Posted on 11/25/2020 9:12:08 PM PST by raynman33
ping to the NeverTrump contingent...
Yeah the least they could have done is a spell check at the very end.
#ReFreeQ!
watermark talk on page 35
They know who voted for who after the election. not good!!!
I imagine this may indicate Hugo Chavez wanted to know the identity of the people voting against him. *shudder*
I’m shocked, I tell you.....shocked!
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3909553/posts?page=649#649
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3909553/posts?page=650#650
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3909553/posts?page=653#653
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3909553/posts?page=655#655
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3909553/posts?page=658#658
Watermark of ballots?
yes
Another Affiant testified about the use of different paper for ballots, that would constitute fraud stating:
“I noticed that almost all of the ballots I reviewed were for Biden. Many batches went 100% for Biden. I also observed that the watermark on at least 3 ballots were solid gray instead of transparent, leading me to believe the ballot was counterfeit.”
88.
Another Affiant testified about the use of different paper for ballots,
that would constitute fraud stating:
I noticed that almost all of the ballots I reviewed were for Biden. Many batches went 100% for Biden. I also observed that the watermark on at least 3 ballots were solid gray instead of transparent, leading me to believe the ballot was counterfeit. I challenged this and the Elections Director said it was a legitimate ballot and was due to the use of different printers. Many ballots had markings for Biden only, and no markings on the rest of the ballot.
(See Attached hereto, Exh. 20, Aff of Debra J. Fisher, at pars. 4, 5, 6).
that is the piece that can make a difference and what I have been looking for.
Will the word of someone be enough? Probably not. BUt I have to assume the word of that someone can also tell how the deed can be traced.
Enter Ezra.
This has potential.
I am looking forward to how the Gang of 8 freaks out and how everyone tries to shut it down on National Security concerns
Btw, any possibibility that it is FLynn. Was he ever in the 305?
Someone stated today, and perhaps many times before today,
that the Dominion system can only process so many records
in a certain time frame, and that records showed more votes
were processed than was physically possible. That would
seem like a very good point to make where it can be found
to be true.
Age Title Judge Duty station Born Term of service Chief Appointed by 69 Chief Judge Thomas W. Thrash Jr. Atlanta 1951 1997–present 2014–present Clinton 60 District Judge Timothy C. Batten Sr. Newnan 1960 2006–present — — G.W. Bush 70 District Judge Amy Totenberg Atlanta 1950 2011–present — — Obama 63 District Judge Steve C. Jones Atlanta 1957 2011–present — — Obama 49 District Judge Leigh Martin May Atlanta 1971 2014–present — — Obama 65 District Judge Mark Howard Cohen Atlanta 1955 2014–present — — Obama 53 District Judge Eleanor Louise Ross Atlanta 1967 2014–present — — Obama 54 District Judge Michael Lawrence Brown Atlanta 1968 2018–present — — Trump 57 District Judge William McCrary Ray II Atlanta 1963 2018–present — — Trump 49 District Judge J. P. Boulee Atlanta 1971 2019–present — — Trump 46 District Judge Steven D. Grimberg Atlanta 1974 2019–present — — Trump
Counterfeiting, not voter tracking.
I read that part as a way to link a fingerprint to the voters ORIGINAL vote and display how they voted, but that it would be different than the way that vote was added to the final tabulation. It stored and displayed the original vote but counted it the modified way. Clever.
This is my favorite part:
“3. An order requiring Governor Kemp to transmit certified election results that state that President Donald Trump is the winner of the election”
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3909553/posts?page=662#662
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3909553/posts?page=666#666
request for relief at the end:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3909553/posts?page=667#667
Freeper grey-whiskers is a Patriot!
Here’s one of the charges that could stick...
“Expert analysis of the actual vote set forth below demonstrates that at least 96,600 votes were illegally counted during the Georgia 2020 general election. All of the evidence and allegation herein is more than sufficient to place the result of the election in doubt. More evidence arrives by the day and discovery should be ordered immediately.
“Georgia law, (OCGA 21-5-552) provides for a contest of an election where: (1) Misconduct, fraud, or irregularity by any primary or election official or officials sufficient to change or place in doubt the result; . . . (3) When illegal votes have been received or legal votes rejected at the polls sufficient to change or place in doubt the result; (4) For any error in counting the votes or declaring the result of the primary or election, if such error would change the result; or (5) For any other cause which shows that another was the person legally nominated, elected, or eligible to compete in a run-off primary or election.”
As further set forth below, all of the above grounds have been satisfied and compel this Court to set aside the 2020 General Election results which fraudulently concluded that Mr. Biden defeated President Trump by 12,670 votes.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.