Posted on 10/27/2020 5:11:02 AM PDT by Kaslin
As far as HuffPost and the rest of the American left are concerned, no non-left-wing idea should be allowed to enter an American school. Not even for five minutes.
This past month, Maumee High School, a high school near Toledo, Ohio, offered its students a way to receive some extracurricular credit. In the words of the Maumee City Schools administration office -- released before the HuffPost-induced uproar:
"Students were offered an extra credit assignment intended to challenge their critical thinking skills ... A second option in the extra credit assignment asked students to view a video from a conservative website, analyze it and explain what they may have learned from it, and how it may have challenged or supported their own beliefs. ...
"We believe that students deserve a balanced presentation of materials and we support our educators in using a variety of instructional tools and materials in their teaching, expecting them to always exercise good judgement."
In an open and liberal society, the stated aims of Maumee High School are not only not controversial but also laudable. They are exactly what good parents and educators would want for students.
So, who finds these aims revolting?
Only an anti-liberal ideology. Namely, the left.
It all started with one -- yes, one -- parent. She so objected to a PragerU video being offered as a conservative option that she withdrew her child from the class. And then she contacted HuffPost.
Thus began a national left-wing uproar over students being offered extra credit if they chose to view a five-minute conservative video.
The HuffPost headline: "Videos From Right-Wing Site That Preaches 'The Left Ruins Everything' Assigned In Ohio School."
A few observations about the headline:
First, on the left, everything nonleft is "right-wing." The reason? Because "conservative" is not inflammatory enough.
Second, the video "The Left Ruins Everything" was never "assigned." No specific video was assigned.
Third, the HuffPost writer, Rebecca Klein, chose the most controversial title she could find out of approximately 450 PragerU videos.
Fourth, the video makes clear that it is about leftism, not liberalism.
Fifth, ironically, this whole story validates the video: Look at what the left is doing to schools, to liberal education and to open inquiry.
As the HuffPost itself reported:
"Andrea Cutway, the mother of 16-year-old student Avery Lewis, brought the assignment to the attention of Maumee City Schools administrators and immediately pulled her daughter out of the class. ... Lewis was immediately alarmed when she started her extra credit assignment last week. The assignment asked her to watch PragerU videos and then answer questions about how the videos challenged her beliefs. ... Cutway, Lewis' mother, was similarly shocked when her daughter showed her the assignment. ... 'It's ALT RIGHT propaganda,' Cutway said in the email to the school principal.
"Lewis met with school administrators soon after to discuss the issue. Together, they came up with a solution -- that the student could also include viewpoints from the opposite side, Cutway said.
"For Cutway, though, this ignored the larger issue -- that PragerU videos be assigned at all and that school administrators did not see a problem (italics added) ...
"'When I talked to the principal and vice principal, they acted like this was just another assignment,' said Cutway, who works as a juvenile parole officer for the state. ... 'This really is some scary stuff,' Cutway said of PragerU. 'I do feel like they have found a way to get into the public school system.'"
As a result of the HuffPost article, mainstream media went nuts, contemplating the possibility that American students might watch five minutes of non-left thought.
NBC TV in Toledo tweeted:
"HuffPost reports that a Maumee High School class is offering students extra credit for viewing videos from a right-wing source. Are you a Maumee parent? How would you feel about this?"
ABC TV in Toledo headlined:
"Maumee parent raises concerns over controversial assignment."
And the station broadcast a report on "Maumee High School alumni petition politics in the classroom" about more than 200 alumni objecting to the use of any PragerU video. The broadcast featured a 2001 graduate of the school, Catherine Wood, the organizer of the petition, who told the ABC-TV station, PragerU videos "kind of deny the humanity of many groups of students: people of color, women, LGBTQ members."
Catherine Wood lied. There is nothing in any PragerU video that demeans or in any way "denies the humanity" of people of color, women or LGBTQ members. Not to mention that we have women, people of color and gays presenting videos. Her libel exemplifies something I have said all my life: Truth is not a left-wing value.
But left-wing lies often work. Within days, the inevitable took place. As The Toledo Blade headlined: "Maumee Removes Conservative Content From Class Syllabus."
For the record, here is a small sample of PragerU presenters:
Four Pulitzer Prize-winning journalists.
Three former prime ministers -- of Denmark, Spain and Canada.
Professors at MIT, Stanford, Harvard, Princeton, Vanderbilt and many other universities.
The late Charles Krauthammer.
At least four "Never Trumpers" (George Will, Bret Stephens, Jonah Goldberg and Michael Medved).
Liberal Democrat Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz.
Jewish historian Rabbi Joseph Telushkin.
Wall Street Journal columnists Kimberley Strassel and Jason Riley.
Economists Lee Ohanian (University of California, Los Angeles) and Walter Williams (George Mason).
British historians Paul Johnson, Andrew Roberts and Niall Ferguson.
