Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
United States District Court -- Eastern Michigan District ^ | November 26, 2020 | United States District Court -- Eastern Michigan District

Posted on 11/25/2020 11:45:49 PM PST by kiryandil

As of June 29, 2020:

#	Title	Judge	                        Duty on	Born	Term of service	Appointed by
49	Chief Judge	Denise Page Hood	Detroit	 
        1952	1994–present	2015–present	Clinton
50	District Judge	Paul D. Borman	        Detroit	1939	1994–present	—	—	Clinton
54	District Judge	Victoria A. Roberts	Detroit	 
        1951	1998–present	—	—	Clinton
56	District Judge	David M. Lawson	        Detroit	1951	2000–present	—	—	Clinton
57	District Judge	Sean Cox	        Detroit	 
        1957	2006–present	—	—	G.W. Bush
58	District Judge	Thomas Lamson Ludington	Bay City	 
        1953	2006–present	—	—	G.W. Bush
59	District Judge	Stephen Murphy III	Detroit	 
        1962	2008–present	—	—	G.W. Bush
60	District Judge	Mark A. Goldsmith	Detroit	 
        1952	2010–present	—	—	Obama
61	District Judge	Gershwin A. Drain	Detroit	 
        1949	2012–present	—	—	Obama
62	District Judge	Terrence G. Berg	Detroit	 
        1959	2012–present	—	—	Obama
63	District Judge	Matthew F Leitman	Flint	 
        1968	2014–present	—	—	Obama
64	District Judge	Judith Ellen Levy	Ann Arbor	1958	2014–present	—	—	Obama
65	District Judge	Laurie J. Michelson	Detroit	1967	2014–present	—	—	Obama
66	District Judge	Linda Vivienne Parker	Detroit	1958	2014–present	—	—	Obama
67	District Judge	Stephanie D. Davis	Flint	1967	2019–present	—	—	Trump


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: dirtywhitmer

1 posted on 11/25/2020 11:45:49 PM PST by kiryandil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kiryandil
As of June 29, 2020:
#	Title	Judge	                        Duty station	Born	Term of service	                Appointed by
49	Chief Judge	Denise Page Hood	Detroit	        1952	1994–present	2015–present	Clinton
50	District Judge	Paul D. Borman	        Detroit	        1939	1994–present	—	—	Clinton
54	District Judge	Victoria A. Roberts	Detroit	        1951	1998–present	—	—	Clinton
56	District Judge	David M. Lawson	        Detroit	        1951	2000–present	—	—	Clinton
57	District Judge	Sean Cox	        Detroit	        1957	2006–present	—	—	G.W. Bush
58	District Judge	Thomas Lamson Ludington	Bay City	1953	2006–present	—	—	G.W. Bush
59	District Judge	Stephen Murphy III	Detroit	        1962	2008–present	—	—	G.W. Bush
60	District Judge	Mark A. Goldsmith	Detroit	        1952	2010–present	—	—	Obama
61	District Judge	Gershwin A. Drain	Detroit	        1949	2012–present	—	—	Obama
62	District Judge	Terrence G. Berg	Detroit	        1959	2012–present	—	—	Obama
63	District Judge	Matthew F Leitman	Flint	        1968	2014–present	—	—	Obama
64	District Judge	Judith Ellen Levy	Ann Arbor	1958	2014–present	—	—	Obama
65	District Judge	Laurie J. Michelson	Detroit	        1967	2014–present	—	—	Obama
66	District Judge	Linda Vivienne Parker	Detroit	        1958	2014–present	—	—	Obama
67	District Judge	Stephanie D. Davis	Flint	        1967	2019–present	—	—	Trump

2 posted on 11/26/2020 12:12:06 AM PST by kiryandil (Chris Wallace: Because someone has to drive the Clown Car)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil
SIXTH DISTRICT
JUDGE COMMISSION DATE BY
Chief Judge R. Guy Cole, Jr. 26-Dec-95 Clinton
Judge Karen Nelson Moore 24-Mar-95 Clinton
Judge Eric L. Clay 1-Aug-97 Clinton
Judge Julia Smith Gibbons 2-Aug-02 Bush 43
Judge Jeffrey S. Sutton 5-May-03 Bush 43
Judge Richard Allen Griffin 10-Jun-05 Bush 43
Judge Raymond M. Kethledge 7-Jul-08 Bush 43
Judge Helene N. White 8-Aug-08 Bush 43
Judge Jane Branstetter Stranch 15-Sep-10 Obama
Judge Bernice B. Donald 8-Sep-11 Obama
Judge Amul R. Thapar 25-May-17 Trump
Judge John K. Bush 21-Jul-17 Trump
Judge Joan L. Larsen 2-Nov-17 Trump
Judge John B. Nalbandian 17-May-18 Trump
Judge Chad A. Readler 7-Mar-19 Trump
Judge Eric E. Murphy 11-Mar-19 Trump
Senior Judge Gilbert S. Merritt 31-Oct-77 Carter
Senior Judge Ralph B. Guy, Jr. 17-Oct-85 Reagan
Senior Judge Danny J. Boggs 25-Mar-86 Reagan
Senior Judge Alan E. Norris 1-Jul-86 Reagan
Senior Judge Richard F. Suhrheinrich 10-Jul-90 Bush 41
Senior Judge Eugene E. Siler, Jr. 16-Sep-91 Bush 41
Senior Judge Alice M. Batchelder 2-Dec-91 Bush 41
Senior Judge Martha Craig Daughtrey 22-Nov-93 Clinton
Senior Judge Ronald Lee Gilman 7-Nov-97 Clinton
Senior Judge John M. Rogers 26-Nov-02 Bush 43
Senior Judge Deborah L. Cook 7-May-03 Bush 43
Senior Judge David W. McKeague 10-Jun-05 Bush 43

3 posted on 11/26/2020 12:20:36 AM PST by BigEdLB (All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others-George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil; All

There are many angles which could be focussed on here. However, I will focus on the obvious, intentional, left wing socialist DNC time angle strategy.

