Posted on 11/05/2020 4:02:57 AM PST by Jacob Kell
After four years of being accused of every form of bigotry on earth (and some that have yet to be discovered), Republicans brought home the largest share of non-white voters since 1960.
The last time Republicans had numbers like these, Democrats were the segregationist party.
(Excerpt) Read more at frontpagemag.com ...
Without that censorship and control over information, It would have been a Trump landslide.
America is better than Blue.
When you say a “Blue State”, what you’re saying is the majority of our fellow Americans willingly voted for a criminal who has used the power of the US Govmt to shake down nations for his own pocket, who endorses illegal substance use and abuse among family members and in his own home, as well as pedophilia.
We are a better nation than that. A “Blue State” is one who’s electoral processes have been so gradually, incrementally, and thoroughly corrupted in ALL its forms that the residents have been conditioned to accept that their American ideals are a minority among a sea of fraudulent socialists. None ever think twice after thirty five years, of carefully and critically policing the voting process using contemporary digital tools.
What I find FAR easier to believe, is that as of Reagan’s a$%-kicking in 1984 the small number of American socialists began a program of gradually organized corruption of the Federal Elections that has proceeded incrementally across the country relatively unimpeded-and that in this election, in their brazenness, now they have attempted to extend this process into the remaining relatively un-corrupted states.
The American Left KNOWS 21st century digital balloting is coming and that when it does all this is exposed.
Following the strong Republican turn out by Hispanics -
DNC CALLS FOR RAPID COMPLETION OF SOUTHERN BORDER WALL!
Nancy Pelosi - “Send those dreamers back home where they belong!”
Great read.
Almighty God: We make our earnest prayer that Thou wilt keep the United States in Thy holy protection; that thou wilt incline the hearts of the citizens to cultivate a spirit of subordination and obedience to government, and entertain a brotherly affection and love for one another and for their fellow-citizens of the United States at large. And finally that Thou wilt most graciously be pleased to dispose us all to do justice, to love mercy and to demean ourselves with that charity, humility and pacific temper of mind which were the characteristics of the Divine Author of our blessed religion without a humble imitation of whose example in these things we can never hope to be a happy nation. Grant our supplication, we beseech Thee, through Jesus Christ, our Lord. Amen.
This is why the fraud was needed in Michigan against not only Trump but also John James. The last thing that the establishment would ever want would be a young black conservative Republican in the Senate to counter against Romney, Harris, Murkowski, and other such Swamp creatures.
Article from Thursday:
“Trump’s Diverse Coalition Buried Obama’s Race-Baiting Politics”
By Daniel Greenfield, The Sultan Knish
Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam.
Ping or FReepmail me to get on or off the Daniel Greenfield Ping! list.
Be sure and visit Frontpage Mag for excellent commentary.
...Black Lives Matter movement was meant to boost black turnout, instead black support for Trump grew.
The Colorado counties that shifted to Trump were majority Latino.
31% of Latinos, 30% of Asian Americans, and 12% of black people voted for Trump. Among black men, a shockingly unprecedented 18%, or nearly 1 in 5, cast their votes for him.
And,significantly, in the ‘Other’ category of people who are not white, but don’t fit into one of these categories on account of either being mixed race or another minority, 40% voted Trump.
28% of people who identify as gay, lesbian or transgender also voted for him.
In Florida, 47% of Latinos and 43% of Jews voted for Trump.
Too bad the "Morning Joe' haters and sycophants can't see this... blinded by their own prejudices... Hello Joe Scarborough
Without that censorship and control over information, It would have been a Trump landslide.
The natural disposition is always to believe. It is acquired wisdom and experience only that teach incredulity, and they very seldom teach it enough. The wisest and most cautious of us all frequently gives credit to stories which he himself is afterwards both ashamed and astonished that he could possibly think of believing. — Adam Smith, Theory of Moral Sentiments (1759)“A man convinced against his will
is of the same opinion still.”The critical point is that the desire to believe makes everyone gullible. It’s actually surprising that propaganda doesn’t have more effect than it does.
But to your point, Mr. Trump must sue for libel, in the teeth of the unanimous 1964 New York Times Co. v. Sullivan decision. In which the Warren Court (Brennan writing) asserted that
". . . libel can claim no talismanic immunity from constitutional limitations. It must be measured by standards that satisfy the First Amendment”Now we all love us some freedom of the press, but that is BS.Ever wonder why pornography restrictions survived the First Amendment? Simply because the first eight amendments do not enumerate all rights extant in the founding era; assaying to do so would have been a fool’s errand. The Bill of Rights is a set of amendments rather than incorporated into the document at the constitutional convention because of that fact. Rights were and are matters of Common Law, nowhere comprehensively codified then or now. The Federalists did not want rights to be an issue for that reason, and the Antifederalists backed them into a corner and forced them to promise a bill of rights by amendment.
Since they couldn’t possibly enumerate all rights, the Federalists then enumerated those rights which historically had been abused by tyrants. And they covered the rest of the waterfront with the general points made in
and
- Amendment 9
- The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
- Amendment 10
- The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Since no reference to pornography laws exists in the First Amendment, the ninth and tenth amendments apply, and pornography laws extant before the ratification of the Bill of Rights are still respected by SCOTUS today.
And since no reference to
pornographylibel laws exists in the First Amendment, the ninth and tenth amendments apply, andpornographylibel laws extant before the ratification of the Bill of Rightsareshould still be respected by SCOTUS today.We all treasure freedom of the press, tho - and there is IMHO a way out of the conundrum that criticism of our leaders must be untrammeled on the one hand, and on the other hand libel - blatant violation of the ninth commandment - must be controlled. The answer, IMHO, is that wire service journalism and FCC regulated broadcast journalism - and, most clearly of all, PBS/NPR - must be subject to libel law. Less powerful propaganda organizations can perhaps be subject to less stringent versions thereof.
These are illuminating statistics! Thanks, GOPJ
I am hoping the new SCOTUS will take such a case.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.