Hmm. I’m beginning to think the Dominion voting machine methodology of reporting decimal numbers rather than integers (say, 1.03 for every Clinton vote to .97 for every Trump vote) in blue cities with large populations may be why Hillary was able to claim she won the popular vote. After all, it hasn’t made a difference - yet - by how big a margin she may have won in a blue state. Because excess votes in those states didn’t matter. But read my next paragraph!
And, even more ominous, Dominion software methodologies may be what’s being used to drum up ammunition to get rid of the electoral college by claiming that the popular vote does not validate its use. Thirteen states so far, after all, have pledged their electors to winners of the national popular vote - as soon as there are enough participating in the agreement - to reach 270 electoral votes!
Can any freeper think of any legitimate reason for any election voting system to store candidate vote totals as anything other than positive integers? I can't. Election voting systems that store vote totals as decimals instantly raises a red flag ("fraud alert, fraud alert").
I think some of these states just switched to dominion machines this year and at the same time, changed the rules to allow mail-in ballots to be sent out by the millions and had voting and/or ballots counting dates extended. Of course they didn’t do this through legislation as per the constitution, rather the governors, SOSs, AGs and judges made the rule changes which is unconstitutional.
It’s all been a banana republic operation, right down to the machines that are typically used in banana republics like Venezuela and Argentina.