Skip to comments.Welcome Back Football, But Leave Subsidies on the Bench
Posted on 10/21/2020 1:05:45 PM PDT by Kaslin
Editor's Note: This column was authored by Skip Estes.
It’s official: football Sundays are back. Last month the Las Vegas Raiders officially unveiled their new, state-of-the-art home at Allegiant Stadium. With a sleek, black 275-foot videoboard that looks like it belongs in the Death Star and a real grass field grown atop a track that allows it to be rolled outside for sun exposure, the facility cost $1.9 billion — a pretty penny. Yet, the Raiders organization is not breaking a sweat over the astronomical cost of their new stadium. Why? Perhaps $750 million in taxpayer dollars has something to do with it.
Prior to 2017, Las Vegas, “The Entertainment Capital of the World,” surprisingly lacked a single high-revenue professional sports team. During his tenure as Clark County commissioner, now-Governor Steve Sisolak made bringing professional sports into Las Vegas a goal of his administration. To that end, Clark County issued $750 million in municipal revenue bonds to secure the Oakland Raiders’ relocation to Las Vegas, becoming Nevada’s first NFL team. All the Raiders had to do was purchase a stadium construction site and pony up their share of the estimated construction costs. Altogether, this deal allowed the Raiders to pay only 61% of the total bill on the most expensive stadium ever built for a team.
With the COVID-19 economic shutdown, Clark County now faces a $315 million revenue shortfall for fiscal year 2021, but the amount owed to bond holders has not changed. And it’s local taxpayers that are on the hook. Nevada agreed to enact no further taxes on the team, players or football fans.
This is far from the first time something like this has happened. Arlington, Texas taxpayers forked over nearly $1 billion to pay for the new Texas Rangers’ Globe Life Park and Dallas Cowboys’ AT&T Stadium. Minneapolis taxpayers were on the hook for over $850 million to pay for the Minnesota Twins and Vikings’ new stadiums. Washington, D.C. taxpayers coughed up $300 million to pay for Audi Field, the most expensive soccer stadium in the United States. Localities taking on debt for dubious purposes is a widespread issue. The American Legislative Exchange Council’s (ALEC) State Bonded Obligations report finds states owe over $1 trillion in outstanding bonds. In total, it’s estimated state and local taxpayers have paid nearly $11 billion over the past 15 years to construct professional sport stadiums.
One could argue these deals make sense from a cost-benefit perspective, but the data disagrees. Researchers find stadium subsidies have nearly no return on investment. Economic activity from a sports stadium is often merely redirected from other local attractions, such as theaters or amusement parks. In Las Vegas’ case, every dollar spent at Allegiant Stadium is a dollar that could have been spent at a resort or casino. Consequently, the tax collection often cancels itself out. For example, the Atlanta Falcons’ Mercedes-Benz Stadium only generates $145 million annually in economic activity for a construction cost of $1.6 billion. Considering tax revenue is only a fraction of this amount, Atlanta sees even less for their $700 million investment.
Worse yet, when a team decides to find a new home, taxpayers are often left holding the bag. When the Oakland Raiders decided to relocate, Oakland and Alameda, Calif. still had $350 million in debt payments left from renovating Oakland Coliseum. They won’t finish paying off those renovations until 2025. The St. Louis Rams departing for Los Angeles is another example. St. Louis taxpayers were left with over $144 million in stadium debt and maintenance costs.
Fortunately, there’s a simple solution for governments when it comes to sports stadiums: Don’t subsidize them. ALEC, an organization of state legislators, adopted the “Resolution Opposing Taxpayers Financing of Professional Sports Stadiums” model policy. Virginia Delegate Michael Webert, Maryland Delegate David Moon, and DC council member David Grosso each introduced bills creating an interstate compact withholding potential subsidies for a new Washington NFL stadium. These actions represent a significant shift among state lawmakers toward opposing stadium subsidies.
SoFi Stadium, the most expensive stadium ever built and home to the Los Angeles Rams and Chargers, came at no cost to taxpayers. T-Mobile Arena was built to house Las Vegas’ first high-revenue professional sports team, the Vegas Golden Knights, and was funded entirely with private dollars. These examples demonstrate professional sports teams will invest in a stadium if there is a market for professional sports, regardless of development incentives. Moving forward, state and local governments should avoid the negative consequences of lopsided sports development deals and leave stadium subsidies on the bench.
Prior to 2017, Las Vegas, The Entertainment Capital of the World, surprisingly lacked a single high-revenue professional sports team.
I’m not sure it was surprising that Vegas didn’t get major league sports until recent years. I recall talk years ago, that sports leagues were concerned about legal sports betting in Nevada, as a reason to not have franchises there.
They don’t care about that anymore, but at one time, that was a strong deterrent to putting teams there.
These are no different than when big companies seek benefits for adding or moving facilities. It’s simply not good business to pay for something you don’t have to. Want these things to not happen, don’t vote for people that like to give stuff away. It’s right there in the article, the county commish then governor had a stated goal, a goal that included giving away money to lure them in.
I always thought that was odd. Anyone can place bets here, on any team, at any time. I think the main concern was perception, keeping players out of the casinos, so they can’t mug for the camera with the betting odds screen in the background. The only sure bet is my property taxes are going up.
No taxpayer money should have ever gone to buy palaces for billionaire owners.
It was basically left over from the days of scandal and mobsters. The sports all put a lot of effort into separating themselves from gambling. Even when they would acknowledge it they would skate around it. The pregame shows could say a team was “favored by 3” but they couldn’t say who was favoring them or what that meant. Just that they were favored. I’m still surprised the NFL was so quick to get into Vegas. Not that long ago Vegas couldn’t even put tourism ads in NFL games. Heck NBC wasn’t allowed to show commercials for their show Vegas during games. The league officially did not recognize Vegas as existing.
>>No taxpayer money should have ever gone to buy palaces for billionaire owners.<<
One of the few good things L.A. did before I left was refuse to pay for an NFL team. They always asked “what will you pay us?” Even the race pimp ridley-thomas was on board for that.
What happened with the new teams in that area I have no idea. I was happily here in Texas by then.
Right, most of which goes to Clark County School District, which is is huge money pit. So is the stadium, and we’re paying for it
Today’s football would be bad for America even without subsidies. The fans who contribute are funding socialists and racist haters of whites.
Wonder how much tax and regulatory savings, individual & corporate, was realized with this move out of California? While I realized my mind, my aged mind, still remembers Al Davis owning the Oakland Raiders, still here we see another California sports franchise exit to greener pastures and wonder if it is going to bounce like the Rams or a permanent move?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.