Just like Florida (Bush V Gore), this whole strategically planned national scale election fraud disaster, will most likely have to be fought far beyond any level of Michigan court, and likely beyond the legislature. Or when the time ces, may necessarily include a coordinated state legislature/US Congress effort.

Certainly hoping otherwise, but it is unlikely the state legislature will have anywhere near the time, character, and bravery, to stand for the greater than majority number of voters, who through left wing socialist DNC thuggery, have been robbed.

The only places left after “state anything”, are likely to be SCOTUS, and or US Congress. I am ultimately not going to trust any federal appeals court yet.

For a court with any character, there are a few theoretically good legal approaches available. However, don’t hold your breath, and be ready in the event SCOTUS kicks it all to US Congress, which then again kicks it all back to state legislatures.

One of the biggest problems is scale. The Demonic Uniparty realized by experience, a single DNC planned fraudulent state ballot robbery (like Florida in Bush V. Gore), could be handled by top seasoned lawyers, and focused volunteer manpower.

However, they obviously have long realized Constitutionally set deadlines could be key to force fraudulent election “certification”, and the election timetables could be used in conjunction with a national scale strategic fraud campaign, with myriad types of overt “in-your-face” ballot insertions, (digital and physical), which could easily break the backs of even highly capable legal teams and volunteers. The strategy required scale of fraud, and time limits.

And goes without saying, the national scale of felonious criminal election activity, and the necessary time for investigations, charges, lawsuits, etc, etc, could really only be dealt with post inauguration.

This is pure lawfare strategy, now applied to destroy the US election system.

We are dealing with very real evil here.


4 posted on 11/26/2020 12:46:26 AM PST by patriotfury ((May the fleas of a thousand camels occupy mo' ham mads tents!) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriotfury

“This is pure lawfare strategy “

Maybe.
* Trump does not concede.
* Trump has the Armed Forces.
* We have the numbers


5 posted on 11/26/2020 12:53:28 AM PST by Varsity Flight (QE 2020. All Quiet on the Western Front)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Varsity Flight

In the Middle Ages, there was often two or even three contending prelates, all claiming to be the pope. All their claims were fraudulent. This gave rise to the term “anti-pope”.

Do we now have an anti-President?


6 posted on 11/26/2020 1:11:21 AM PST by NTHockey (My rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners. And to the NSA trolls, FU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: patriotfury

All these suits will end up at the Supremes.


7 posted on 11/26/2020 6:46:14 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

Yup. And the scotus cares not what the media thinks or about polls, tweets.

They will follow the law. Take note of case law in all of Sidneys filings. We will hear those names again.

There is a country full of left wing activists that have no clue that not only will Biden be denied the WH, but that the cherished vote fraud machine of the DNC is dead forever more. Scotus will make sure to send a message about election fraud so that this vile scourge is removed from the nation.


8 posted on 11/26/2020 6:51:45 AM PST by Professional ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Varsity Flight

Not sure Trump has “the armed forces.” The top Pentagon leadership is still extremely Swampy. Kelly, Mullin, Mattis, McInerny, others who left are terrible-—but how many haven’t left?


9 posted on 11/26/2020 6:56:40 AM PST by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually" (Hendrix) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LS

Newsmax poll, not sure how accurate, said 2/3 polled think the President should pursue his fraud investigation.


10 posted on 11/26/2020 2:42:23 PM PST by SecAmndmt (Arm yourselves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2
All these suits will end up at the Supremes.

Most of these suits have been tossed out. But it only takes one to make it to the Supreme Court. Assuming the decision goes the right way.

11 posted on 11/26/2020 2:48:45 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LS
Not sure Trump has “the armed forces.” The top Pentagon leadership is still extremely Swampy.

The military will follow the Constitution. As long as Trump has that on his side then they will be behind him. If he, or anyone else, tries something outside of the Constitution then they will be in opposition.

12 posted on 11/26/2020 2:50:49 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Yes and the Insurrection act is a totally legal avenue for Trump to follow if he has proof of foreign national in a national election. Or treasonous activity such as an overthrow not our election system. There’s a reason the spec ops got reassigned to DOD Miller.


13 posted on 11/26/2020 5:06:48 PM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2
Yes and the Insurrection act is a totally legal avenue for Trump to follow if he has proof of foreign national in a national election. Or treasonous activity such as an overthrow not our election system.

LOL! Not really, no.

There’s a reason the spec ops got reassigned to DOD Miller.

The military's loyalty is to the Constitution. So long as Trump is acting within the Constitution then the military will obey him. Step out of line and they won't.

14 posted on 11/26/2020 6:11:06 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson