Posted on 11/12/2020 3:29:35 PM PST by Lockbox
Dominion’s exclusive AuditMark® technology is a unique, visual audit trail, allowing results to be audited down to each individual ballot. This patented process not only images and stores a copy of the ballot, but also appends to that image a record of how the voter’s selections were interpreted by the tabulator.
(Excerpt) Read more at edcgov.us ...
“In another thread, there was info (from Dominion user guide) on how to change and delete votes. Are the deleted ones still in the trail?, how are changes traced back?.”
I used to work with an electronic document imaging system for legal documents. One requirement for these systems is that nothing is ever deleted—ever.
When you make an update to a document, you actually make a copy and update that. You can have multiple generations of the document.
You don’t delete documents. You mark them as deleted, but they are still searchable and visible in the system.
If the Dominion system is following normal document imaging system protocols for legal documents, then you should be able to view every version of the document. Each version should be timestamped with the time of the changes and the user-id of the user that made the changes.
If not, then it’s a shitty system not worth the money anyone paid for it.
Unless the updates turned this “feature “ off
Bkmrk
Related discussion
Dominion Head of Security Previously Posted Antifa Manifesto Directed at Trump
Twitter ^
Posted on 11/12/2020, 6:06:31 PM by TigerClaws
Joe Oltmann @JoeOltmann · 6h This is a FB post from Dr. Eric Coomer. This is the Antifa “manifesto” letter to Trump. This is the man that is responsible for the strategy and Security of Dominion Voting Systems. I will post all of the posts here over the next couple of days. Share and follow.
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3905430/posts
Somebody BETTER HAD BETTER BE GETTING A JUDGE’S ORDER TO PRESERVE ALL RELATED DATABASES!
How does it audit R ballots that were thrown away and never counted?
Faking ballot images would not be difficult in a system purpose built for fraud.
“Hi voter, I’m your new Dominion. Just remember, you’re the slave.”
Looks like a marketing brochure from Dominion.
—
Indeed!
And you may be able to take the scanned images and make data files so that you can verify the actual scan and voting. The text looks like it is formatted in a way to be put into a database. and compared with the recorded vote totals. That would be one audit to ensure that the box read the ballot correct and then the info was transferred from each waypoint to the endpoint and each transformation.
My friend Pilot said:
“ IF...they have a concrete digital trail saved and backed up from the election night and after, its on like Donkey Kong.“
Do they?
I think it’s the old garbage in, garbage out rule. The system assumes ballots were correct, here’s one area they gamed the system.
See #33 answer
If never run through the machine, nothing to count or audit! That mostly the reason to trash ballots, nothing to see or find.
Just what you want in a capitalist election, a communist running it......
Understood. My point was that faking ballot images is not difficult.
According to the audit trail, the marked ballot and audit should match. But fake votes on paper run through the machine becomes audit information which Matches. Nice trick.
The splitting laws are pretty tough. And they are criminal.
Per Wiki..
Spoliation of evidence is the intentional, reckless, or negligent withholding, hiding, altering, fabricating, or destroying of evidence relevant to a legal proceeding.[1] Spoliation has three possible consequences: in jurisdictions where the (intentional) act is criminal by statute, it may result in fines and incarceration (if convicted in a separate criminal proceeding) for the parties who engaged in the spoliation; in jurisdictions where relevant case law precedent has been established, proceedings possibly altered by spoliation may be interpreted under a spoliation inference, or by other corrective measures, depending on the jurisdiction; in some jurisdictions the act of spoliation can itself be an actionable tort.[2]
“The spoliation inference is a negative evidentiary inference that a finder of fact can draw from a party’s destruction of a document or thing that is relevant to an ongoing or reasonably foreseeable civil or criminal proceeding: the finder of fact can review all evidence uncovered in as strong a light as possible against the spoliator and in favor of the opposing party.”
Darn spellchecker....
Trump needs to issue spoliation letters en mass to put them on official notice.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.