KRAKEN RELEASED! Attorney Sidney Powell Files 104 Page Complaint of Massive Fraud in Georgia Election

This civil action brings to light a massive election fraud, multiple violations of Georgia laws, including O.C.G.A. §§ 21-2-30(d), 21-2-31, 21-2- 33.1 and §21-2-522, and multiple Constitutional violations, as shown by fact witnesses to specific incidents, multiple expert witnesses and the sheer mathematical impossibilities found in the Georgia 2020 General Election.

As a civil action, the plaintiff’s burden of proof is a “preponderance of the evidence” to show, as the Georgia Supreme Court has made clear that, “[i] was not incumbent upon [Plaintiff] to show how the [] voters would have voted if their [absentee] ballots had been regular. [Plaintiff] only had to show that there were enough irregular ballots to place in doubt the result.” Mead v. Sheffield, 278 Ga. 268, 272, 601 S.E.2d 99, 102 (2004) (citing Howell v. Fears, 275 Ga. 627, 571 S.E.2d 392 (2002).

The same pattern of election fraud and voter fraud writ large occurred in all the swing states with only minor variations, see expert reports, regarding Michigan, Pennsylvania, Arizona and Wisconsin. (See William M. Briggs Decl., attached here to as Exh. 1, Report with Attachment). Indeed, we believe that in Arizona at least 35,000 votes were illegally added to Mr. Biden’s vote count.

The scheme and artifice to defraud was for the purpose of illegally and fraudulently manipulating the vote count to make certain the election of Joe Biden as President of the United States. 3. The fraud was executed by many means,2 but the most fundamentally troubling, insidious, and egregious is the systemic adaptation of old-fashioned “ballot-stuffing.” It has now been amplified and rendered virtually invisible by computer software created and run by domestic and foreign actors for that very purpose. Mathematical and statistical anomalies rising to the level of impossibilities, as shown by affidavits of multiple witnesses, documentation, and expert testimony evince this scheme across the state of Georgia. Especially egregious conduct arose in Forsyth, Paulding, Cherokee, Hall, and Barrow County. This scheme and artifice to defraud affected tens of thousands of votes in Georgia alone and “rigged” the election in Georgia for Joe Biden.

Here is my summary of the counts in Sidney's Georgia filing, I may have missed some. Especially count 5 where I stopped after a lot seemed repetitive. I also did not try to capture all of the estimated counts in the filing. The request for relief at the end was not summarized and posted verbatum.

Count 1 Defendents violated the Elections Clause and 42 U.S.C Rule changes and cure procedures conflict with state legislation.
This count includes

workers not following procedures when counting,
mail-in ballots sent to people who had not requested them,
votes from people who had moved out of state

Count 2 Denial of Equal Protection. Secretary of State and Georgia counties violated the 14th Amendment, 42 U.S.C. § 1983
This count includes

Opening ballots prior to election day in violation of legislative statute,
improper procedures with lack of auditable logs,
a large number of identical pristine ballots that were likely fraudulent,
breach of chain of custody of voting machines the night before the election,
failure to treat voters in all counties the same,
the banning of observers,
not allowing observers to review all envelopes,
use of Dominion Democracy Suite software,
workers switching votes from Trump to Biden,
allowing ineligible ballots to be counted,
use of Dominion software which allowed eligible ballots to be switched between candidates or lost altogether.

Count 3 Denial of Due Process 14th Amendment § 1983 Disparate treatment of Absentee/Mail-In Voters among different counties.
subjecting one class of voters to greater burdens or scrutiny than another.

Count 4 Denial of Due Process on the Right to Vote 14th Amendment Art 1 § 4, CL. 1; Art II § 1, Cl.2; Amend 16 U.S.C. § 1983.
This count includes all previous allegations,

failure to count legal votes,
failure to count votes free from distortion by illegal votes,
failure to verify signatures,
abnormally low signature rejection rate compared to states which have had mail-in voting for years.

Count 5 There was Wide-Spread Ballot Fraud OCGA 21-2-522
This count includes all previous paragraphs.

Enough irregular ballots exist to put the election in doubt.
Glitches in the Dominion system have uniform effect of hurting Trump and helping Biden.
Fraudulent acts show votes being switched from Trump to Biden during the recount,
lack of procedures to follow the election code,
use of Dominion despite evidence of serious vulnerabilities,
misrepresentations about a pipe burst that sent everyone home,
while some poll workers remained and kept working on the machines,
failure to maintain logs on the voting system for a genuine and sound audit,
ballots received that were never requested,
third parties voted an untold number of unlawfully acquired absentee or mail-in ballots,
20,311 voters had registered as having moved out of state,
at least 96,600 mail-in ballots were fraudulently cast,
136,098 ballots were illegally counted as a result of improper manipulation of the Dominion software,
mail in ballots were requested by 3rd parties or sent erroneously to persons and voted fraudulently,
undetected by a failed system of signature verification

For these reasons, Plaintiff asks this Court to enter a judgment in their favor and provide the following emergency relief:

