Posted on 11/25/2020 11:45:49 PM PST by kiryandil
As of June 29, 2020:
# Title Judge Duty on Born Term of service Appointed by 49 Chief Judge Denise Page Hood Detroit 1952 1994–present 2015–present Clinton 50 District Judge Paul D. Borman Detroit 1939 1994–present — — Clinton 54 District Judge Victoria A. Roberts Detroit 1951 1998–present — — Clinton 56 District Judge David M. Lawson Detroit 1951 2000–present — — Clinton 57 District Judge Sean Cox Detroit 1957 2006–present — — G.W. Bush 58 District Judge Thomas Lamson Ludington Bay City 1953 2006–present — — G.W. Bush 59 District Judge Stephen Murphy III Detroit 1962 2008–present — — G.W. Bush 60 District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith Detroit 1952 2010–present — — Obama 61 District Judge Gershwin A. Drain Detroit 1949 2012–present — — Obama 62 District Judge Terrence G. Berg Detroit 1959 2012–present — — Obama 63 District Judge Matthew F Leitman Flint 1968 2014–present — — Obama 64 District Judge Judith Ellen Levy Ann Arbor 1958 2014–present — — Obama 65 District Judge Laurie J. Michelson Detroit 1967 2014–present — — Obama 66 District Judge Linda Vivienne Parker Detroit 1958 2014–present — — Obama 67 District Judge Stephanie D. Davis Flint 1967 2019–present — — Trump
# Title Judge Duty station Born Term of service Appointed by 49 Chief Judge Denise Page Hood Detroit 1952 1994–present 2015–present Clinton 50 District Judge Paul D. Borman Detroit 1939 1994–present — — Clinton 54 District Judge Victoria A. Roberts Detroit 1951 1998–present — — Clinton 56 District Judge David M. Lawson Detroit 1951 2000–present — — Clinton 57 District Judge Sean Cox Detroit 1957 2006–present — — G.W. Bush 58 District Judge Thomas Lamson Ludington Bay City 1953 2006–present — — G.W. Bush 59 District Judge Stephen Murphy III Detroit 1962 2008–present — — G.W. Bush 60 District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith Detroit 1952 2010–present — — Obama 61 District Judge Gershwin A. Drain Detroit 1949 2012–present — — Obama 62 District Judge Terrence G. Berg Detroit 1959 2012–present — — Obama 63 District Judge Matthew F Leitman Flint 1968 2014–present — — Obama 64 District Judge Judith Ellen Levy Ann Arbor 1958 2014–present — — Obama 65 District Judge Laurie J. Michelson Detroit 1967 2014–present — — Obama 66 District Judge Linda Vivienne Parker Detroit 1958 2014–present — — Obama 67 District Judge Stephanie D. Davis Flint 1967 2019–present — — Trump
JUDGE | COMMISSION DATE | BY |
Chief Judge R. Guy Cole, Jr. | 26-Dec-95 | Clinton |
Judge Karen Nelson Moore | 24-Mar-95 | Clinton |
Judge Eric L. Clay | 1-Aug-97 | Clinton |
Judge Julia Smith Gibbons | 2-Aug-02 | Bush 43 |
Judge Jeffrey S. Sutton | 5-May-03 | Bush 43 |
Judge Richard Allen Griffin | 10-Jun-05 | Bush 43 |
Judge Raymond M. Kethledge | 7-Jul-08 | Bush 43 |
Judge Helene N. White | 8-Aug-08 | Bush 43 |
Judge Jane Branstetter Stranch | 15-Sep-10 | Obama |
Judge Bernice B. Donald | 8-Sep-11 | Obama |
Judge Amul R. Thapar | 25-May-17 | Trump |
Judge John K. Bush | 21-Jul-17 | Trump |
Judge Joan L. Larsen | 2-Nov-17 | Trump |
Judge John B. Nalbandian | 17-May-18 | Trump |
Judge Chad A. Readler | 7-Mar-19 | Trump |
Judge Eric E. Murphy | 11-Mar-19 | Trump |
Senior Judge Gilbert S. Merritt | 31-Oct-77 | Carter |
Senior Judge Ralph B. Guy, Jr. | 17-Oct-85 | Reagan |
Senior Judge Danny J. Boggs | 25-Mar-86 | Reagan |
Senior Judge Alan E. Norris | 1-Jul-86 | Reagan |
Senior Judge Richard F. Suhrheinrich | 10-Jul-90 | Bush 41 |
Senior Judge Eugene E. Siler, Jr. | 16-Sep-91 | Bush 41 |
Senior Judge Alice M. Batchelder | 2-Dec-91 | Bush 41 |
Senior Judge Martha Craig Daughtrey | 22-Nov-93 | Clinton |
Senior Judge Ronald Lee Gilman | 7-Nov-97 | Clinton |
Senior Judge John M. Rogers | 26-Nov-02 | Bush 43 |
Senior Judge Deborah L. Cook | 7-May-03 | Bush 43 |
Senior Judge David W. McKeague | 10-Jun-05 | Bush 43 |
There are many angles which could be focussed on here. However, I will focus on the obvious, intentional, left wing socialist DNC time angle strategy.
