Posted on 11/18/2020 8:18:59 PM PST by jzlouis
Lin Wood Files in Georgia. Full affidavit at the link.
Raffsberger huffed and puffed. He has created a situation he cannot extricate himself from. Lin Wood called his bluff. Raffy;s hand is a bust.
BRAVO SONS OF LIBERTY IN ACTION !
Read the whole thing. It’s EXCELLENT
Bfl
Ping!
Brian Kemp will be a one term Governor who lose in the primaries if he isn't recalled, and it won't even be close if he makes it to the next primaries.
This is like worst case, it confirms suspicions that it was stolen, but not enough to do anything about it.
p
"27. "the machines where not sealed or locked. The serial numbers where not what where not on the related documentation. Memory card was broken. I didn't put them into service"
Georgia
Did you read items 24 - 27 where she describes the condition of the election machines that showed up on election day without proper chain of custody? And that she was told to use broken, tampered with machines to vote in the election? That doesn’t sound circumstantial to me.
Having been in charge of a precinct before, we were instructed to call the county board of election maintenance hotline for anything like broken, missing, or mismatched seals. So they could be replaced. In fact the materials I picked up from the county the night before indicated how many machines would be delivered, and the serial numbers of the machines and the security bands were included on my documentation.
We had to record the numbers of the seals, machine serial numbers, protected counter information and final vote tally. When we packed up the machines we had to also apply new metal security bands which were numbered and record those numbers. All to ensure that these machines had a clearly defined chain of custody.
It’s appalling that machines were received with broken or missing seals and mismatched serial numbers. I would not in good consciences put those machines into service and I would under no circumstances sign my name on any document that recorded results from uncertified machines with broken chains of custody.
A well run election, with good security protocols and procedures in place would prevent this type of thing from happening. It’s astounding that in 2020, States are still having issues like this. There is absolutely no excuse and any precinct reporting numbers with these types of anomalies should have their counts excluded and voided.
How can the Executive Branch bow to the Judicial Branch in opposition to the Legislative branch with a lopsided consent decree made with one political party? The election is a fraud without any doubt.
I sure wish you were in charge.
Pray!
@llinwood - regarding his TRO
Good morning.
District Judge has scheduled an emergency hearing this afternoon in the case I filed against @GaSecofState.
In time, these names will also be part of litigation across the country:
Dominion Scytl SGO Smartmatic Clarity
TRUTH IS COMING
https://twitter.com/llinwood/status/1329408661802921984?s=21
I’d love to be. Voting integrity is one of my hot-button issues. Florida is usually a basket case but DeSantis cleaned up Broward and Palm Beach county and surprisingly they performed pretty well.
One of the things I really liked about the time I ran precincts in Virginia was several or the procedures in place that I think help combat fraud:
1. The Chief of Precinct and Assistant Chief of Precinct were by tradition opposite parties, with the Party of the current sitting Governor represented by the Chief and the Assistant Chief being from the opposition party.
2. We used Shouptronic 1242 voting machines at the time, and they contained memory cartridges and paper tape printers. Before opening the polls we had to set up the machines, validate serial numbers and security band numbers, and make sure the protected counters (basically a vote odometer that tallies the number of votes cast on the machine since it’s manufacture date) matched the number in our documentation. As well as validating that each machine showed 0 votes cast at the time of opening the polls. This information was printed on a paper tape which was captive in the machine and through a window both the Chief and Assistant Chief signed off on it.
3. We had to justify in writing any discrepancy between the poll book count indicating how many people checked in and how many votes were cast that day. I’d make regular checks of the machines throughout the day to make sure the number of people checked in matched the number of votes cast. I think in one case we had someone who checked in, was in line to vote, and got an emergency call where he had to leave before voting, which was documented.
4. When closing the polls, we had the counts on memory cartridges, including one machine which was to be set to totalize all votes from our precinct. The counts were signed off on by all the poll workers present, including recording of any write-ins. If I recall correctly, we phoned in the count as well to the county office.
5. The numbers for our precinct were written out on a document which was taped to the front door of the precinct. In this way anyone in public, whether concerned citizen or journalist could physically go to the polling location and see exactly the numbers which were recorded, signed off on, and returned to the county.
6. The machines were packed back up and sealed with a numbered, metal security band, which was recorded. All materials, documents, provisional ballots, paper tapes, and memory cartridges were placed back in a locked journal case and driven from the precinct to the county board of elections where we had to sign the materials back in.
Overall there were a lot of steps in the process, but it all seemed to minimize human error, require multiple eyes from both parties to witness the results, decentralize counting to the precinct level rather than have it all done in a back office in the county, except for validation/certification.
The Shouptronic 1242s had to be retired when the new federal regulations for machine design came down after the 2000 election. The first computer replacements we had I wasn’t nearly as comfortable with, as they used WiFi and Windows XP embedded to initialize and consolidate results.
Honestly, I’d love to work for a company or government agency who functions as a watchdog/consultant for validating processes and procedures related to election integrity. I think it’s probably the most important pillars which underpin confidence in our government.
Shouptronic 1242
https://verifiedvoting.org/election-system/danaher-shouptronic-1242/
But it also says they didn’t use those machines, so it looks bad, but had no effect on the outcome. Proof of tampering would be having one of those machines and examining the software installed to a see if it had been tampered with. Pointing to a machine that could have been tampered with isn’t proof that it actually would change votes.
I agree, it is much better case, but should have been filed before the voting started, or on election night. If the only way to rectify it is to throw out the entire election, and let the legislature pick the winner, then it is still a long shot courts, or the legislature, would want to flip the election.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.