Posted on 11/10/2020 6:34:19 AM PST by WhoisAlanGreenspan?
Rather than sitting around steaming mad about this election theft and how judge Roberts is probably in on it, consider this;
After sitting on their hands for seven months by an incredible coincidence the "Conservative" Michigan Supreme Court ruled against Governor Whitmer hours after the Unlock Michigan petition filed 1/2 million signatures.
So it's possible the US Supremes could take notice.
Entire wording of petition follows.
In the most recent election we have witnessed the greatest injustice to the American voter. Our aim is to have the entire election recounted or re voted with better overwatch of how votes are received and counted. The voters of the United States of America are tired of the misrepresentation that the media gives to the election. We do feel there shall be a peaceful resolution to this most recent election. We feel certain States have acted unconstitutionally in the lack of transparency as to where votes have come from and how they have been processed. We also ask that no media outlet be able to report the votes cast for one candidate or the other until such time that 100% of the vote has been received and counted and verified. We ask this be mandated to all electoral races local, state and federal.
This is futile, the SCOTUS is not moved by broadly worded petitions from people without standing. The aggrieved parties must file the appropriate lawsuits.
Just let the system work, it’s designed for this.
People in MI,GA,WI, and AZ need to call their state reps and have them demand a full audit as the are authorized to do under Article II of the Constitution.
PA just did this yesterday.
And if they are not satisfied, they can then send their own slate of electors of refuse to send them on 14 Dec.
Again this is all constitutional, and in 3 prior elections, no candidate got the required EVs (which is 270 today), and the election went to the House.
In this case since the House votes are apportioned by the affiliations of the State Legislatures. Trump would win.
Gotta be careful about what you throw at the Supreme Court.
They don’t like intervening in state matters.
It has to be related to the constitution.
If you throw something at them, and they refuse to hear it, how that is interpreted by the media ends up doing a lot more damage.
Case in point:
Obamacare was attacked on a single point.
Roberts calls a penalty a tax, and suit against obamacare fails.
Media Translation: “All of Obamacare is constitutional”.
They also don’t like to be gaslighted by the Pa SOS who promised on 10/28 to set aside votes that came in after the election data for further consideration and instead goes ahead and authorises such votes to be counted anyway. That can not have made the affected justices very happy.
What PA did WAS a violation of the US Constitution.
CLEARLY within SCOTUS jurisdiction.
“US Constitution”
is that?
yes, i should have specified.
Yup!
The Michigan Supreme Court justices were fed the same BS that the vast majority of Michigan residents loved Governor Whitmers daily executive order punishments, and that the only people opposed carried assault guns and Confederate flags.
For seven months they did nothing. But hours after the petition was filed they ruled the law was unconstitutional. Think about it. The 1946 law used by the governor was unconstitutional.
There is certainly no time to get the cases through the courts, then conduct a revote in time for the slates to be confirmed before the Electoral College meets.
Philadelphia and adjacent area had election officials who just plain ruined their neighbors votes en masse.
Right. Like I said, I’m not very impressed with the wording on this like I wasn’t with the Unlock Michigan petition. I think it’s the numbers that are important.
Because of the BLATANTLY illegal way the mail in ballots were processed, the only recourse if a re-vote. A re-count would only re-include all of those ballots that should, BY LAW, be considered as spoiled.
“So it’s possible the US Supremes could take notice.”
Bo. it is not possible.
SCOTUS is not a politically elected body and is not to be concerned with trying to do “what’s popular”. In fact it should never be looking at popularity polls, petitions, or surveys on anything.
SCOTUS is supposed to sift the arguments presented in any case through what ONLY it understands about the Constitution and the laws, without regard to what is said to be “what folks want it to do”.
This petition campaign should be directed at state governors and states’ attorneys general, demanding they file adding their states to the GOP side in the cases that go to the SCOTUS, as two state attorneys general have done in the Pennsylvania case.
That does add “representation” weight to the plaintiffs side and when done right reinforces the GOP argument as being also an argument of the state governments joining the suit. It expands the national legal scope of concern beyond merely the state that is directly being sued. That is a “representation” scope matter that the SCOTUS can weigh, unlike a mere popularity petition.
I would rather see Trump demand a full recount, ballot by ballot (Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona & Nevada), with all counting disconnected from any vendor’s systems links that go beyond the location of the counting itself, and those counts manually retrieved from the local system, and those totals manually delivered to the state. And all of that taking place with total participation of bi-party observers at all times and those observers able to remove ballots for questioning and verification, for all ballots they feel that is necessary for, and that verification to take place with full transparency by bi-party teams. I would like to see the elected GOP reps in those states directly taking part as GOP observers in the process.
Agreed.
However I am concerned that we are not concentrating on the only explicitly Constitution remedy available, having the State Legislatures step in and replace the slate of electors or prevent the election from being certified via Article II of the Constitution.
This is the only explicitly Constitutional way which has succeeded 3 times before.
Epstein already called in his vote to Roberts ...
.. who then created this mess where ELECTION DAY mutated
under the novel virus and dirty DNC software [’gliches’]
to ‘whatever time it takes to stop the exposure’.
SCOTUS has no authority to call for elections. And would never do it.
If the PA election is found to be invalid, it’s up to the PA legislature to act on a remedy.
If we're NOT willing to drop this inquiry into voter fraud and 'heal & come together' with Biden, FOXNews thugs, Democrat goons, BLM, and Antifa they'll beat us up again and burn down our cities.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.