Posted on 11/10/2020 6:16:32 AM PST by JOHN ADAMS
At issue was President Trumps request for an order changing the way Pennsylvania absentee and mail-in ballots are being reviewed at the Philadelphia Convention Center.
Legacy media are lying when they claim that all of President Trumps allegations of voter fraud are baseless. I know, because I argued a case on the presidents behalf in federal court in Philadelphia.
At issue was President Trumps request for an order changing the way Pennsylvania absentee and mail-in ballots are being reviewed at the Philadelphia Convention Center. CNN and others claim he lost. Thats false: he won. As I made that argument on behalf of the presidents campaign, I can tell you what really happened.
(Excerpt) Read more at thefederalist.com ...
There is enough violation of election law relating to allowing poll watchers to see fraud that large blocks of votes can be excluded.
Based upon the final outcome of Florida in Bush vs Gore, I expect that the Democrats will do everything they can to block recounts as recounts will disclose fraud.
Trump can checkmate the Democrats by putting them in a position if recounts or throw the election to the House where Trump will win based upon Republican State Legislatures, which are the majority, voting for Trump.
All it takes is for Trump to get Republican Legislatures in swing states to not certify the vote due to fraud.
Pennsylvania-20
Michigan-16
Arizona-11
Wisconsin-10
Georgia-16
North Carolina if needed-15
Assume Biden currently 290 less PA 20-MI16-AZ11-WI10-GA16 = 217
(way under 270)
If any of the Republican state houses in the list, plus Pennsylvania refuse to certify the vote, Biden is screwed.
My point is that all Trump must do is get the Republican Houses to challenge the vote, exactly as Pennsylvania did last Saturday...
This is Trumps fall back plan...
Remember the December 6, deadline. That is what screwed Gore in 2000
mark
btt
Bkmk
Take careful notice of all the ones are that are saying the election was honest; no voter fraud. See anything that doesn’t look quite right?
The LEFTIST election strategy: Loosey Goosey/Eazy Peezy
Ping!
Pennsylvania Ping!
Please ping me with articles of interest.
FReepmail me to be added to the list.
There is no wide spread voter fraud. Just thousands of confirmable individual cases of cheating.
Legacy media are lying when they claim that all of President Trumps allegations of voter fraud are baseless. I know, because I argued a case on the presidents behalf in federal court in Philadelphia.
At issue was President Trumps request for an order changing the way Pennsylvania absentee and mail-in ballots are being reviewed at the Philadelphia Convention Center. CNN and others claim he lost. Thats false: he won. As I made that argument on behalf of the presidents campaign, I can tell you what really happened.
President Trump went to court about two problems: First, only a handful of Republican observerssubstantially fewer than the Democrats had therewere being admitted to the room at the Philadelphia Convention Center where inspections were being conducted. Second, the few who could get in werent permitted to get close enough to see what was actually happening. The most important questions all have to ask are: Why all the hiding? Whats being hidden?
At the Convention Center counting location, I personally observed dozens of Trump campaign volunteers being barred from the counting room even though theyd been properly registered as observers. Thats why I urged Pam Bondi and Corey Lewandowski, who were on the scene, to authorize the filing of a request that a federal court order the Board of Elections to stop this nonsense.
More hiding: despite a binding order of the states Commonwealth Court, the handful of Republican observers who could get into the room werent being allowed up to the barrier set at six feet from the closest tables where work was being done. So even though they were in the room where it was happening, they had no way to tell what was happening. If theres no fraud, why is the Democrat-controlled Board of Elections unwilling to let people get close enough to actually see what its people are doing?
So on a borrowed laptop at around 2 p.m. on election day, I typed up a very short document to start a federal lawsuit and to request that the federal court intervene to prohibit these unfair practices. At about 4:30 p.m., its filing was authorized by the campaign.
The federal judge ordered a hearing that began at 5:30 p.m. and went for two hours. In open court, the judge compelled the Board of Elections to agree that the Republicans could have up to 60 representatives in the room. That was a huge victory, not only for Republicans but for anyone who actually wants to have a vote tabulation worthy of belief.
He also compelled the board to agree that all observers, Democrat or Republican, could get up to the six-foot barrier. While the Democrats claimed that of course, of course, they had always been letting people in and letting them up to the barrier, I had a long list of witnesses who were prepared to testify that this was false. The judge told the defendants pointedly that if they didnt do what theyd promised in his courtroom they would, he had plenty of authority to make them keep their word.
Having secured this agreement from the Board of Elections, the court dismissed the presidents motion for court-ordered relief as moot. Courts often do that when they secure an agreement between the parties. It means the court doesnt have to issue an order, which would be appealable, granting or denying the motion, and it means the court doesnt have to write an opinion. What it doesnt mean is that the request made on behalf of President Trump to stop the election fraud was moot, despite the false spin CNN and other mainstream media put on it. All of this was a victory for President Trump and anyone else who believes in open government.
Im no longer surprised by anti-Trump non-news coming from the likes of CNN. But I cannot imagine why Pennsylvania Republican leaders have suggested theres no reason to think that anything wrong or fraudulent is going on in the counting of Pennsylvanias votes.
If that were true, why in the world would the Democratic-controlled city government be working so hard to keep Republicans out of the room where those votes are being counted? In a world where every car that drives down the street is on video, why isnt all of this counting being conducted in broad daylight, under watchful eyes? What do they have to hide?
Other people have gathered substantial evidence that there are indeed things to hide, including this video showing, among other things, footage of government officials wearing Joe Biden facemasks filling in blanks in already-submitted mail-in votes. The hearing I attended wasnt about that, but it was about the conditions that make that possible.
No one who wants a legitimate vote count should be working to keep observers out of the room where the votes are counted. Yet for some reason the City of Philadelphia sent three lawyers, including the city solicitor himself, to a hearing to try to persuade a federal judge that he shouldnt even bother addressing President Trumps request.
Fortunately, the federal judge didnt take that advice, and he forced the Board of Elections to do the right thing. I call that a solid victory for everyoneexcept for those with something to hide. For some reason, all of this hiding was being done by Democrats, for Biden.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.