1. An order directing Governor Kemp, Secretary Raffensperger and the Georgia State Board of Elections to de-certify the election results;
2. An order enjoining Governor Kemp from transmitting the currently certified election results to the Electoral College;
3. An order requiring Governor Kemp to transmit certified election results that state that President Donald Trump is the winner of the election; 101
4. An immediate order to impound all the voting machines and software in Georgia for expert inspection by the Plaintiffs.
5. An order that no votes received or tabulated by machines that were not certified as required by federal and state law be counted.
6. A declaratory judgment declaring that Georgia Secretary of State Rule 183-1-14-0.9-.15 violates the Electors and Elections Clause, U.S. CONST. art. I, § 4;
7. A declaratory judgment declaring that Georgia’s failed system of signature verification violates the Electors and Elections Clause by working a de facto abolition of the signature verification requirement;
8. A declaratory judgment declaring that current certified election results violates the Due Process Clause, U.S. CONST. Amend. XIV;
9. A declaratory judgment declaring that mail-in and absentee ballot fraud must be remedied with a Full Manual Recount or statistically valid sampling that properly verifies the signatures on absentee ballot envelopes and that invalidates the certified results if the recount or sampling analysis shows a sufficient number of ineligible absentee ballots were counted; 102
10. An emergency declaratory judgment that voting machines be Seized and Impounded immediately for a forensic audit—by plaintiffs’ expects;
11. A declaratory judgment declaring absentee ballot fraud occurred in violation of Constitutional rights, Election laws and under state law;
12. A permanent injunction prohibiting the Governor and Secretary of State from transmitting the currently certified results to the Electoral College based on the overwhelming evidence of election tampering;
13. Immediate production of 36 hours of security camera recording of all rooms used in the voting process at State Farm Arena in Fulton County, GA from 12:00am to 3:00am until 6:00pm on November 3.
14. Plaintiffs further request the Court grant such other relief as is just and proper, including but not limited to, the costs of this action and their reasonable attorney fees and expenses pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1988.

So you’re saying this is a perfect legal document??? Did you even read it? If so, do you have eyes or understand what logical argument looks like? If so, defend my critique with something other than ad hominens.

You must be new around here.

I'll reply sequentially to each of your questions.

So you’re saying this is a perfect legal document???

The standard in this case is (since this is a civil case) preponderance of the evidence. That means 51%-49% wins.

As Powell and/or Lin stated about these cases, most people incarcerated in the United States, were convicted on less evidence than this.

The perfect is the enemy of the good.

Did you even read it?

I *posted* the first excerpts on FR on both cases last night (I stayed up until 3AM local time). I read both cases. I've also been posting links to the attached exhibits.

Don’t be an idiot and remain blind to errors our side commits.

You're the idiot as evidenced by your reaction.

The so-called errors are merely cosmetic. The substance contained in these filings -- that is, the substantive evidence of the crimes committed -- is enough to make Watergate look like a three-year-old wetting the bed.

What part of 13 unencrypted Dominion Passwords visible and Chinese and Iranian access to OUR voting systems don't you comprehend?

Makes you, us, and our cause look ignorant and insincere.

You sound like a panicked teenager from Mom's basement when he finds out that the girls in their underwear he's been talking to on the $3.99/minute phone line aren't *really* in love with him after all.

I love Sidney, love Trump, know there was fraud, know the facts are on our side; that the execution of our case came to this should upset everyone.

(Shaking my head in disbelief.) Not even you can really be this stupid. The examples chosen and the case-law cited have been hand-crafted and cherry-picked for a 9-0 Supreme Court decision in Donald Trump's favor. If my handle had been anything else what would your criticism of my synopsis have been?

I would probably have gotten a 72-hour time out for my invective.

Ageist, much??

No -- you're the one who used a self-deprecating handle (and not necessarily humorously or ironically either, because WAY too many millenials and younger have been taught to loathe the United States, the West, and Christianity). In the spirit of Ronald Reagan's great quip about Mondale, "I refuse to use my opponent's youth and inexperience against him" I only answered you in a considered fashion instead of reaching for my Flammenwerfer becasue you are a young and clueless n00b.

Here's a hint: The enemy had software which was literally designed and written to specifications by a Communist dictator. It was designed to change votes WITHOUT leaving an audit trail. Not only did the Dems have this, but they had both the MSM and social media actively promoting lies about the President and suppressing good news about him; while covering up serious scandals for Biden/Heels-Up. Despite this, Trump won in such a historic landslide that the enemy had to become blatant and obvious in their cheating, because the legit votes for Donald Trump were outside the design parameters for their vote-stealing software.

Why don't you take into account

a) how sloppy the enemy's ACTUAL EXECUTION was

b) The fact that Powell and team had to go from a standing start a few days after the election, AND go upstream against opposition/participation in the fraud/sabotage by many members of the GOP who were specifically located in sensitive positions with respect to preventing / finding fraud (recall that Rancid Penis assured President Trump at bedtime on election night that Wisconsin "was in the bag" and look at the Georga Governor and Secretary of State)
AND they were in a tremendous hurry. To hear of, sort through, contact, verify, obtain depositions from, collate, write, and merge with the proper legal precedents, 85 pages for Michigan, and 104 pages for Georgia, under these circumstances (while still representing Flynn AND appear on talk shows to rally public support) is nothing short of a miracle.

Here's another clue:

A brief synopsis which is easily digestible by bored Twitter-surfers who demand novel intellectual "stimulation" be delivered to them on demand 24x7 with zero effort expended other than wriggling their thumbs, is ABSOLUTELY unsuited for a Federal Court. There are both informal conventions in diction, as well as specific legal forms which have to be adhered to; in addition to the "admissibility" and the form and structure both of the brief and the supporting evidence.

But you can do better from Mommy's basement, because just ask you.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.