Mike Rowe of "Dirty Jobs" fame.
Philip Hamburger, the Maurice and Hilda Friedman Professor of Law at Columbia Law School.
Peter Caddick-Adams, fellow of the Royal Historical Society.
Five-time Emmy award-winning journalist Sharyl Attkisson.
Dr. Stephen Marmer, psychiatrist and clinical faculty at UCLA Medical School.
Would any of these people join PragerU if it were a "right-wing, ALT-RIGHT demeaner of people of color, women, and LGBTQ"? (Incidentally, PragerU has a video titled "What Is the Alt-Right." Those of the left accusing PragerU of "alt-right propaganda" would do well to watch it.)
Moreover, PragerU has videos on happiness, forgiveness, the ethics of speech, the Ten Commandments, anger management and raising good children, among many others that have nothing to do with politics.
But none of this matters to HuffPost or to the 200 alumni of Maumee High School.
All that matters to them is that an effective, responsible, thoughtful conservative voice never be heard at Maumee or any other high school.
Probably a thousand teachers have shown PragerU videos, and many more are refusing to be intimidated by the bullies of the left.
Leftists fear that five minutes of conservative thought will undo four years of left-wing teaching.
Their fear is justified. Their opposition isn't.
“Leftists fear that five minutes of conservative thought will undo four years of left-wing teaching.”
Because it will.
Interesting, but well known:
That is so true.
We have yet to grasp just how truly evil Democrats have become.
I Learned More at McDonalds Than at College
Can't have young kids seeing THIS kind of thing, but all the other filth put forth by the Left, well...that's all good.
The communists have a stranglehold on public education that needs to be broken..and soon. They cannot stand the very idea of critical individual thought at any level. They need to be gone.
Not true. I’m well aware of their neogenocidal tendencies.
Keep your powder dry.
I think, seeing the Obama, Biden and Clinton Family Crime outfits, we have finally got a good idea.
Astonishingly, it looks like the Bidens might be the most disgusting and corrupt, which is saying a lot. At least Bill Clinton wasn't knowingly empowering sexual abuse of his family members like Biden, although he and Obama were selling our country out to our enemies.
The best part is that all this uproar on the left will ensure that 10x the number of students will now view the PragerU videos than if the left ignored the assignment.
"so why should we let someone teach social science that we know to be wrong in our social science courses?"
Because it is possible that you are wrong.
Science is not mathematics. Newtonian physics was wrong.
And social science is a further three rungs down in certainty from science.
Your level of certainty and arrogance about what can be said, and probably thought, smacks of religion, and not science. This is a political religion that permeates academia at the moment. And which I am fairly sure you will swear does not infect you, while the rest of us can see the symptoms quite plainly.
Only religions ban heretics from speaking because of the wrong-think they might cause. Real science loves a good heretic. In fact, honestly, the entire goal of science is to be a heretic. To have an idea that no other person ever had. Science is the pretty much the antithesis of your thought-police approach.
And most of academia used to be the antithesis of your thought police approach as well, until the religion of leftism took it over, with the direct help of people like you.
“Leftists fear that five minutes of conservative thought will undo four years of left-wing teaching.”
They fear ANY opportunity for our children to hear anything contrary to their religion (cultural Marxism).
They will NOT allow a conservative camel’s nose under THEIR tent (though they’ve shoved their leftist camels noses into tents all over America for decades).
This event speaks loudly of their insecurity about their dogma. They know in their hearts that leftism/socialism/communism does not happen unless coerced and forced the masses.
Our children have been specifically targeted a century by our pubic schools, news, media, churches and now social media.
We had John Dewey’s early 1900’s Progressive (Marxist) anti-home schooling influence, followed by The Frankfurt School’s mid-1900’s social Marxist plan for children, then Hollywood’s 1950’s communist influences, then NEA’s No God push in our schools.
Then, the 1960’s CPUSA push of college youts for war protests, drug use and wanton fornication, then the 1980’s sitcoms ridiculing parents, then the 1990’s queer push, then the 2000’s self-esteem facade.
Now, MSM, SJW groups and social media are pushing "social justice" and stirring them to riot and destroy -- the anarchy needed before stepping in as heros to "save America".
Liberals will have conservative programs on as background noise to keep themselves believing they are independent.
the entire left ALWAYS collapses in the face of rational thought and decision-making.
proving socialism/communism are thought disorders
“The best part is that all this uproar on the left will ensure that 10x the number of students will now view the PragerU videos than if the left ignored the assignment.”
The unintended consequence of liberal outrage.
We’ve had 8 years of indoctrination of Obamajugend/Obama Youth. Mmmm mmm mm.
Thanks Howard Zinn and Bill Ayers.
It is a religion to them and Karl Marx is their infallible prophet
School debate team activities must be a real laugh considering one viewpoint would always be considered unthinkable
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.