Biden Plans to “Assert Control” as President-Elect if Declared Winner by News Organizations ... Even if Trump refuses to concede.

https://summit.news ^ | Published 1 min ago on 3 November, 2020 | Paul Joseph Watson

[forgotten man]

He cannot exert control of his bowels.

[Buckeye McFrog]

Plus let’s face it, Joe Biden can barely assert control over his bladder.

[EVO X]

No presidentential contending democrat has conceded loss on election night since the 1980s.

_________________________________

Hillary actually did concede to Trump. It is likely she was in no mental shape to give a concession speech to her supporters. She was either hammered or had other medical issues such as Parkinsons sundown..

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hillary-clinton-privately-concedes-in-phone-call-to-donald-trump/

[The Duke]

I've seen this happen successfully before at the state level, when Gov. Ray Blanton was ousted from the governorship of TN prematurely:

http://www.tn4me.org/sapage.cfm/sa_id/258/era_id/9/major_id/24/minor_id/78/a_id/243

[Bshaw]

Sit down Joe, the American electorate is in the process of assuming control over you.

[loveliberty2]

"Assert control"?? Has he read the U. S. Constitution or the writings of the Framers of that Constitution for a free people??

"Ideas have consequences." - Weaver

Decades of liberal/progressive efforts to censor, erase and deny the underlying ideas of liberty upon which the U. S. Constitution was framed have had consequences.

Our Constitution embodied a UNIQUE IDEA. Nothing like it had ever been done before. The power of the idea was in the recognition that people's rights are granted directly by the Creator - not by the state - and that the people, then, and only then, grant rights to government. The concept is so simple, yet so very fundamental and far-reaching.

CREATOR

People

Government

America's founders embraced a previously unheard-of political philosophy which held that people are "...endowed BY THEIR CREATOR with certain unalienable rights.." This was the statement of guiding principle for the new nation, and, as such, had to be translated into a concrete charter for government. The Constitution of The United States of America became that charter.

Other forms of government, past and present, rely on the state as the grantor of human rights. America's founders, however, believed that a government made up of imperfect people exercising power over other people should possess limited powers. Through their Constitution, they wished to "secure the blessings of liberty" for themselves and for posterity by limiting the powers of government. Through it, they delegated to government only those rights they wanted it to have, holding to themselves all powers not delegated by the Constitution. They even provided the means for controlling those powers they had granted to government.

This was the unique American idea. Many problems we face today result from a departure from this basic con­cept. Gradually, other "ideas" have influenced legislation which has reversed the roles and given government greater and greater power over individuals. Early generations of Americans pledged their lives to the cause of in­dividual freedom and limited government and warned, over and over again, that eternal vigilance would be required to preserve that freedom for posterity.

---

Footnote: "Our Ageless Constitution," W. David Stedman & La Vaughn G. Lewis, Editors (Asheboro, NC, W. David Stedman Associates, 1987) Part III:  ISBN 0-937047-01-5

[bayliving]

Riigghhtt....

The guy can’t even assert control over the English language...

I’m just going to get this out here now. If the democrats try this, I do not consent.

[dsc]

“Trump will be reelected President when the Secretary of State in each of the 50 states certify the elections of their states and when the electors of those states cast their ballots at the electoral college.”

Is there a legal basis to disqualify states that refuse to certify their elections?

[ought-six]

“If this were to happen then every patriot is called to duty to run into the streets and protest.”

It is the duty of every patriot to protect his country from its government.

[BeauBo]

Normally, a President elect would not “assert control” until inauguration day.

I guess the climate/race/whatnot crisis is too urgent for those kinds of delays anymore.

The Left is increasingly unmoored from reality.

[ConservativeInPA]

Good question. I do not know of a case where a SoS hasn’t certified an election. I know election results are often challenged after the SoS certifies.

[ronnie raygun]

Stop the sillyness, Im so sick of these people, GET OUT AND VOTE

[IamConservative]

Joe Biden is planning to address the nation and “assert control” as the president-elect if he is declared winner by news organizations

Guess I'm old fashioned. I thought voters determined the winner.

[longtermmemmory]

I am looking for biden camp to declare victory at 7:00:01 and then start demanding Trump conceed “for the children”

[longtermmemmory]

Biden (through his bagman son) can start cutting financial deals with other foreign nations and companies. He can start early bird selling out the usa.

[NewJerseyJoe]

"Assert control??"

The Constitution and federal law pretty clearly spell out how the process works -- and "assert control based on news reports" appears nowhere in that process.

[Buckeye McFrog]

The Left is increasingly unmoored from reality.

That's the nub of the problem. Like the old Mythbusters show they reject our reality and substitute their own.

[Osage Orange]

He’s a puppet....someone is pulling his strings.

[Buckeye McFrog]

And if you were going to pull this kind of stunt Joe Biden in 2020 is singularly incapable of pulling it off.

[MrChips]

Biden can’t “assert control” over how much toothpaste he squirts out of the tube.