not have that same validity. It looks
like voting until we like the results.
There is a lot of talk out there, but we are not locking
down real evidence so far. That’s the same position the
Left was in back in 2016.
I had hoped we would have the big mo by now. Instead it’s
looking scattered.
I still believe there was rampant criminality, but we have
to prove it.
I am still hopeful that will be presented, and judges will
side with us.