Posted on 11/13/2020 9:53:23 PM PST by Marcell
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ouLcNgv1oc&feature=emb_title
The above-displayed video does show a genuine clip from CNN. However, it is not evidence of wrongdoing. In fact, what this video shows isnt even very unusual. CNN, like most news networks, uses data from the National Election Pool to provide real-time election results during their coverage.
NBC News wrote:
The NEP is a consortium of major news networks ABC, CBS, CNN and NBC that pools together resources to gather vote and exit poll data. The NEP works with the consumer research firm Edison Research to collect timely and comprehensive election data on Election Day and in the following days, weeks and months until results are certified by all states. The NEP licenses data to several news outlets, including Reuters and The New York Times, among others.
The above-displayed video shows a momentary error in these real-time results. A source from CNN told us that this video showed a brief moment when the results were incorrectly transposed from the NEP and that this human error was caught, flagged, and quickly fixed (as shown in the video). This video is not evidence of a supercomputer hacking into the U.S. election system and altering vote counts. Its a video showing a momentary error that was quickly fixed thanks to the numerous safeguards in place to protect the integrity of elections.
(Excerpt) Read more at snopes.com ...
"human error was caught, flagged, and quickly fixed (as shown in the video)"
Only the video on youtube was altered to debunk the vote switch.
An image at 00:04 (when John King touches Wisconsin) was cut and pasted as the last frame to falsely make it appear the human error was corrected.
If it was human error, why didn't the CNN source provide the actual footage to show where the error was corrected?
Why would snopes post such a poorly executed fraud with this video?
I think most reasonable people realize how very significant the recorded live video on CNN of the 19,958 vote switch is.
It was a net stealing of 39,916 votes from President Trump.
The fact that the best snopes and CNN could come up with was a poorly altered video is very telling, in my opinion.
Because of this video.
The situation is even further out than it seems. Time to storm ones legislators, I think.
Here is how it is being done - in a manner which can be grasped and explained by we who are not IT people or mathematicians. Am watching it now, and will watch again, in order to do just that. Very very important - most likely best to watch before it is pulled.
The votes are not being counted. They are being estimated by machines, and being manipulated in real-time.
Thank you.
MIT PhD Analysis of Michigan Votes Reveals Unfortunate Truth of U.S. Voting Systems
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ztu5Y5obWPk&feature=youtu.be
I have been talking about the MIT study being evidence of Hammer and scorecard for several days now.
All you have to know is this: "The voting machines were connected to the Internet"
When I start hearing explanations from retards who don't have my level of expertise, I just hold up my hand and say "The voting machines were connected to the Internet".
The hero that shared this information with the world.
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1325500457331138567
A friend just sent this video she recorded election night.
Start of video PA total votes are:
Trump 1,690,589
Biden 1,252,537
At the end of the video the totals on the screen are for PA are:
Trump 1,670,631. -19,958 votes
Biden 1,272,495. +19,958
What a coincidence!
Because they were connected to the Internet...
It might be worth videotaping the altered copy with a smartphone or ipad to share in case it disappears.
It is the smoking gun.
Not a computer programmer or analyst or db or anything.
Trying to understand what has happened, and how, and disseminate the info.
looking at minute 14, minute 42-44, and minute 56. Oy.
Dr.SHIVA LIVE: MIT PhD Analysis of Michigan Votes Reveals Unfortunate Truth of U.S. Voting Systems.
744,264 views
Streamed live on Nov 10, 2020
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ztu5Y5obWPk&feature=youtu.be
Not helpful to call someone without your level of expertise “retards”. Would be helpful to dissect and condense this video for the rest of us. Thank you.
https://californiaglobe.com/section-2/the-sleight-of-hand-election-of-2020/
excerpts
The Sleight of Hand Election of 2020
This sort of imbalance defies the laws of Mathematics, Statistics, Gravity and Jimmy the Greek
By Craig Keshishian, November 12, 2020 4:45 pm
Im no magician but I know a couple of great ones, including my broker, who is famous in both professions (welcome to LA), but I doubt even my friend Stan can pull off the sort of trick I saw taking place at, oh, 2:00 in the morning of November 4th as I was watching the live feeds from Michigan and Pennsylvania roll in.
Im pretty good at counting votes before and after an election. Did it for Presidents and Prime Ministers, Senators and Governors as a pollster and strategist, so watching returns, doing the splits, figuring out the precincts that come in favorably for your guy or girl versus the ones that dont, all come second nature to me. Mostly because Ive been doing it for forty years, and when Im not counting votes, Im counting cards ( thats another article). So when you see in the middle of the night a dump of votes of about 28,000 come in for one candidate, Joe Biden, and NOT one single offsetting vote for Trump, then it raises more than just my eyebrow.
When you see vote totals streaming into a registrars office, they are usually variegated, (ie. 628 for Candidate Smith versus 327 for Candidate Jones). In my experience, I have never seen a segregated infusion like this ever. And Ive run elections in the Balkans and Eastern Europe, and observed them in even sketchier places. Never seen it happen. Ever.
Yes. I do not use those. Perhaps you might? Could be important.
Thank you.
AUTHOR: CRAIG KESHISHIAN
Craig Keshishian was educated at Cornell, Princeton, and Yale Law School, and served on the White House staff for President Ronald Reagan.
I did. You are welcome. I appreciate the interest.
AT&Ts new Chairman of the Board is William Kennard.
William Kennard also sits on the Executive Board of Dominion Voting Systems.
I was talking, of course, about the kollidge English majors who weren't smart to get a degree to teach English.
We know them as "jernalists". And retards.
Can refer to them as jah-whore-na-lists.
Emphasis on the second phoneme.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.