[ClearCase_guy]

Honestly, I think this is a weak angle.

Joe Frazier voted this year. Other dead people did too. How many can you find? 500? 1000? It’s not a significant number. It didn’t determine the outcome. They will not give you a “do over” because Joe Frazier voted.

You need large numbers of orchestrated fraudulent votes. The Software is a promising angle. Holding up obituaries is a poor distraction.

[HarleyD]

I don't think this is such a weak angle. Consider the election results so far:

WI-Vote Margin 20,540 (10 electorial votes)

PA-Vote Margin 45,727 (20 electorial votes)

NE-Vote Margin 34,283 (6 electorial votes)

MI-Vote Margin 146,123 (16 electorial votes) (This is one of the places where the 200,000 votes mysteriously appeared)

GA-Vote Margin 10,353 (16 electorial votes)

AZ-Vote Margin 16,985 (11 electorial votes)

270 is the magic number and Biden has 290. Out of this list it won't be hard to produce enough frauduent signatures to change this outcome.

[Cboldt]

PA taking ballots after Tuesday is big too.

One thing the enemy is doing is the usual strawman debunking. No evidence of widespread, same method, across all states, coordinated with detailed instructions from corporate HQ to steal the election. Therefore no cheating is systemic, and the election wasn’t stolen.

All manner of cheating was employed. Out of state, dead, ballot box stuffing, software glitches, and ways you haven’t ever thought of. Who needs instructions? The play book is old. wait for downstate to come in, shut down counting, manufacture ballots, resume counting, we win. Every state does that independently.

Assume for argument the dead vote is a distraction. It at least shows somebody deliberately harvested those. Should be shocking. Oh, but it’s only a few thousand. Only a few thousand?!

My gut is telling me that by the time the dust settles, this election is not going be one of those “marginal” decisions like Bush v. Gore - a few chads in West Palm Beach.

[ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton]

Yeah but cheaters gonna cheat. I hope he has more compelling evidence that he is not going forward with at this time to allow them to destroy evidence but it shows clear cut undeniable fraud.

[MayflowerMadam]

“500? 1000? It’s not a significant number.”

IIRC, in one state alone, there were over 14,000, which I would call “a significant number”.

[dbehsman]

I agree, however the more preposterous and comical you can make the election, the more people will be inclined to support you when the Supreme Court follows the law.

[trebb]

If that was the showcase, it would be a weak angle - as part of a more comprehensive laying out of facts, it has it’s place.

[ridesthemiles]

HOW many people OVER 100 are registered to vote in YOUR state?

That is more fertile ground, IMO

[Svartalfiar]

You need large numbers of orchestrated fraudulent votes. The Software is a promising angle. Holding up obituaries is a poor distraction.

Holding up dead people voting is one of the most effective methods for swaying public opinion on this issue. Software isn't a visible thing, especially for voters using paper ballots. But provable dead people voting? That's definitely fraudulent! Also, where the dead vote, there's bound to be many other forms of fraud, so since dead voters are easy to find, it helps give you the most likely counties to start looking for more fraud in.

And who knows? I've seen reports that some counties had thousands of dead votes - eliminating that that may be enough to flip some counties, giving us more downticket races. And as it adds up, maybe just the dead vote lets Trump flip a State or two.

In addition, if there's hundreds or thousands of obviously fake votes in one place, that could easily be cause to completely decertify that entire county - potentially meaning the legit 60-40 Biden vote in the State's biggest Dem city is canceled.