Dominion contractor drops bombshell at Michigan hearing

wnd ^ | 12/1/20 | wnd staff

[sappy]

this is already more evidence than existed for the phony impeachment attempt by Dems.

[MCSETots]

Yeah, but that’s not “enough proof” . . . .

[ClearCase_guy]

Yeah, but … “no evidence”.

[spokeshave]

Saw it...amazing testimony....that lady has stones of steel and a backbone to match.

[ArtDodger]

Yeah, but...
Where is your evidence?:/

[brownsfan]

*** Yeah, but that’s not “enough proof” . . . . ***

Said Barr, as he went back to blowing his pipes.

[spokeshave]

Here it is...Melissa Chrone

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uOwbJqPlXHI&feature=youtu.be

[Fresh Wind]

Quoth Twitter:

“This claim about election fraud is disputed.”

[Blurb2350]

I remember reading of this same allegation several weeks ago. Poll workers were seen sending stacks of 50 ballots (evidently the max that can be put in the counter’s hopper) thru four and five times. This election fraud happened on multiple levels. The rigging of the voting machines and production and distribution of phony ballots was clearly organized from the top. But there was also a huge amount of the Democrats’ customary ad hoc cheating at the local level — changing individual ballots, destroying or discarding ballots, submitting stolen or bogus ballots. We haven’t had “free and fair” elections for many, many years, if ever.

[DIRTYSECRET]

You’re missing something. Inner city. It was all done by blacks. They’re the ones who are easily led and will follow unapologetically. Unashamed. So why does tis remind me of the O.J. verdict?

[1Old Pro]

"I watched this with my own eyes," Carone said.

We need ten more people to say they were with you, otherwise we can't use first hand eyewitness testimony. /s

[cuban leaf]

This is the funny thing about evidence. People think it is synonymous with “proof”. Testimony is evidence. In fact, even false testimony is evidence.

So the idea that anyone would say there is no evidence of fraud is simply either ignorant of the meaning of the word or a liar. There are mountains of evidence.

[Red Badger]

[cuban leaf]

“Proof” is determined in a court of law. Evidence is used to determine if it should go to a court of law. There are mountains of evidence. Some of it may, possibly, turn out to be false evidence, but that is for a court of law to determine.

[central_va]

Ultimately, in this specific situation, the state legislatures can do pretty much anything the want to to remedy the “situation”. If you don’t agree with me then i will refer yo to Art. II of the USC. Thanks.

[hapnHal]

Arrest the election workers. Let them go to court. See if they admit if the stuffed ballots. Jail time coming?

[nikos1121]

Seems like this would be easy to prove.

[RBW in PA]

Someone with a large public following needs to make a collage of all this testimony and place it on their site. The video should be short clips, non-stop of all the various claims. It could also be a mosaic of different people making similar statements. Very similar to what has already been done showing the media regurgitating the same talking points.

I could do this, but have no outlet for viewers.

[rktman]

WOW! Who did her hair up like that?