Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rules Mail-In/Absentee Ballots with No Dates or Handwritten Name/Address Can be Counted!
Gateway Pundit ^ | 11/23/2020 | Cristina Laila

Posted on 11/23/2020 5:24:14 PM PST by SeekAndFind

The Pennsylvania State Supreme Court has once again shown its contempt for a free and fair election.

The PA Supreme Court on Monday ruled that mail-in/ballots with no dates or handwritten names/addresses on the outer envelopes can be counted.

The Trump campaign challenged the decision of the Philadelphia County Board of Elections to count 8,320 mail-in/absentee ballots arguing the voters failed to handwrite their name, address or the date (in some cases a combination of all three) on the outer envelope.

Trump’s legal team argued that the General Assembly set forth in the Election Code the requirements for how a qualified elector can cast a mail-in or absentee ballot.

A voter is required to “fill out, date, and sign” the declaration on the outside envelope the Trump campaign argued (citing 25 P.S. §§ 3146.6(a) and 3150.16(a)).

The Trump campaign argued that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that the requirements of the sections of Election Code impose mandatory obligations that the ballots cast falling short of these requirements cannot be counted.

The Philadelphia Board actually argued that the Election Code set forth by the General Assembly does not require them to set aside “timely-filed ballots” for “merely missing handwritten names, street addresses, and/or dates on the signed voter declaration.”

Who cares about filling out the outer envelopes? We are a banana republic.

The Trump team argued that a Pennsylvania court already invalidated 2,349 absentee ballots in Allegheny County where the voter didn’t date their declaration.

Commonwealth Court Judge P. Kevin Brobson last Thursday reversed a lower court judge and directed the “Elections Board to exclude the challenged 2,349 ballots from the certified returns of election for the County of Allegheny.”

“…[There] is an obvious and salutary purpose behind the requirement that a voter date the declaration. The date provides a measure of security, establishing the date on which the elector actually executed the ballot in full, ensuring their desire to cast it in lieu of appearing in person at a polling place. The presence of the date also establishes a point in time against which to measure the elector’s eligibility to cast the ballot, as reflected in the body of the declaration itself,” the judge wrote.

Judge Brobson said the votes in question will not be counted “because the votes are invalid as a matter of law.

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court shot down the Trump campaign’s argument and said voters failing to fill out their name/address and date on the envelope is just a “technical violation” of the Election Code and does not “warrant the wholesale disenfranchisement of thousands of Pennsylvania voters.”

“The decision of the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas is hereby affirmed. The decision of the Commonwealth Court is hereby reversed and the decision of the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas is reinstated.”

Incredible contempt for free and fair elections by the out of control PA Supreme Court. https://t.co/Rl0Y07Yha5

— Tom Fitton (@TomFitton) November 23, 2020



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: bananapennsylvania; bloggers; dirtypasupremes; dirtypennsylvania; dirtypennsyvania; election2020; electionfraud; joebiden; mailinballots; paping; pasupremecourt; pasupremesonarope; pennsylvania; signature; supremecourt; trump; voterfraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: SeekAndFind

Well of course they did. 🙄


21 posted on 11/23/2020 5:34:05 PM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Un-freaking-believeable!


22 posted on 11/23/2020 5:34:59 PM PST by Carriage Hill (A society grows great when old men plant trees, in whose shade they know they will never sit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Courts now null out the laws passed by the legislature

Rewrite them

Ignore them

Act like the legislature

Go after execuutive branches that use laws properly

Allow executive tyrants to ignore laws, or use laws unlawfully or outside scope of their power


23 posted on 11/23/2020 5:35:30 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I wonder if Rat Party operatives are playing a four corner defense here...aware that the President only has a very limited amount of time to prove the fraud.
24 posted on 11/23/2020 5:38:08 PM PST by Gay State Conservative (BLM Stands For "Bidens Loot Millions"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Disenfranchised voters?! They’re likely outright fraud!


25 posted on 11/23/2020 5:39:22 PM PST by Made In The USA (Ellen Ate Dynamite Good Bye Ellen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Not a surprise.


26 posted on 11/23/2020 5:41:29 PM PST by ScottfromNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zeddicus

Then what happens? A secession movement is the only answer.


27 posted on 11/23/2020 5:41:44 PM PST by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So now don’t we have a perfectly framed appeal for the USSC?


28 posted on 11/23/2020 5:43:39 PM PST by truthkeeper (All Trump Has Going for Him is the Votes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Irredeemably compromised.


29 posted on 11/23/2020 5:44:51 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (If the meanings in the Constitution can change, why did they bother writing it down?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: noiseman

Doesn’t matter if the computer code changes the count.


30 posted on 11/23/2020 5:45:54 PM PST by petitfour (APPEAL TO HEAVEN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

I cannot imagine the Supreme Court abiding this nonsense. It is an affront to the Constitution and makes an already corrupt election a ridiculous farce.


31 posted on 11/23/2020 5:46:26 PM PST by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip

Didn’t Bush v Gore advance from a decision by the Florida Supreme Court? Wouldn’t this be comparable?


32 posted on 11/23/2020 5:47:10 PM PST by truthkeeper (All Trump Has Going for Him is the Votes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BigEdLB

we should learn to cheat I guess....its all allowed...


33 posted on 11/23/2020 5:47:56 PM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Widget Jr

Taxation without representation. Absolute despotism.


34 posted on 11/23/2020 5:48:22 PM PST by momincombatboots (Ephesians 6... who you are really at war with)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

RE: I cannot imagine the Supreme Court abiding this nonsense.

We must always ask ourselves -— WHICH MEMBER OF THE SUPREME COURT?

Even John Roberts could possibly allow this nonsense to pass.

And if we ever have a Democrat controlled Senate, you can be certain that we’ll have more Justices who will abide by this nonsense.


35 posted on 11/23/2020 5:48:53 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The communists know they are in absolute control now...
This is the type of thing that proves my contention that there will be no more free elections...
The Soviet United States is here to stay...

The commissars and their apparatchiks have no fear...
Unfortunately non-communist Americans do not believe in fighting dirty against the 75-to-80 million communist scum who live among us...
No eye-gouging... No crushed testicles... No back-stabbing...

Now the result: No freedom... No liberty... No Constitution...

36 posted on 11/23/2020 5:49:14 PM PST by SuperLuminal (Where is Sam Adams now that we desperately need him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

And who is ultimately allowing these abuses of power? Its the USSC.

When abuses go unpunished they only get worse. And that’s what’s happened.


37 posted on 11/23/2020 5:50:52 PM PST by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Didn’t Justice Alito rule the opposite? The state Supreme Court can’t overrule him.


38 posted on 11/23/2020 5:51:11 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigEdLB

1) Chief Justice Thomas G. Saylor - REPUBLICAN

2) Max Baer - DemonRAT

3) Debra Todd - DemonRAT

4) Christine Donohue - DemonRAT

5) Kevin Dougherty - DemonRAT

6) David Wecht - DemonRAT

7) Sallie Updyke Mundy - REPUBLICAN

39 posted on 11/23/2020 5:52:19 PM PST by CivilWarBrewing (Get off my back for my usage of CAPS, especially you snowflake males! MAN UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SuperLuminal

The Soviet United States is here to stay...

***************

You can just say Soviet States since we’re no longer anything close to being united.


40 posted on 11/23/2020 5:52:21 PM PST by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson