Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Amy Coney Barrett confirmation: What happens next, how to follow it [excellent account of Senate confirmation process and procedures]
KIRO7 ^ | 10/20/2020 | Debbie Lord

Posted on 10/22/2020 10:41:16 AM PDT by catnipman

Here’s a look at what will likely happen in the coming week:

McConnell has said he would put the nomination on the floor of the Senate on Friday. McConnell cannot put the nomination forth on the same day it comes out of committee via Senate rules.

When he does put it to the Senate as a whole, he must move the Senate into executive session, meaning that the senators take up that issue alone.

After the nomination is read, McConnell could file cloture – or a measure to end any debate on the nomination – then a day must go by before the Senate can vote on the cloture motion.

Then on Sunday, the cloture petition would be ready for a vote. That vote would curb any filibuster, or debate that would delay the vote on the nomination.

On Sunday, the Senate can begin voting on the cloture petition (to end debate) one hour after the Senate meets.

Once the Senate votes on cloture, opponents may use up to 30 hours on the clock before a final confirmation vote. That means if the Senate votes on Sunday, the final vote on Barrett’s nomination could come as early as Monday.

(Excerpt) Read more at kiro7.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: barrett; confirmation; senate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: pfflier

“Expect the dims to boycott that too. They will all run and hide like a bunch of roaches.”


Good:

First, it will reveal (yet again) how childishly they act when they don’t get their way. People generally dislike the behavior of spoiled children, and have a (somewhat unjustified by past practice) expectation that their elected representatives should act better than a spoiled 4-year-old.

Second, it will short-circuit that 30 hours of delay.

F’em, they started this whole thing with Harry Reid getting rid of the filibuster for all appointments except the SC, in an effort to quickly load up the DC Circuit with Obama’s picks. Since then, in 2014 the people took 5 seats from the Dems and gave them to the Republicans; in 2016 the kept the Senate Republican knowing that Trump was promising to fill the courts with Originalists; in 2018 they gave the Republicans another 2 seats - after Trump had followed through on his promises. So it seems pretty obvious that the American public is fine with what the Republicans are doing WRT the judiciary.


21 posted on 10/22/2020 11:45:34 AM PDT by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt, The Weapons Shops of Isher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
Ya, I thought the new precedent set with Kavanagh, was that we have to hit the pause button and wait for investigations of allegations of sexual misbehavior before proceeding.

Well, they tried that.

The demonRATs photo shopped a pix of Amy wearing a large double dildo, banging her black adopted daughter, and after 5 negative focus groups, they dropped that idea.

22 posted on 10/22/2020 11:48:15 AM PDT by USS Alaska (NUKE ALL MOOSELIMB TERRORISTS, NOW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: USS Alaska

How will Joe Manchin vote? Did he approve Kavanaugh?


23 posted on 10/22/2020 12:06:07 PM PDT by Zenjitsuman (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: catnipman
Then on Sunday, the cloture petition would be ready for a vote. That vote would curb any filibuster, or debate that would delay the vote on the nomination.

How many votes are needed to pass a cloture petition - a simple majority of the entire body, a simple majority of those present, or a 60-senator vote to approve??

24 posted on 10/22/2020 12:07:55 PM PDT by CedarDave (NM's oil patch needs fracking; large signs here saying: "Vote Trump 2020. Your job depends on it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zenjitsuman

Someone just told me yes Manchin was the only Dem to vote
for Kavanaugh. So I expect him to do so for Amy.

Funny that only women Republicans who have not had a GOP
woman on the court since O’connor are against Amy.
I don’t want to hear them ever say women need equal rights
again.


25 posted on 10/22/2020 12:10:53 PM PDT by Zenjitsuman (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: mass55th

You’re a tyrant


26 posted on 10/22/2020 12:10:59 PM PDT by campaignPete R-CT (Committee to Re-Elect the President ( CREEP ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: campaignPete R-CT
"You’re a tyrant"

I inherited it from my Patriot ancestors!! :-)

27 posted on 10/22/2020 12:21:10 PM PDT by mass55th ("Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway." ~~ John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: catnipman

Bookmark


28 posted on 10/22/2020 12:23:30 PM PDT by Cats1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

Cloture on a presidential nomination requires a simple majority of those present and voting. This was changed for all presidential appointments other than Supreme Court nominees in a 21 November 2013 Senate vote (the so-called “nuclear option”),[39] and was further extended to include Supreme Court nominees in an 6 April 2017 Senate vote.”

