Chuck Grassley Defends Dianne Feinstein from Democrat Attacks: ‘Sexist & Ageist Motivations’

Breitbart ^ | 10/21/2020 | Hannah Bleau

[ChicagoConservative27]

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) rushed to the defense of his colleague Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) on Wednesday after leftists attacked the ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee over her handling of Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s confirmation hearing, accusing her critics of being driven by “sexist” and “ageist” motivations.

“Democrats calling for Senator Feinstein to step down from Judiciary Ranking Member should think twice abt their sexist & ageist motivations against an outstanding legislator & icon in her own right,” Grassley said, calling the attacks “totally unjustified”:

[ChicagoConservative27]

Well look at that, a RINO defending a rat. How exciting.

[old curmudgeon]

Senator Bilbo.............

Sor Senator FogBound.

[Hattie]

Please Grassley - it’s time for you to retire.

[Seruzawa]

Great, Chuck. Do you think that that baby-killer would do the same for you? Effing idiot.

[RckyRaCoCo]

One Big Happy Family

[EasySt]

Did he defend her decades of employing a Chinese spy?

[JustaCowgirl]

Don’t defend her, Chuck. She doesn’t deserve your defense.

[frogjerk]

While she grilled Barrett on questions on abortion and declared that a Justice Barrett would “vote to strip millions of Americans of their health care,” she admitted that the nominee impressed her with her explanation of severability and Obamacare, drawing ire from Democrats. Feinstein ultimately described the hearing as “one of the best set of hearings that I’ve participated in.” “It leaves one with a lot of hopes, a lot of questions and even some ideas perhaps of good bipartisan legislation we can put together,” she added.

Did you read the article you posted?

[Leaning Right]

> “sexist” and “ageist” motivations <

Sen. Grassley could not be more wrong. The radical left demands 100% obedience. They are attacking Feinstein only because she dared to be civil when she was supposed to be ruthless.

And this should be a lesson for all moderate liberals. If the radicals take over, the moderate liberals will be sent the guillotine right along with the conservatives.

[The Antiyuppie]

The attacks on her age are wrong. She seems to have most of whatever sense she ever had. But she should have lived to her present ripe old age as a private citizen. Seriously, how could she get re-elected after this?

https://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2018/08/01/details-chinese-spy-dianne-feinstein-san-francisco/

[rightwingcrazy]

“And this should be a lesson for all moderate liberals. If the radicals take over, the moderate liberals will be sent the guillotine right along with the conservatives.”

If the radicals fail to take over, the moderates will be blamed, and their fate will be the same.

[catnipman]

SO glad that Lindsey Graham is the Judiciary Committee chair, and not Chuck Grassley ... Grassley is the one that allowed the Democrats to turn the Kavanaugh hearings into a grotesque circus ... Graham’s Barrett hearing was slam, bam, thank you mam ...

(naturally, all the anti-Graham [actually anti-GOP trolls] never attack Grassley and never give Graham any credit)

[dandiegirl]

Does Chuck not remember her part in the almost total destruction of character of Brett Kavanaugh? What is wrong with these people.

[tflabo]

Out with the old, in with the bold— conservatives, that is.
Both Grassley and Feinstein need to take a sunset hike off the stage for good.

[shoedog]

Schumer wants Warner in their so he can be manipulated on going after Trump. They also didn’t think Feinstein went far enough to stop Barrett. This actully just makes it worse for Democrats as Grassley threw out the “sexist” card on replacing a woman, that’s taboo for Democrats. They will have to defend replacing a woman.

[butlerweave]

Stick it to them and vote for Amy

[Carl Vehse]

The only defense a person has for voting as a Demonicrat is that the person had been dead at the time.

[Mark]

We want the nominee confirmed and this Democrat is helping that to happen.

[AnotherUnixGeek]

accusing her critics of being driven by “sexist” and “ageist” motivations.

BS. Her critics are angry because she's only a liberal and they want left-wing radicals. Leave it to Grassley and other GOP establishment types to completely miss the point.

[shanover]

I hope the GOP has someone to eventually replace him.