Just like Florida (Bush V Gore), this whole strategically planned national scale election fraud disaster, will most likely have to be fought far beyond any level of Michigan court, and likely beyond the legislature. Or when the time ces, may necessarily include a coordinated state legislature/US Congress effort.
Certainly hoping otherwise, but it is unlikely the state legislature will have anywhere near the time, character, and bravery, to stand for the greater than majority number of voters, who through left wing socialist DNC thuggery, have been robbed.
The only places left after “state anything”, are likely to be SCOTUS, and or US Congress. I am ultimately not going to trust any federal appeals court yet.
For a court with any character, there are a few theoretically good legal approaches available. However, don’t hold your breath, and be ready in the event SCOTUS kicks it all to US Congress, which then again kicks it all back to state legislatures.
One of the biggest problems is scale. The Demonic Uniparty realized by experience, a single DNC planned fraudulent state ballot robbery (like Florida in Bush V. Gore), could be handled by top seasoned lawyers, and focused volunteer manpower.
However, they obviously have long realized Constitutionally set deadlines could be key to force fraudulent election “certification”, and the election timetables could be used in conjunction with a national scale strategic fraud campaign, with myriad types of overt “in-your-face” ballot insertions, (digital and physical), which could easily break the backs of even highly capable legal teams and volunteers. The strategy required scale of fraud, and time limits.
And goes without saying, the national scale of felonious criminal election activity, and the necessary time for investigations, charges, lawsuits, etc, etc, could really only be dealt with post inauguration.
This is pure lawfare strategy, now applied to destroy the US election system.
We are dealing with very real evil here.
“This is pure lawfare strategy “
Maybe.
* Trump does not concede.
* Trump has the Armed Forces.
* We have the numbers
In the Middle Ages, there was often two or even three contending prelates, all claiming to be the pope. All their claims were fraudulent. This gave rise to the term “anti-pope”.
Do we now have an anti-President?
All these suits will end up at the Supremes.
Yup. And the scotus cares not what the media thinks or about polls, tweets.
They will follow the law. Take note of case law in all of Sidneys filings. We will hear those names again.
There is a country full of left wing activists that have no clue that not only will Biden be denied the WH, but that the cherished vote fraud machine of the DNC is dead forever more. Scotus will make sure to send a message about election fraud so that this vile scourge is removed from the nation.
Not sure Trump has “the armed forces.” The top Pentagon leadership is still extremely Swampy. Kelly, Mullin, Mattis, McInerny, others who left are terrible-—but how many haven’t left?
Newsmax poll, not sure how accurate, said 2/3 polled think the President should pursue his fraud investigation.
Most of these suits have been tossed out. But it only takes one to make it to the Supreme Court. Assuming the decision goes the right way.
The military will follow the Constitution. As long as Trump has that on his side then they will be behind him. If he, or anyone else, tries something outside of the Constitution then they will be in opposition.
Yes and the Insurrection act is a totally legal avenue for Trump to follow if he has proof of foreign national in a national election. Or treasonous activity such as an overthrow not our election system. There’s a reason the spec ops got reassigned to DOD Miller.
LOL! Not really, no.
There’s a reason the spec ops got reassigned to DOD Miller.
The military's loyalty is to the Constitution. So long as Trump is acting within the Constitution then the military will obey him. Step out of line and they won't.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.