Wikipedia


29 posted on 10/22/2020 12:23:56 PM PDT by campaignPete R-CT (Committee to Re-Elect the President ( CREEP ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: catnipman
that occurred only because that senile old fool, Chuck Grassley, who was the Judicary Committee chair then, allowed it

We also had Traitor Jeff Flake. With only a 1 seat majority on the committee, Flake was able to prevent voting and force the delay. I'm not sure Mitch would have had the votes had Grassley voted Kavanaugh out of committee without a recommendation. Now we have Graham, a 2 seat majority and no Flake. Also, it's harder to have a circus with an empty gallery. Still your point that Graham is far better than the weak fool Grassley is certainly true, and he allowed the fiasco to happen.

30 posted on 10/22/2020 1:18:33 PM PDT by ETCM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: catnipman

I’ve started wondering about the swearing in process. Doesn’t she have to be sworn in by Roberts before she can take a seat????? And if so one has to wonder about Roberts!!


31 posted on 10/22/2020 1:32:28 PM PDT by Allen In Texas Hill Country
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

“How many votes are needed to pass a cloture petition - a simple majority of the entire body, a simple majority of those present, or a 60-senator vote to approve??”

simple majority ... and you can thank Mitch McConnell for that rules change that he and the GOP Senate effected right prior to the Kavanaugh nomination ... during the obama years, Harry Reid had nuked the filibuster for all Fed Judges EXCEPT SCOTUS when the Dems had majority in the Senate, and so Mitch finished the job by nuking the filibuster for SCOTUS ...


32 posted on 10/22/2020 2:31:22 PM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Midwesterner53

“Every conservative nomination to the Supreme Court now has a model on how to handle it down to the dotted I’s and crossed Ts.”

excellent point!


33 posted on 10/22/2020 2:31:50 PM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Allen In Texas Hill Country

“I’ve started wondering about the swearing in process. Doesn’t she have to be sworn in by Roberts before she can take a seat????? And if so one has to wonder about Roberts!!”

with the exception of presiding over impeachment trials, there’s no mention of chief justice in the US constitution, thus the authority of the chief justice is established entirely by statute or custom.

furthermore, there are very few other clauses about SCOTUS itself in the US constitution and those pertain only to the overall structure of the judiciary

swearing-in is largely ceremonial, and the chief justice is bound by the rules of the court itself anyway, so if anything, failure to swear-in could be considered an impeachable offense, though a pointless one at that ...


34 posted on 10/22/2020 2:42:21 PM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Pilgrim's Progress
E1-B981-A9-351-F-4-C52-A25-C-6-FD322-FA8-E39 10-BC3290-10-C2-44-AB-93-E4-1-C2-D70-DB0997
35 posted on 10/22/2020 4:43:41 PM PDT by coaster123 (Hate has a home here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Allen In Texas Hill Country

Oh good question. Roberts could delay this.


36 posted on 10/22/2020 4:55:21 PM PDT by Engedi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: pkajj

Was that ‘ripped label’ Mattress made in the US of A?
....Just asking for a Democrat friend.


37 posted on 10/22/2020 6:04:39 PM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rktman
Perhaps I should forward this to my “representatives” in the senate. Looking for the “precedent” clause concerning nominations in election years. Anyone? Bueller?

There was an article on here a week or two ago that did exactly what you're asking. If I remember correctly, every nomination with an friendly Senate was approved, while every nomination with a hostile Senate was rejected, except for two.
38 posted on 10/22/2020 7:30:32 PM PDT by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Svartalfiar

One of my two emailed me back saying she’d base her decision on “precedent”. She probably won’t like me response.


39 posted on 10/22/2020 7:56:27 PM PDT by rktman ( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...

40 posted on 10/22/2020 10:31:40 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson