Posted on 11/14/2020 5:08:23 PM PST by Kaslin
Until all the votes are counted and all the allegations of voter fraud are investigated, I think it’s too early to declare a winner in the 2020 race. You keep fighting. For now, the legal challenges are hitting snags in the courts. Still, President Trump should keep fighting to the end. We have dead people voting. We have allegations of ballots being illegally backdated. Everything should be looked at right now.
Was this election stolen? Well, millions feel that way. The turnout numbers are odd in some states, like Wisconsin, which hit 89 percent. Now, is that figure impossible? No. Wall Street Journal’s Kimberley Strassel did the math, but it’s highly improbable given the turnout rates in the surrounding areas. It would require 900,000 people showing up for same-day registrations. Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich was blunter last Sunday, when he said, “I think he would have to do a lot to convince Republicans that this is anything except a left-wing power grab, financed by people like George Soros, deeply laid in at the local level, and, frankly, I think that it is a corrupt, stolen election.” He was commenting on Biden’s call for unity. Yet, he also gave a hat-tip to someone we have written about here: Democracy Institute’s Patrick Basham.
“We believe these people are thieves, we believe the big city machines are corrupt,” the former House Speaker said. “Interestingly Patrick Basham, who's the most accurate pollster, he's British, wrote in a British newspaper...that this clearly was a stolen election, that it is impossible to imagine that Biden outran Obama in some of these states.”
Indeed, Basham quoted Joseph Stalin’s remarks about elections, where the Soviet dictator mentioned something about how it’s not important who votes but how they are counted, which appears to ring “eerily true” with this race. Basham has more in his piece in the Sunday Express, where he first highlighted how his data was again on the money regarding Democratic turnout, the shy Trump vote, and how the president’s law and order approach prevented catastrophic bleeding with suburban women voters. Suburban white women and urban black males were the shy Trump voters of this year. The president drew 10 million new supporters in 2020. He also took aim at the 2020 pollsters as a whole this cycle as well.
“If you count the ballot fraud, most pollsters clearly failed. If you don’t include the fraudulent ballots, most pollsters failed on a spectacular scale,” wrote Basham. Yet, here’s where things get fishy in the 2020 race which he mentions at the end of his column. He cites Richard Baris of Big Data Poll who noted something funny about Biden's numbers in the cities, how it lagged behind Clinton's numbers, but shot off to the moon in these four cities. Just take a look at the states in which these cities are located as well:
How curious that, as Baris notes, “Trump won the largest non-white vote share for a Republican presidential candidate in 60 years. Biden underperformed Hillary Clinton in every major metro area around the country, save for Milwaukee, Detroit, Atlanta and Philadelphia.”
Robert Barnes, the foremost election analyst, observes in these “big cities in swing states run by Democrats…the vote even exceeded the number of registered voters.”
Trump’s victories in Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin were on target until, in the middle of the night, counting was arbitrarily halted. Miraculously, several hundred thousand votes – all for Biden – were mysteriously ‘found’; Trump’s real leads subsequently vanished.
The protracted, eventual outcome will determine the contemporary relevance of Stalin’s observation. No matter who wins, most pollsters already have lost their credibility and influence.
Trump is still very much in 'Hail Mary' territory regarding pulling this out, but it’s no longer about this election. It’s about the next one. If Democrats can get away with these shenanigans this year, do you think they’ll stop?
I think you all know the answer to that question. You all know the kind of left-wing scum we’re dealing with here.
And here is the most telling proof of organized voter fraud so far!
This is exactly what I suspected, was just waiting the results. The massive unbelievable turnout for Biden is ONLY in the fraud harvesting communities that were needed to steal the election.
Dear Lord, please tell me Trump and his resources were capable of surveilling this fraud.
Great post! This is fight until death.
The Dems have balls.
It isn’t Evidence sadly.
It is an indication of fraud.
NuRulz
Thanks. I don’t know why those articles even get written, much less published. Maybe clickbait is the only goal now?
Joseph R. Biden 393,335 62.25% Donald J. Trump 226,197 35.80% Hillary Clinton 302,736 57.38% Donald J. Trump 196,082 37.16%Sleepy Joe performed well there too.
Let me guess: You're a Gimpublican.
Wake is woke.
They’re picking off singletons. People caught on their own or who can’t defend themselves. They won’t face anything they can’t clearly overpower.
Joseph R. Biden 375,630 85.3% Donald J. Trump 55,988 12.7% Hillary 345,084 85.0% Donald 37,688 9.3%Well, I found one anyway, where Biden and Trump had about the same improvement. My guess is that competitive states had more cheating but there's no way that Milwaukee, Philly, Detroit and Atlanta are substantively different from any other swing state cities.
“Let me guess: You’re a Gimpublican.”
I don’t know what that is, but I suspect you’re just a loudmouth.
Biden underperformed Hillary in Philly yet had 65,000 more in Montgomery County and 35,000 more in Delaware County. Complete fraud.
While the “only four cities” was crap, as you’ve illustrated, I do find it interesting that your two examples are from states the the Dems needed and that were close calls.
Plus, look at the numbers for Raleigh. 130,000 new voters in only four years? That’s a 24% increase in voters between 2016 and 2020, which seems weird to me. Still, it could happen, I suppose.
Ah, and now San Fran too. Keep them coming, Palmer. Maybe the author of the article will be shamed into doing more research before writing his next one.
By the way, there were 12 percent more votes in San Fran this time around.
So why was nothing done during the 4 years to fix this?
This was more critical than building the wall, space force & beefing up the military. Those would be done during 2nd term.
Without secure elections there will be no 2nd term.
It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to predetermine that the 3 states that were critical to Trump’s success that close counts brought him to victory in 2016 were Wisc, Mich, Pa. The wheelhouse of stealing an election occurs in black dominated cities and Philly, Detroit and Milwaukee were primed to overcome any Trump majority in the state with ballot dumps. In those cities when it comes to black folk, it is not one man, one vote. It is one man, 10 votes.
And it’s probably not true. First because it’s not likely only those cities cheated. Second because it’s not true in Richmond. I’m sure I’ll find many more if I look.
It’s not true. Biden won Jacksonville, FL (first Dem since Carter to do that) and did slightly better than Hillary in the Jax suburbs.
LA 2020
Donald 1,121,538 26.8%
Sleepy 2,980,478 71.2%
https://electionresults.sos.ca.gov/returns/president/county/los-angeles
What it appears to be is more potentially oversized Biden increases in states like NC. Whereas in California where the outcome was not in play, Trump had pretty decent improvement comparable or better than Biden's improvement. However in no cases did Biden do worse than Hillary. I have yet to find one anyway.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.