I Know Sidney Powell. She Is Telling the Truth

The Stream ^ | 11/19/2020 | John Zmirak

[linMcHlp]

bttt

[doc maverick]

And the false narrative is?

[TeddyRay]

Licensed to Lie is unreal. My 93 year old father just read it and blew his mind.

[RckyRaCoCo]

Remember, she used the word...Biblical.

Only she knows in what context she actually meant for it to be used.

We're are dealing with some of the worst rot of humanity in our time, just a matter of time before things reach a tipping point.

Good vs. Evil.

[RummyChick]

btw, on the flip side of it..there is probably some weirdness to due L Lin Wood and Powell...given Barnes was involved with Covington issue

But you can’t deny Barnes has better credentials when it comes to election law and arguing before SCOTUS

[ocrp1982]

“He has argued an election case before SCOTUS.”
Many lawyers have argued before the SC. Many have lost. Be that as it may. Are you suggesting that Sydney Powell and Lin Wood should just give up the fight for justice and against massive voter fraud simply because of this guy’s opinion?

[RummyChick]

No, I am not suggesting that.

You asked for his credentials.
I gave them to you.

[RummyChick]

oh, before you claim he lost..you might want to read what happened

[madison10]

Agree.

[SaveFerris]

Excellent idea

[Phillyred]

Thanks for reminding me to pray for her just did. Amen

[Jamestown1630]

It doesn't matter if you've done it before, or not.

One of the greatest mind-control fallacies that humanity has ever bought-into is that something that has never been done before can't be done at all.

"The law of floatation was not discovered by contemplating the sinking of things, but by contemplating the floating of things which floated naturally, and then intelligently asking why they did so."

- Thomas Troward

[RummyChick]

OR>..maybe I am talking out my ass on this because I am tired....it ran UP to SCOTUS...he won. SCOTUS declined to hear it.

[RummyChick]

No, it doesnt matter if you have done it before

Everyone has a first time.

Not many lawyers argue before SCOTUS..and a lot dream about it.

[Jamestown1630]

Go to bed, Rummy.

[kara37]

Going to defer to Robert Barnes take on Powell.

***********************************

I read Robert Barnes too. However, I noticed that there hasn’t been one lawyer he hasn’t criticized, including ACB.

[ocrp1982]

“oh, before you claim he lost..you might want to read what happened”
I said many who appear before the SC lose. I did peruse the article at the link btw.
The evidence of voter fraud that Powell and Wood have accumulated is massive. They have direct testimony of hundreds of people who are direct witnesses and mathematical/statistical analysis that is devastating from credentialed mathematicians and statisticians.
As Powell has stated, there are many many thousands of people serving hard time on evidence far less than what she has accumulated.

[Jamestown1630]

I don’t think Sidney Powell is someone who has wasted much time on ‘dreaming’ about anything.

she’s always been Working.

[BunnySlippers]

Does anyone know John Zmirak ?

[TigersEye]

I’ve never doubted her for a minute. I’ve know some Texas women like her. There isn’t a grain of BS in them. And if you’ve got any in you you’d best not let them see it.